5. Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism

5.
Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism

Rudyard Kipling, The White Man’s Burdenand

Editorial from the San Francisco Call (1899)

Another factor contributing to people’s sense of unease in the late nineteenth century was an increasingly loud debate over the merits of imperialism. This debate was not confined to European shores; it also exploded onto the American scene when the United States gained control of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines in February 1899 after its victory in the Spanish-American War. Rudyard Kipling (1865–1936) published the poem “The White Man’s Burden” in London and U.S. newspapers in direct response to the United States’ fledging status as an imperial power. He urged Americans to share the “burden”—of implanting Western civilization among the “new-caught, sullen peoples” of East Asia—already shouldered by Europe. Born in British India and the son of a civil servant, Kipling was well versed in the ways of empire building and had already made a name for himself as the author of The Jungle Book, among other works. The poem elicited a swift response across the United States, including the anti-imperialist editorial, which appeared in the San Francisco Call, that follows the poem.

From Rudyard Kipling’s Verse: Inclusive Edition (1885–1918) (New York: Doubleday, 1927), 371–72; “The White Man’s Burden,” San Francisco Call (Feb. 7, 1899). Reprinted on www.boondocksnet.com/ai/, Jim Zwick, ed., Anti-Imperialism in the United States.

The White Man’s Burden

Take up the White Man’s burden—

Send forth the best ye breed—

Go bind your sons to exile

To serve your captives’ need;

To wait in heavy harness,

On fluttered folk and wild—

Your new-caught, sullen peoples,

Half-devil and half-child.

Take up the White Man’s Burden—

In patience to abide,

To veil the threat of terror

And check the show of pride;

By open speech and simple,

An hundred times made plain,

To seek another’s profit,

And work another’s gain.

Take up the White Man’s burden—

The savage wars of peace—

Fill full the mouth of Famine

And bid the sickness cease;

And when your goal is nearest

The end for others sought,

Watch Sloth and heathen Folly

Bring all your hope to nought.

Take up the White Man’s burden—

No tawdry rule of kings,

But toil of serf and sweeper—

The tale of common things.

The ports ye shall not enter,

The roads ye shall not tread,

Go make them with your living,

And mark them with your dead.

Take up the White Man’s burden—

And reap his old reward:

The blame of those ye better,

The hate of those ye guard—

The cry of hosts ye humor

(Ah, slowly!) toward the light:—

“Why brought ye us from bondage,

Our loved Egyptian night?”

Take up the White Man’s burden—

Ye dare not stoop to less—

Nor call too loud on Freedom

To cloak your weariness;

By all ye cry or whisper,

By all ye leave or do,

The silent, sullen peoples

Shall weigh your Gods and you.

Take up the White Man’s burden—

Have done with childish days—

The lightly proffered laurel,

The easy, ungrudged praise.

Comes now, to search your manhood

Through all the thankless years,

Cold, edged with dear-bought wisdom,

The judgment of your peers!

Editorial from the San Francisco Call

Rudyard Kipling has joined the ranks of those eminent British jingoes who are trying to induce the United States to help Great Britain in her imperial schemes by taking part in the Oriental imbroglio. Chamberlain and Balfour have enticed us with lofty oratory. Kipling wooes us with a song published in The Call of Sunday.

The title of the ballad is “The White Man’s Burden.” Mr. Kipling sings:

Take up the White Man’s burden—

Have done with childish days—

The lightly proffered laurel,

The easy, ungrudged praise;

Comes now, to search your manhood

Through all the thankless years,

Cold, edged with dear-bought wisdom,

The judgment of your peers!

By way of further information as to what we shall have to do when we have done with childish days and set about winning the approving judgment of our peers with their cold, edged, dear-bought wisdom, the poet, drawing an easy lesson from the experience of Great Britain, adds:

Take up the White Man’s Burden—

Send forth the best ye breed—

Go, bind your sons to exile

To serve your captives’ need;

To wait, in heavy harness,

On fluttered folk and wild—

Your new-caught sullen peoples,

Half-devil and half-child.

It seems we are to infer from this that if we do not consent to send forth the best we breed to serve in exile amid the jungles of tropic islands for the noble purpose of imposing American law and civilization upon the mongrel races, half devil and half child, we shall lose the esteem of European powers now engaged in that task, and possibly the esteem of Mr. Kipling also. It is a dilemma from which we cannot escape. Fate has ordained it and face it we must.

