Who Am I?
Authors
Thomas E. Ludwig, Hope College
Raechel Soicher, American River College
Synopsis
After examining some of the theoretical foundations of identity development, your exploration will continue when you observe several teenagers who are also on their journey of identity development.
REFERENCES
Adams, G. R., Gulotta, T. P., & Montemayor, R. (Eds.) (1992). Adolescent identity formation. Newbury Park, NY: Sage.
Allison, B. N., & Schultz, J. B. (2001). Interpersonal identity formation during early adolescence. Adolescence, 36, 509-523.
Balistreri, E., Busch-Rossnagel, N. A., & Geisinger, K. F. (1995). Development and preliminary validation of the Ego Identity Process Questionnaire. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 179-192.
Berzonsky, M.D. (2011). A social-cognitive perspective on identity construction. In Schwartz, S.J., Luyckx, K., & Vignoles, V.L. (Eds.) (2011) Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. New York: Springer Science.
Bilsker, D., & Marcia, J. E. (1991). Adaptive regression and ego identity. Journal of Adolescence, 14, 75-84.
Bilsker, D., Schiedel, D., & Marcia, J. (1988). Sex differences in identity status. Sex Roles, 18, 231-236.
Coatsworth, J.D., Sharp, E.H., Palen, L., Darling, N., Cumsille, P., & Marta, E. (2005). Exploring adolescent self-defining leisure activities and identity experiences across three countries. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 361-370.
Cramer, P. (2001). Identification and its relation to identity development. Journal of Personality, 69, 667-688.
Dunkel, C. S. (2000). Possible selves as a mechanism for identity exploration. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 519-529.
Dunkel, C. S., & Anthis, K. S. (2001). The role of possible selves in identity formation: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 765-776.
Erikson, E. H. (1956). The problem of ego identity. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 4, 56-121.
Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers. Psychological Issues, 1, 1-171.
Erikson, E. H. (1964). A memorandum on identity and Negro youth. Journal of Social Issues, 20, 29-42.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: Norton.
Erikson, E. H. (1970). Autobiographic notes on the identity crisis. Daedalus, 99, 730-759.
Erikson, E. H. (1988). Youth: Fidelity and diversity. Daedalus, 117, 1-24.
Klaassen, D. W., & McDonald, M. J. (2002). Quest and identity development: Re-examining pathways for existential search. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 12, 189-200.
Klimstra, T.A., Luyck, K., Hale, W.A., Frijns, T., van Lier, P.A.C., & Meeus, W.H.J. (2010). Short-term fluctuations in identity: Introducing a micro-level approach to identity formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 191-202.
Kroger, J. (2000). Ego identity status research in the new millennium. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 145-148.
Kroger, J. (2002). Identity processes and contents through the years of late adulthood. Identity, 2, 81-99.
Luyck, K., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., & Berzonsky, M.D. (2007). Parental psychological control and dimensions of identity formation in emerging adulthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 546-550.
Marcia, J. (1967). Ego identity status: Relationship to change in self-esteem, “general maladjustment,” and authoritarianism. Journal of Personality, 35, 119-133.
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551-558.
Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology. New York: Wiley.
Marcia, J. E., Waterman, A. S., Matteson, D. R., Archer, S. L., & Orlofsky, J. L. (Eds.) (1993). Ego identity: A handbook for psychosocial research. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Marcia, J. E. (2002). Identity and psychosocial development in adulthood. Identity, 2, 7-28.
Meeus, W., Iedema, J., Helsen, M., & Vollebergh, W. (1999). Patterns of adolescent identity development: Review of literature and longitudinal analysis. Developmental Review, 19, 419-461.
Orlofsky, J. L., Marcia, J. E., & Lesser, I. M. (1973). Ego identity status and the intimacy versus isolation crisis of young adulthood. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 27, 211-219.
Pempek, T.A., Yermolayeva, Y.A., & Calvert, S.L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 227-238.
Phoenix, T. L. (2001). Who am I?: Identity formation, youth, and therapeutic recreation. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 35, 348-356.
Serafini, T. E., & Adams, G. R. (2002). Functions of identity: Scale construction and validation. Identity, 2, 361-389.
Slugoski, B. R., Marcia, J. E., & Koopman, R. F. (1984). Cognitive and social interactional characteristics of ego identity statuses in college males. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 47, 646-661.
Toder, N. L., & Marcia, J. E. (1973). Ego identity status and response to conformity pressure in college women. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 26, 287-294.
