Suggested Responses to Additional Exercises and Cases for Chapter 15: Making Oral Presentations

Suggested Response to “Poking Fun at Presentation-Graphics Software”

Norvig’s parody of presentation-graphics software illustrates that not every occasion requires a presentation supported by technology and that some ideas cannot easily be presented in a simple bulleted list.

Suggested Response to “Evaluating Presentation-Graphics Templates”

Although responses will vary, a strong response will address the template’s adherence to the core design principles of proximity, alignment, repetition, and contrast; its simplicity and whether any of its features introduce unnecessarily clutter; the degree of flexibility it offers in allowing users to customize the presentation of text to their needs; and the relevance of any visual aids included.

Suggested Response to “Delivering an Impromptu Presentation”

Responses will vary. If this is students’ first opportunity to present in class, I try to keep the feedback short and simple. I recommend that each listener write down one part of the presentation that he or she thought was particularly effective and one element that was confusing or distracting.

Suggested Response to “Evaluating a Recent Presentation”

Although responses will vary, successful responses will address many, if not all, of the issues covered in the Speaker’s Checklist at the end of Chapter 15. This project provides students with an opportunity to listen critically to a live presentation and to reflect on the effectiveness of the techniques used.

Suggested Response to “Creating Presentation Graphics”

Responses will vary. This project provides students with practice designing presentation graphics to accompany a speech. Students also learn the limitations of bulleted lists as a format for presentation graphics. Finally, this project requires students to evaluate the content of the speech and not its delivery.

Suggested Response to “A Presentation on Presentation Graphics”

The following slide explains some principles of effective presentation graphics:

Principles of Effective Presentation Graphics

  1. Simplify.

  2. Use color.

  3. Translate numbers into graphics.

  4. Include only one key point per graphic.

  5. Use graphics that relate to your topic.

The following slide describes questions to ask when designing presentation graphics:

Planning Presentation Graphics

Your answers to the following questions will help you design effective presentation graphics:

  1. How complex is my message?

  2. How big is my audience?

  3. How formal is the atmosphere?

  4. How much interest will my audience have in my message?

  5. Where will I deliver my message?

  6. Will I deliver this message again?

Although these two examples are text only, students will likely include graphics as well as text in their slides, to illustrate both good and bad examples of presentation graphics.

Suggested Response to “Presenting Resources for Students in Your Major”

This case calls for students to synthesize all the information in Chapter 15. They have been given an audience and a purpose, but they need to generate the information, select an appropriate organizational pattern, create the slides, rehearse the presentation, and deliver it.

Suggested Response to “Choosing Effective Slide Layouts”

1. Sample email message with guidelines:

From: your_name@mail.com

To: sang_lee@adacounty.gov

Subject: Slide Layout Guidelines

Sang,

Last night I spent some time on the Internet researching guidelines for preparing effective presentation graphics. I focused on guidelines related to slide layout. Below I have distilled my findings into a list of 10 guidelines:

Later this afternoon I plan to take a look at the sample slides you emailed me. I’ll get back to you this evening. If you have questions about the above guidelines, let me know.

[your name]

2. Sample email message and revised slides:

From: your_name@mail.com

To: sang_lee@adacounty.gov

Subject: Fingerprint Slide Revisions

Hello Sang,

I’ve revised the slides for your fingerprinting presentation. In some cases, I recommend creating additional slides. Below I discuss the revisions I made to each slide.

Slide 1 (Some Fingerprint Background). This slide was cluttered with too much text. I reduced the amount of text and focused the slide on important milestones in fingerprinting. I omitted details such as specific names because I thought the event was more important than the specific person. During your presentation, you can connect a specific name with each event.

Slide 2 (Cyanoacrylate-Fuming Method). Based on your notes, I think that you are attempting to cover too much content with just a single slide. Before you discuss this specific method, I think you need to create two new slides: “Types of Fingerprints” and “Techniques for Making Latent Prints Visible.” For slide 2, I focused the content on what I thought were the most important points and suggested you add a photo of this method.

Slide 3 (Different Patterns of Fingerprints). I deleted the distracting watermark of a fingerprint. I revised this slide to include an overview slide of the basic patterns and then added three slides describing the patterns. I used a different slide for each pattern to allow space for including a graphic illustrating each feature. On the overview slide, you might want to include a picture of an actual fingerprint that clearly shows the minute ridges and valleys that form the patterns you list.

Slide 4 (Identifications). As in the case of slide 2, I think you need to use more than one slide to discuss your content. Before you discuss examples of different numbers of points required for making an identification, you should include a slide on the requirements of matching fingerprints. The bullets on slide 4 were a bit overwhelming. I presented the information in a table.

Slide 5 (The Future of Fingerprinting). Again, I think you should include a slide before this one covering “Fingerprints and Biometric Technology.” Then you could use slide 5 to illustrate the important role of fingerprinting in biometric identification. I changed your list to a pie chart to better show the relative importance of fingerprinting compared to other biometric identification methods.

For each slide, I added a light yellow background to soften the contrast between the solid white background and the black text. I also used the footer in the master slide to add the name of your organization, the year, the title of your presentation, and the slide number to each slide.

If you have questions about my revisions or would like to further discuss your presentation, let me know.

[your name]

image
image
image