3. Defining Outsiders

3.
Defining Outsiders

Thomas of Monmouth, The Life and Martyrdom of St. William of Norwich (c. 1173)

The church’s efforts to reorder the world in the image of heaven helped to deepen popular piety but they also fostered intolerance. Jews in particular increasingly became objects of aggression in the thirteenth century, not only because of their religion but also because of their professional activities as moneylenders. The propagation of the belief that Jews secretly sacrificed Christian children—a belief that appeared in a fully developed form for the first time in The Life and Martyrdom of St. William of Norwich, excerpted here—attests to the rise of anti-Jewish sentiment. This account was written by Thomas of Monmouth, a monk living in the English city of Norwich at the time when the events he describes allegedly took place. The evidence suggests that the body of a boy named William, who had met a violent death, was found in 1144. Thomas of Monmouth’s story tells us more about the development of systematic anti-Jewish mentality than it does about historical facts, however. Although Jews had no rituals involving blood sacrifice, similar charges were made against them across Europe, often leading to their persecution.

From Thomas of Monmouth, The Life and Miracles of St. William of Norwich, trans. Augustus Jessopp and Montague Rhodes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1896), 14–17, 19–23. (Although The Life and Martyrdom of St. William of Norwich is the correct translation of the original Latin title, in English it is more generally known as The Life and Miracles.)

How He Was Wont to Resort to the Jews, and Having Been Chid by His Own People for So Doing, How He Withdrew Himself from Them

When therefore he was flourishing in this blessed boyhood of his and had attained to his eighth year [c. 1140], he was entrusted to the skinners1 to be taught their craft. Gifted with a teachable disposition and bringing industry to bear upon it, in a short time he far surpassed lads of his own age in the craft aforesaid, and he equaled some who had been his teachers. So leaving the country, by the drawing of a divine attraction he betook himself to the city and lodged with a very famous master of that craft, and some time passed away. He was seldom in the country, but was occupied in the city and sedulously gave himself to the practice of his craft, and thus reached his twelfth year.

Now, while he was staying in Norwich, the Jews who were settled there and required their cloaks or their robes or other garments (whether pledged to them, or their own property) to be repaired, preferred him before all other skinners. For they esteemed him to be especially fit for their work, either because they had learnt that he was guileless and skillful, or because attracted to him by their avarice they thought they could bargain with him for a lower price. Or, as I rather believe, because by the ordering of divine providence he had been predestined to martyrdom from the beginning of time, and gradually step by step was drawn on, and chosen to be made a mock of and to be put to death by the Jews, in scorn of the Lord’s passion, as one of little foresight, and so the more fit for them. For I have learnt from certain Jews, who were afterwards converted to the Christian faith, how that at that time they had planned to do this very thing with some Christian, and in order to carry out their malignant purpose, at the beginning of Lent they had made choice of the boy William, being twelve years of age and a boy of unusual innocence. So it came to pass that when the holy boy, ignorant of the treachery that had been planned, had frequent dealings with the Jews, he was taken to task by Godwin the priest, who had the boy’s aunt as his wife, and by a certain Wulward with whom he lodged, and he was prohibited from going in and out among them anymore. But the Jews, annoyed at the thwarting of their designs, tried with all their might to patch up a new scheme of wickedness, and all the more vehemently as the day for carrying out the crime they had determined upon drew near, and the victim which they had thought they had already secured had slipped out of their wicked hands. Accordingly, collecting all the cunning of their crafty plots, they found—I am not sure whether he was a Christian or a Jew—a man who was a most treacherous fellow and just the fitting person for carrying out their execrable crime, and with all haste—for their Passover was coming on in three days—they sent him to find out and bring back with him the victim which, as I said before, had slipped out of their hands.

How He Was Seduced by the Jews’ Messenger

At the dawn of day, on the Monday after Palm Sunday, that detestable messenger of the Jews set out to execute the business that was committed to him, and at last the boy William, after being searched for with very great care, was found. When he was found, he got round him with cunning wordy tricks, and so deceived him with his lying promises. . . .

How on His Going to the Jews He Was Taken, Mocked, and Slain

Then the boy, like an innocent lamb, was led to the slaughter. He was treated kindly by the Jews at first, and, ignorant of what was being prepared for him, he was kept till the morrow. But on the next day, which in that year was the Passover for them,2 after the singing of the hymns appointed for the day in the synagogue, the chiefs of the Jews . . . suddenly seized hold of the boy William as he was having his dinner and in no fear of any treachery, and ill-treated him in various horrible ways. For while some of them held him behind, others opened his mouth and introduced an instrument of torture which is called a teazle,3 and, fixing it by straps through both jaws to the back of his neck, they fastened it with a knot as tightly as it could be drawn. After that, taking a short piece of rope of about the thickness of one’s little finger and tying three knots in it at certain distances marked out, they bound round that innocent head with it from the forehead to the back, forcing the middle knot into his forehead and the two others into his temples, the two ends of the rope being most tightly stretched at the back of his head and fastened in a very tight knot. The ends of the rope were then passed round his neck and carried round his throat under his chin, and there they finished off this dreadful engine of torture in a fifth knot.