Torres, V., Jones, S.R., & Renn, K.A. (2009). Identity Development Theories in Student Affairs: Origins, Current Status, and New Approaches. Journal of College Student Development, 50, 577-596.
Umaña-Taylor, A.J., Bhanot, R., & Shin, N. (2006). Ethnic Identity Formation During Adolescence, The Critical Role of Families. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 390-414.
Waterman, A. S. (1999). Identity, the identity statuses, and identity status development: A contemporary statement. Developmental Review, 19, 591-621.
Yoder, A. E. (2000). Barriers to ego identity status formation: A contextual qualification of Marcia’s identity status paradigm. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 95-106.
As teenagers become more independent, one of their most important tasks is to form a sense of their own identity, a sense of themselves as distinct both from their parents and from their peers.
Erik Erikson claimed that identity formation is the biggest challenge of adolescence. As part of his theory of psychosocial development, he argued that most teens are faced with a crisis called identity versus role confusion. During this stage, adolescents are likely to move in and out of various phases of exploration in effort to establish their independence and sense of self.
According to Erikson, the goal of this psychosocial stage is identity achievement. An adolescent or emerging adult who attains identity achievement has struggled with and/or explored questions of identity and purpose and has formed and/or committed to a direction for the future. This commitment may include a provisional career choice and/or a set of values and beliefs on key self-defining topics, such as religion, politics, family, friendships, dating, or gender roles. Researchers have found that individuals with the status of identity achievement tend to be mature, balanced thinkers.
Perhaps the most influential of Erikson’s followers on the topic of identity formation is James Marcia. Marcia developed techniques for measuring a person’s progress through the identity formation process. Marcia explicitly identified two dimensions that characterize identity formation.
Marcia continued to delve more deeply into Erikson’s identity development crisis of adolescence by dissecting it into four phases:
No two passages through the challenges of identity development are the same as each individual is unique as are his/her surrounding social influences. Identity formation is a long, slow process, and not everyone reaches the status of identity achievement. According to Marcia, there are four phases of identity development. Any adolescent may pass through, skip, or stop off at any one of these points during his/her identity journey.
Identity diffusion represents a period of apathy. Developmentalists do believe that during the first half of adolescence many teens go through a period of identity diffusion, in which they are relatively uninterested in questions of identity and are definitely not ready to commit to a set of values or beliefs. Teenagers in this status are drifting through life without a clear sense of direction. Some may remain in this status all through adolescence and into adulthood.
Foreclosure represents a commitment formed without adequate exploration. Adolescents may take the short-cut of foreclosure when they avoid struggling with their own identity and simply build an identity based on the values and beliefs of others, such as parents, role models, or even some powerful or persuasive group. Depending on the individual or group on which a teen’s identity is modeled, this process may not yield a positive outcome especially if, for example, the group or individual promotes violence, destructive behavior, or devalues individual, independent thinking.
Moratorium is signaled by a high score on exploration and a low score on commitment. Eventually, many teens or emerging adults do begin to struggle with questions of identity by trying out different roles and experimenting with different lifestyles while making no commitment to any of them. Two common sites for moratorium are college and military service. Both of these institutions provide opportunities to try out different roles on a temporary basis while putting off any binding decisions about the future.
Identity achievement is exemplified by those who have committed themselves to a particular identity while remaining willing to explore their identities further if the situation requires it. Those in identity achievement demonstrate both high degrees of personal exploration and commitment simultaneously.
Now, let’s see if you can apply what you have learned about the central role of exploration and commitment in establishing an identity. On the next few screens, you will observe several teens. As you view each video clip, listen for evidence about the person’s degree of exploration of and level of commitment to a life plan, set of values, career path, etc.
Watch this clip of Michael, who is 17 years old and a junior in high school.
Now, let’s see if you can apply what you have learned about the central role of exploration and commitment in establishing an identity. On the next few screens, you will observe several teens. As you view each video clip, listen for evidence about the person’s degree of exploration of and level of commitment to a life plan, set of values, career path, etc.
Watch this clip of Michael, who is 17 years old and a junior in high school.
Watch this clip of Doris, who is 17 years old and a senior in high school.
Watch this clip of Doris, who is 17 years old and a senior in high school.
Watch this very short clip of Olivier, who is 17 years old and is a senior in high school.
Watch this clip of Alvin, who is 17 years old and a junior in high school.
Congratulations! You have completed this activity.Total Score: x out of x points (x%) You have received a provisional score for your essay answers, which have been submitted to your instructor.