Recognizing Logical Fallacies

See more on faulty thinking.

Logical fallacies are common mistakes in thinking that may lead to wrong conclusions or distort evidence. Here are a few familiar logical fallacies.

Term Explanation Example
Non Sequitur Stating a claim that doesn’t follow from your first premise or statement; Latin for “It does not follow” Jenn should marry Mateo. In college he got all A’s.
Oversimplification Offering easy solutions for complicated problems If we want to end substance abuse, let’s send every drug user to prison for life. (Even aspirin users?)
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Assuming a cause-and-effect relationship where none exists, even though one event preceded another; Latin for “after this, therefore because of this” After Jenny’s black cat crossed my path, everything went wrong, and I failed my midterm.
Allness Stating or implying that something is true of an entire class of things, often using all, everyone, no one, always, or never Students enjoy studying. (All students? All subjects? All the time?)
Proof by Example or Too Few Examples Presenting an example as proof rather than as illustration or clarification; overgeneralizing (the basis of much prejudice) Armenians are great chefs. My neighbor is Armenian, and can he cook!
Begging the Question Proving a statement already taken for granted, often by repeating it in different words or by defining a word in terms of itself Rapists are dangerous because they are menaces.
Happiness is the state of being happy.
Circular Reasoning Supporting a statement with itself; a form of begging the question He is a liar because he simply isn’t telling the truth.
Either/Or Reasoning Oversimplifying by assuming that an issue has only two sides, a statement must be true or false, a question demands a yes or no answer, or a problem has only two possible solutions (and one that’s acceptable) What are we going to do about global warming? Either we stop using all of the energy-consuming vehicles and products that cause it, or we just learn to live with it.
Argument from Dubious Authority Using an unidentified authority to shore up a weak argument or an authority whose expertise lies outside the issue, such as a television personality selling insurance According to some of the most knowing scientists in America, smoking two packs a day is as harmless as eating oatmeal cookies.
Argument ad Hominem Attacking an individual’s opinion by attacking his or her character, thus deflecting attention from the merit of a proposal; Latin for “against the man” Diaz may argue that we need to save the polar bears, but he’s the type who gets emotional over nothing.
Argument from Ignorance Maintaining that a claim has to be accepted because it hasn’t been disproved or that it has to be rejected because it has not been proved Despite years of effort, no one has proved that ghosts don’t exist; therefore, we should expect to see them at any time.
No one has ever shown that life exists on any other planet; clearly the notion of other living things in the universe is absurd.
Argument by Analogy Treating an extended comparison between familiar and unfamiliar items, based on similarities and ignoring differences, as evidence rather than as a useful way of explaining People were born free as the birds; it’s cruel to expect them to work.
Bandwagon Argument Suggesting that everyone is joining the group and that readers who don’t may miss out on happiness, success, or a reward Purchasing the new Global Glimmer admits you to the nation’s most elite group of smartphone users.