Boston’s Town Meeting met on the day after the massacre and appointed James Bowdoin, Samuel Pemberton, and Joseph Warren to write a report on the events of March 5. On March 19 the trio presented their official report, which included depositions from ninety-six witnesses. The town printed the report and sent copies to influential people in Britain. The resulting pamphlet, A Short Narrative of the Horrid Massacre, begins with the appointment of customs commissioners in 1767 and the arrival of British troops in 1768 to enforce the revenue laws. The following excerpt illustrates how the town of Boston sought to explain how the tense situation of 1768 and 1769 exploded into violence on the night of March 5, 1770.
It may be a proper introduction to this narrative, briefly to represent the state of things for some time previous to the said massacre: And this seems necessary in order to the forming a just idea of the causes of it.
At the end of the late war, in which this Province bore so distinguished a part, a happy union subsisted between Great-Britain and the Colonies. This was unfortunately interrupted by the Stamp-Act: but it was in some measure restored by the Repeal of it. It was again interrupted by other acts of parliament for taxing America; and by the appointment of a Board of Commissioners, in pursuance of an act, which by the face of it was made for the relief and encouragement of commerce, but which in its operation, it was apprehended, would have, and it has in fact had, a contrary effect. By the said act the said Commissioners were “to be resident in some convenient part of his Majesty’s dominions in America.” This must be understood to be in some part convenient for the whole. But it does not appear, that in fixing the place of their residence, the convenience of the whole was at all consulted, for Boston being very far from the centre of the colonies, could not be the place most convenient for the whole. Judging by the act, it may seem this town was intended to be favoured, by the Commissioners being appointed to reside here; and that the consequence of that residence would be the relief and encouragement of commerce: but the reverse has been the constant and uniform effect of it. So that the commerce of the town, from the embarrassments in which it has been lately involved, is greatly reduced. For the particulars on this head, see the state of the trade not long since drawn up and transmitted to England by a committee of the merchants of Boston.
… What gave occasion to the melancholy event of that evening seems to have been this. A difference having happened near Mr. Gray’s ropewalk, between a soldier and a man belonging to it, the soldier challenged the ropemakers to a boxing match. The challenge was accepted by one of them, and the soldier worsted. He ran to the barrack in the neighborhood, and returned with several of his companions. The fray was renewed, and the soldiers driven off. They soon returned with recruits, and were again worsted. This happened several times, till at length a considerable body of soldiers were collected, and they also were driven off, the ropemakers having been joined by their brethren of the contiguous ropewalks. By this time Mr. Gray being alarmed interposed, and with the assistance of some gentlemen prevented any further disturbance. To satisfy the soldiers and punish the man who had been the occasion of the first difference, and as an example to the rest, he turned him out of his service; and waited on Col. Dalrymple, the commanding officer of the troops, and with him concerted measures for preventing further mischief. Though this affair ended thus, it made a strong impression on the minds of the soldiers in general, who thought the honor of the regiment concerned to revenge those repeated repulses. For this purpose they seem to have formed a combination to commit some outrage upon the inhabitants of the town indiscriminately; and this was to be done on the evening of the 5th instant or soon after; as appears by the depositions of the following persons.
Source: A Short Narrative of the Horrid Massacre in Boston (Boston: Edes and Gill, 1770), 5–6, 16–17.
Evaluating the Evidence