Playing the Name Game
Background
Crescent Energy, an oil-
Crescent Energy was established 40 years ago by family members related by marriage to the Saudi royal family. At the company headquarters, the support staff and clerical staff include women, most of whom are related to the owners of the company. The professional, managerial, and executive staff are all male, which is traditional in Saudi corporations. Crescent is a large company, with revenues in the billions of dollars.
McNeil Informatics is a small firm (12 employees) established two years ago by Denise McNeil, a 29-
Denise traveled to New York from her headquarters in Pittsburgh to attend a briefing by Crescent. All the representatives from Crescent were middle-
Once back in her hotel room, Denise was still bothered by the Crescent representatives’ behavior at the meeting. She thought about the possibility of gender discrimination but decided to bid for the project anyway, because she believed that her company could write a persuasive proposal. McNeil Informatics had done several projects of this type in the past year.
She phoned Josh Lipton, the technical writer, to get him started on the proposal. “When you put in the boilerplate about the company, I’d like you to delete the stuff about my founding the company. Don’t say that a woman is the president, okay? And when you assemble the résumés of the project team, I’d like you to use just the first initials, not the first names.”
“I don’t understand, Denise. What’s going on?” Josh asked.
“Well, Crescent looks like an all-
“You know, Denise, there’s another problem.”
“Which is?”
“I’m thinking of the lead engineer we used in the other networking projects this year.”
“Mark Steinberg,” she said, sighing. “Do you think this will be a problem?”
“I don’t know,” Josh said. “I guess we could use another person. Or kind of change his name on the résumé.”
“Before we commit more resources to this project, we need to find out if Crescent would act prejudicially. We need more information. Do you have any ideas?”
“Let me think about this a little bit. I’ll email you tomorrow morning.”
After hanging up with Josh, Denise decided to phone her mentor, Jane Adams. Denise explained what had happened at the meeting with the Crescent representatives and asked, “If I conceal the gender and ethnicity of my employees and never mention I am the company’s founder, am I condoning the same types of prejudice that led me to start my own company in the first place, or am I just being a practical businesswoman?”
Jane avoided responding immediately to Denise’s question and instead asked for more information: “Besides what happened today, do you have any other evidence that suggests Crescent won’t do business with you if you disclose such information in your proposal?”
“I don’t know yet. I’ve asked one of my employees to come up with a research plan. But what if we find out they do business only within the Saudi version of the good-
“What if you find no signs of anti-
After a long pause, Denise said, “Either way, I’m not sure what to do.”
Your Assignment
How should Denise research the situation? In an email to Denise, outline a research strategy to find out more about Crescent’s business relationships with non-
Is Denise’s decision to disguise the sex of her employees and to cover up her own role in founding her company justified by common sense, or is it giving in to what she perceives as prejudice? What should Denise do about the fact that the person she wishes to designate as the lead engineer has an ethnic last name that might elicit a prejudiced reaction from Crescent officials? Should she assign someone other than Mark Steinberg to run the project? Should she tailor his name to disguise his ethnicity? If you were Denise’s mentor, what advice would you give her? Respond in a 500-
[A version of this case first appeared in Ethics in Technical Communication: A Critique and Synthesis (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 2001), by Mike Markel.]