737
DARRIN M. MCMAHON
Darrin M. McMahon was educated at the University of California–Berkeley, where he received his Ph.D. in 1997. The author of Happiness: A History (2006), he has taught at Columbia University, Yale University, and New York University. We reprint an essay first published in the New York Times on December 29, 2005.
In Pursuit of Unhappiness
“Happy New Year!” We seldom think of those words as an order. But in some respects that is what they are.
Doesn’t every American want to be happy? And don’t most Americans yearn, deep down, to be happy all of the time? The right laid out in our nation’s Declaration of Independence — to pursue happiness to our hearts’ content — is nowhere on better display than in the rites of the holiday season. With glad tidings and good cheer, we seek to bring one year to its natural happy conclusion, while preparing to usher in a happy new year and many happy returns.
738
Like the cycle of the seasons, our emphasis on mirth may seem timeless, as though human beings have always made merry from beginning to end. But in fact this preoccupation with perpetual happiness is relatively recent. As Thomas Carlyle observed in 1843, “‘Happiness our being’s end and aim’ is at bottom, if we will count well, not yet two centuries old in the world.”
Carlyle’s arithmetic was essentially sound, for changes in both religious and secular culture since the seventeenth century made “happiness,” in the form of pleasure or good feeling, not only morally acceptable but commendable in and of itself. While many discounted religious notions that consigned life in this world to misery and sin, others discovered signs of God’s providence in earthly satisfaction. The result was at once to weaken and transpose the ideal of heavenly felicity, in effect bringing it to earth. Suffering was not our natural state. Happy was the way we were meant to be.
5 That shift was monumental, and its implications far reaching. Among other things, it was behind the transformation of the holiday season from a time of pious remembrance into one of unadulterated bliss. Yet the effects were greater than that. As Carlyle complained, “Every pitifulest whipster that walks within a skin has had his head filled with the notion that he is, shall be, or by all human and divine laws ought to be, ‘happy.’”
Carlyle was notoriously cranky, but his central insight — that the new doctrine of happiness tended to raise expectations that could never possibly be fulfilled — remains as relevant today as it was in 1843. Despite enjoying far better living standards and more avenues for pleasure than before, human beings are arguably no happier now than they’ve ever been.
Sociologists like to point out that the percentage of those describing themselves as “happy” or “very happy” has remained virtually unchanged in Europe and the United States since such surveys were first conducted in the 1950s. And yet, this January, like last year and next, the self-help industry will pour forth books promising to make us happier than we are today. The very demand for such books is a strong indication that they aren’t working.
Should that be a cause for concern? Some critics say it is. For example, economists like Lord Richard Layard and Daniel Kahneman have argued that the apparent stagnancy of happiness in modern societies should prompt policymakers to shift their priorities from the creation of wealth to the creation of good feelings, from boosting gross national product to increasing gross national happiness.
But before we take such steps, we might do well to reflect on the darker side of holiday cheer: those mysterious blues that are apt to set in while the streamers stream and the corks pop; the little voice that even in the best of souls is sometimes moved to say, “Bah, humbug.” As Carlyle put it, “The prophets preach to us, ‘Thou shalt be happy; thou shalt love pleasant things.’” But as he well knew, the very commandment tended to undermine its fulfillment, even to make us sad.
10 Carlyle’s sometime friend and long-time rival, the philosopher John Stuart Mill, came to a similar conclusion. His words are all the more worth heeding in that Mill himself was a determined proponent of the greatest happiness for the greatest number. “Ask yourself whether you are happy, and you cease to be so,” Mill concluded after recovering from a serious bout of depression. Rather than resign himself to gloom, however, Mill vowed instead to look for happiness in another way.
“Those only are happy,” he came to believe, “who have their minds fixed on some object other than their own happiness; on the happiness of others; on the improvement of mankind, even on some art or pursuit, followed not as a means, but as itself an ideal end. Aiming thus at something else, they find happiness by the way.” For our own culture, steeped as it is in the relentless pursuit of personal pleasure and endless cheer, that message is worth heeding.
739
So in these last days of 2005 I say to you, “Don’t have a happy new year!” Have dinner with your family or walk in the park with friends. If you’re so inclined, put in some good hours at the office or at your favorite charity, temple, or church. Work on your jump shot or your child’s model trains. With luck, you’ll find happiness by the by. If not, your time won’t be wasted. You may even bring a little joy to the world.
Who or what gives us the “order” to be happy — or is the whole idea silly? (See paras. 1 and 9.) Explain your response.
What’s the difference between happiness and pleasure, or are these two different ways of saying the same thing? Explain your response.
Has Darrin McMahon persuaded you to think of happiness in a fresh way? Why, or why not?
McMahon’s article was originally published on December 29, so it’s not surprising that in paragraph 2 he says his readers are preparing “to usher in a happy new year.” Try to recall how you spent the most recent New Year’s Eve. Was it a happy evening? Or was it tinged with melancholy, perhaps even with sorrow as you remembered sad things and hoped that the next year would be happier? If you can’t remember New Year’s Eve, think of the last year as a whole: Was it predominantly happy or unhappy? Or can’t you judge it in such terms? Explain your response.
McMahon says (para. 4) that since the seventeenth century a shift in thinking has occurred: “Suffering [is] not our natural state. Happy was the way we were meant to be.” Assume you are speaking to someone who has not read McMahon’s essay. How would you explain this point?
John Stuart Mill (para. 10) is often described as a hedonist. What do you have to do or believe to be a hedonist? Are you a hedonist? Explain why or why not in 250 words.
Are you likely to take the advice McMahon offers in his final paragraph? Why, or why not?
Suppose you believed that we (say, American citizens) are happier today than we were three centuries ago. How would you go about arguing for your belief?