But not even yet could the cruelty of the torturers be satisfied without adding even more severe pains. Having shaved his head, they stabbed it with countless thorn-points, and made the blood come horribly from the wounds they made. And cruel were they and so eager to inflict pain that it was difficult to say whether they were more cruel or more ingenious in their tortures. For their skill in torturing kept up the strength of their cruelty and ministered arms thereto. And thus, while these enemies of the Christian name were rioting in the spirit of malignity around the boy, some of those present adjudged him to be fixed to a cross in mockery of the Lord’s passion, as though they would say, “Even as we condemned the Christ to a shameful death, so let us also condemn the Christian, so that, uniting the Lord and his servant in a like punishment, we may retort upon themselves the pain of that reproach which they impute to us.”

Conspiring, therefore, to accomplish the crime of this great and detestable malice, they next laid their blood-stained hands upon the innocent victim, and having lifted him from the ground and fastened him upon the cross, they vied with one another in their efforts to make an end of him. And we, after enquiring into the matter very diligently, did both find the house, and discovered some most certain marks in it of what had been done there. For report goes that there was there instead of a cross a post set up between two other posts, and a beam stretched across the midmost post and attached to the other on either side. And as we afterwards discovered, from the marks of the wounds and of the bands, the right hand and foot had been tightly bound and fastened with cords, but the left hand and foot were pierced with two nails: so in fact the deed was done by design that, in case at any time he should be found, when the fastenings of the nails were discovered it might not be supposed that he had been killed by Jews rather than by Christians. But while in doing these things they were adding pang to pang and wound to wound, and yet were not able to satisfy their heartless cruelty and their inborn hatred of the Christian name, lo! after all these many and great tortures, they inflicted a frightful wound in his left side, reaching even to his inmost heart, and as though to make an end of all they extinguished his mortal life so far as it was in their power. And since many streams of blood were running down from all parts of his body, then, to stop the blood and to wash and close the wounds, they poured boiling water over him.

Thus then the glorious boy and martyr of Christ, William, dying the death of time in reproach of the Lord’s death, but crowned with the blood of a glorious martyrdom, entered into the kingdom of glory on high to live for ever. Whose soul rejoiceth blissfully in heaven among the bright hosts of the saints, and whose body by the omnipotence of the divine mercy worketh miracles upon earth.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

  1. What might Thomas of Monmouth have hoped to achieve in composing this text?

    Question

    8PdGPq4ja41swvuxM/ZKHyAJA2Pm/4hUMEQ3bx4Y1vtc3akUwkYLqVlmh5dnL7sysncOH/5jFT5up4vV0FtZcYFvJl6JKed+nE/5iN59JKBN6ekeq1rctOQSp/yB9ggnwSaxRU/D3gfXXjbA/GmHUlUAylqoFLGd
    What might Thomas of Monmouth have hoped to achieve in composing this text?
  2. According to the text, the way the Jews murdered William was designed to mock the crucifixion of Christ. Why would this have been especially threatening to Christians at the time?

    Question

    lLBuCQfYDGA2fyAy9rDev3jgv58uDR0q8eQIinhH5dDu9jSJgyaBKfYHXJNVYjTtaDz9iI7LOnt2zt+TUTDxSfQPpoy8Q8I7bK6LidgZtYwJHxQxogShUNL7R34AAgs8OAnYVJEjaKPZNOfPpkOgpqkS8klwuovJH7+Ju4qahXjsZ7phqkm9kHk43ceOsTjSiPxk+g5JuEiWtalOjW9c4W332L+6WbZKxnRGcer9JLrc02+4uQSLvzRFpO0yAIIMB+lrKukdX/yA5P+48hSECks24cdd9CFeIaN680CYyKk=
    According to the text, the way the Jews murdered William was designed to mock the crucifixion of Christ. Why would this have been especially threatening to Christians at the time?
  3. By the end of the twelfth century, William’s cult was firmly established, and his tomb was the purported site of many miracles and visions. Why did people accept the story of his martyrdom and his status as a true saint?

    Question

    IRg0RjDYmkZEWMEzJpvugkgH0xsUo1ZRhYLgCWAuPoPQDTdnnuaQmCcAPiKvmfmJD8BKhi00gJhvLe0damHtOr/QMzVaCzxd30u79et2oSGhk4KwckgYslpIDpHaAmE8T8HfbnilEgaev7Xmu3YuYZqEQfLBOz+yBOsjqKXO2N1pj90lTg6bp6ZyWXJF3rPH3rD4YuAmmIZOlFAhwje0CxIOPsD93NOFjnGaHlqCXjVPNAo2mVgpN2Fe/rZYGrl/Dfu43PmjNR15QLyXctc8SSMEXg5VZ9KfFVzTHTTKAVb6lkjk+J0GYcJVJEghufy9zgHcJe7jYBnlwLFHYoKJD0DToSM4+kwq
    By the end of the twelfth century, William’s cult was firmly established, and his tomb was the purported site of many miracles and visions. Why did people accept the story of his martyrdom and his status as a true saint?