We might be more willing to enter upon the imperial task if our British cousins were not so outspoken in their eagerness to get us to do so. Their willingness to have us share the glory of civilizing the Orient awakens a suspicion that the glory is not altogether a profitable one. Great Britain evidently has more than she can carry and would like to divide the glory with us.

The invitation to take part is flattering to our pride, but not attractive to our common sense. We have a pretty heavy white man’s burden at home and it will take something more than a song even from so strong a singer as Kipling to coax us to go to the Orient in search of an increase.

In all seriousness the eagerness of Chamberlain, Balfour, and other British leaders to get the United States involved in the affairs of the Orient and indirectly made a party to all European squabbles, is a significant sign of the times, and ought to be a sufficient warning to all intelligent Americans to avoid imperialism as they would a plague.

The pursuit of imperialism has raised up antagonists to Great Britain in every part of the world; it has imposed upon her people a heavy burden of debt and taxation; it has disturbed her politics by the continual menace of war and thus prevented the accomplishment of many needed reforms at home; and finally it has brought her into a position where without an ally she is confronted by a hostile world and is in danger of having her commerce, and perhaps even her empire, swept away at the first outbreak of war.

Rightly considered the white man’s burden is to set and keep his own house in order. It is not required of him to upset the brown man’s house under pretense of reform and then whip him into subjugation whenever he revolts at the treatment.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

  1. How does Kipling define the “White Man’s burden”? What duties does he think this “burden” entails?

    Question

    5Q7h9aSVudAbFhBMkrJkbObp3iAUm7Ky+mDPs1PvuhiHwTUH6Typ/ZYgIyoUjS7wmrlM7gFistxVj0weImyYWh6kcTbYxCmDnYn41z02n0LdMUfe7xX8pI6dU4yuycq8cp8Ho2D7Mr74W1VvrQi5c2+Iydsi+WR/xvoJ6tGweV7HVPr/BlVQNBCqzCoBseS3dqhWldyZ1ro=
    How does Kipling define the “White Man’s burden”? What duties does he think this “burden” entails?
  2. What kind of portrait does Kipling paint of non-Western peoples?

    Question

    o+mN9VYccfhEcOHETZGJGTmM1SDSn3sz9iOIyGkv88zAG2qlz//GxXXOx4nnPTZQS8Z4asCdWyAoQa6u0z3/x0f0Kq5z/EbWMhKoz/SMzfYXLTdFZisZUtfiiulbo08b0w9EKOTjNgL0+7/x
    What kind of portrait does Kipling paint of non-Western peoples?
  3. According to the author of the editorial from the San Francisco Call, why should Americans reject Kipling’s appeal and avoid imperialism “as they would a plague”?

    Question

    QG1eEPzMItMHZh8b8wCvm0RzlJ19dotXOvh9p7HLJmGgnrBk4K/+ilU1duAkb4M5JRVp4PLK1jT3zoM9sONuyxgLfUNx6SUCTgbrzt4JdM4FVJuXH4CG7tgiwCoTHpZPtEPgZ6KFu9gdM172DsWZsNOjMPhqIdxDWmjpbOFQCD6RiOb4OswIjB8bs7X9rzthguOk+P8l1URHpsoGdHLhUXB6ktqP3ZlyfWeZFH9rXIZrAgM9ppUdETkOFIYmrdxLPVNNLAHiS49YOFU4uSokqm5z8p7XuD1vJFwCNA==
    According to the author of the editorial from the San Francisco Call, why should Americans reject Kipling’s appeal and avoid imperialism “as they would a plague”?
  4. In what ways do these two sources expose the paradoxes of the new imperialism?

    Question

    bPUkcgxJ9FL9LgSEuSX9NuQa9PvBaYgF7GJMO3AXP5KnY1eGRm/v2H6TCh46Wi4jCjwVSF1CXmIP7ixS07h82RcFvn/TtKbGp3pw/YbUVjohNUaYk4Mvhu4On2w9xad8kKqirILaGuLlesn3b0OcmZwYgBz42yY9
    In what ways do these two sources expose the paradoxes of the new imperialism?