Read the Research

No matter how deeply you think about your own experiences, and no matter how intently you listen to others whose background is unlike yours, you also need to read scholarly published work in order to fully understand any topic that interests you. Be skeptical about magazine or newspaper reports; some are bound to be simplified, exaggerated, or biased.

Professional Journals and Books

Part of the process of science is that conclusions are not considered solid until they are corroborated in many studies, which means that you should consult several sources on any topic. Four journals in human development are:

  1. Developmental Psychology (published by the American Psychological Association)

  2. Child Development (Society for Research in Child Development)

  3. Developmental Review (Elsevier)

  4. Human Development (Karger)

These journals differ in the types of articles and studies they publish, but all are well respected and peer-reviewed, which means that other scholars review each article submitted and recommend that it be accepted, rejected, or revised. Every article includes references to other recent work.

A-2

Also look at journals that specialize in longer reviews from the perspective of a researcher.

  1. Child Development Perspectives (from Society for Research in Child Development)

  2. Perspectives on Psychological Science (This is published by the Association for Psychological Science. APS publishes several excellent journals, none specifically on development but every issue has at least one article that is directly relevant.)

Beyond these six are literally thousands of other professional journals, each with a particular perspective or topic, including many in sociology, family studies, economics, and so on. To judge them, look for journals that are peer-reviewed. Also consider the following details: the background of the author (research funded by corporations tends to favor their products); the nature of the publisher (professional organizations, as in the first two journals above, protect their reputations); how long the journal has been published (the volume number tells you that). Some interesting work does not meet these criteria, but these are guides to quality.

Many books cover some aspect of development. Single-author books are likely to present only one viewpoint. That view may be insightful, but it is limited. You might consult a handbook, which is a book that includes many authors and many topics. One good handbook in development, now in its seventh edition (a sign that past scholars have found it useful) is:

  1. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science. Edited by Richard M. Lerner (7th ed.), 2015, Wiley.

Again, dozens of good handbooks are available, many of which focus on a particular age, perspective, or topic.

The Internet

The Internet is a mixed blessing, useful to every novice and experienced researcher but dangerous as well. Every library worldwide and most homes in North America, Western Europe, and East Asia have computers that provide access to journals and other information. If you’re doing research in a library, ask for help from the librarians; many of them can guide you in the most effective ways to conduct online searches. In addition, other students, friends, and even strangers can be helpful.

Virtually everything is on the Internet, not only massive national and international statistics but also accounts of very personal experiences. Photos, charts, quizzes, ongoing experiments, newspapers from around the world, videos, and much more are available at a click. Every journal has a Web site, with tables of contents, abstracts, and sometimes full texts. (An abstract gives the key findings; for the full text, you may need to consult the library’s copy of the print version.)

Unfortunately, you can spend many frustrating hours sifting through information that is useless, trash, or tangential. Directories (which list general topics or areas and then move you step by step in the direction you choose) and search engines (which give you all the sites that use a particular word or words) can help you select appropriate information. Each directory or search engine provides somewhat different lists; none provides only the most comprehensive and accurate sites. Sometimes organizations figure out ways to make their links appear first, even though they are biased. With experience and help, you will find the best sites for you, but you will also encounter some junk no matter how experienced you are.

A-3

Anybody can put anything online, regardless of its truth or fairness, so you need a very critical eye. Make sure you have several divergent sources for every “fact” you find; consider who provided the information and why. Every controversial issue has sites that forcefully advocate opposite viewpoints, sometimes with biased statistics and narrow perspectives.

Here are five Internet sites that are quite reliable:

  1. embryo.soad.umich.edu The Multidimensional Human Embryo. Presents MRI images of a human embryo at various stages of development, accompanied by brief explanations.

  2. childdevelopmentinfo.com Child Development Institute. A useful site, with links and articles on child development and information on common childhood psychological disorders.

  3. eric.ed.gov Education Resources Information Center (ERIC). Provides links to many education-related sites and includes brief descriptions of each.

  4. www.nia.nih.gov National Institute on Aging. Includes information about current research on aging (in case you want to expand your search beyond child development).

  5. www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus.htm The National Center for Health Statistics issues an annual report on health trends, called Health, United States.

Every source—you, your interviewees, journals, books, and the Internet—is helpful. Do not depend on any particular one. Avoid plagiarism and prejudice by citing every source and noting objectivity, validity, and credibility. Your own analysis, opinions, words, and conclusions are crucial, backed up by science, as explained in Chapter 1.