Grief and mourning are part of living. Humans need relationships with many others in order to survive and thrive, but every person who reaches adulthood experiences the death of someone they know. Grief can turn into depression or can become a reason to live life more deeply.
Grief is the powerful sorrow that an individual feels at the death of another. It is a highly personal emotion, an anguish that overtakes daily life.
Normal GriefThe first thing to understand about grief is that it is a normal human emotion, even when it leads to unusual actions and thoughts. Grief is manifest in uncontrollable crying, sleeplessness, and irrational and delusional thoughts—
583
Grief has no distance. Grief comes in waves, paroxysms, sudden apprehensions that weaken the knees and blind the eyes and obliterate the dailiness of life.…I see now that my insistence on spending that first night alone was more complicated than it seemed, a primitive instinct… There was a level on which I believed that what had happened remained reversible. That is why I needed to be alone… I needed to be alone so that he could come back. This was the beginning of my year of magical thinking.
[Didion, 2005, 33]
Loneliness, denial, anger, and sorrow come in rapid waves after a loved one’s death, and the normal human needs—
Complicated GriefSometimes grief takes a form that is not typical (Qualls & Kasl-
I saw this type of grief in my father. After my mother died, my brother and I tried to get him involved in activities that he could not participate in when our mother was alive and bedridden, to no avail. He became indifferent, and his self-
Another type of grief is called absent grief, when a bereaved person does not seem to grieve. This may be a first reaction, as some people cannot face the reality of the death at first, but if it continues, absent grief can trigger physical or psychological symptoms—
Absent grief may be more common in modern society than it was earlier. People who live and work where others may not know about their personal lives lack a sense of community or recognized customs to help them grieve. Indeed, for workers at large corporations or students in universities, grief becomes “an unwelcome intrusion (or violent intercession) into the normal efficient running of everyday life” (M. Anderson, 2001). This leads to isolation—
Modern life also increases the incidence of disenfranchised grief, wherein the bereaved are not allowed to mourn publicly because of cultural customs or social restrictions. For instance, typically, only a current spouse or close blood relative decides on funeral arrangements, disposal of the body, and other matters. This may result in “gagged grief and beleaguered bereavement” for others who feel a powerful emotion but cannot express it (L. Green & Grant, 2008). The deceased’s unmarried lover, a divorced spouse, young children, and close friends at work may be excluded (perhaps by the relatives, either deliberately or through ignorance) from saying goodbye to the dying person, viewing the corpse, or participating in the aftermath of death. Parents may grieve the loss of a fetus or newborn, but others may dismiss their sorrow, saying, “You never knew that child; you can have another”
Another possible complication is incomplete grief. Murders and suicides often trigger police investigations and press reports, which interfere with the grief process. An autopsy undercuts grieving, particularly if it delays or threatens cultural or religious practices associated with the afterlife of the deceased. In addition, the inability to recover a body, as happens for soldiers who are missing in action or victims of a major flood or fire, may not allow grief to be expressed and then to dissipate.
584
Sometimes events interrupt the responses of the community, for example, when a person dies on a major holiday, immediately after another death or disaster, or during wartime. In these cases, it is harder for the survivors to grieve because their social network is preoccupied with the larger event. For example, one widow whose husband died of cancer on September 10, 2001, complained, “People who attended the funeral talked only about the terrorist attack of September 11, and my husband wasn’t given the respect he deserved” (quoted in Schachter, 2003). Although she expressed concern for her husband, it is apparent that she herself needed sympathy.
Grief splinters people into jumbled pieces, making them vulnerable. Mourning reassembles them, making them whole again and able to rejoin the larger community. To be more specific, mourning is the public and ritualistic expression of bereavement, the ceremonies and behaviours that a religion or culture prescribes to honour the dead. Some mourning rituals were described earlier in the chapter. Here we focus on the purposes of mourning.
How Mourning HelpsMourning customs are designed to move grief from loss toward reaffirmation (Harlow, 2005). Eulogies that emphasize the dead person’s good qualities, and family and friends who attend wakes, funerals, or memorial services to honour the dead and comfort the survivors, are part of the reaffirmation process. If the deceased was a public figure, mourners may include thousands, even millions. They express their sorrow to one another, weep as they watch funerals on television, and pledge to affirm the best of the deceased.
585
One function of mourning is to allow expression of grief publicly and thus limit acute personal grief. Examples include the Jewish custom of sitting shiva at home for a week, the three days of active sorrow among some Muslim groups, or 10 days of ceremonies beginning at the next full moon following a death in Hinduism. Memories often return on the anniversary of a death, so many cultures include annual rituals such as visiting a grave or lighting a candle.
For many people who are unaffiliated with a religious institution, funeral services or observances have been replaced with social gatherings or celebrations of life that have less traditional structures. Whatever one’s custom or ideology, it remains important that people are able to mourn publicly and openly in the company of family, friends, or community. A deficit of mourning may undercut survivors’ ability to respond to their loss in a healthful way.
Seeking MeaningAs you may remember, denial and anger appear first on Kübler-
Mourners may also be helped by strangers who have experienced a similar loss, especially when friends are unlikely to understand. This explains why groups have been organized for parents of murdered children, mothers whose adolescents were killed by drunk drivers, families and friends of people who committed suicide, children and teens who have experienced the death of a parent, sibling, or close friend, and so on.
Mourners sometimes want the broader community to know about a death. Obituaries are found in every major newspaper and on funeral homes’ websites, and spontaneous memorials (graffiti, murals, stuffed animals, flowers) appear in public spaces, such as a spot on a roadside where a fatal crash occurred. This practice was once rare and discouraged, but no longer. Authorities realize that public commemoration aids grief and mourning, building community: Public markers of bouquets and so on are dismantled only when flowers fade and complaints are lodged after time has passed (Dickinson & Hoffmann, 2010).
Organizations devoted to causes such as fighting cancer and banning handguns find their most dedicated supporters among people who have lost a loved one to that particular circumstance. Often when someone dies, the close family designates a charity that is somehow connected to the deceased, inviting other mourners to make contributions.
In certain circumstances, to make a death meaningful, mourning may lead to public protest. For instance, when a truck killed a 9-
The impulse to seek meaning is not always constructive. A common impulse after death is for the survivors to assess blame—
In general, the normal grief reaction is intense and irrational at first, but it gradually eases as time, social support, and traditions help with the initial outpouring of emotion and then with the search for meaning and reaffirmation. The individual may engage in grief work, experiencing and expressing strong emotions and then moving toward wholeness, which includes recognizing the larger story of human life and death.
586
Bereaved people depend on the customs and attitudes of their community, as well as on their social network, to guide them through their irrational thoughts and grief. Particulars depend on the specific culture. For example, mourners who keep the dead person’s possessions, talk to the deceased, and frequently review memories are notably less well-
Legacy of Earlier LossChildhood experiences also affect bereavement. A child who lost her parents might be more distraught decades later when someone else dies. Attachment history may also be important (Hansson & Stroebe, 2007). Older adults who were securely attached may be more likely to experience normal grief; those whose attachment was insecure-
Reaffirmation does not mean forgetting the dead person; many continuing bonds are evident years after death (Stroebe et al., 2010). Although in Western nations having hallucinations of the dead person (seeing ghosts, hearing voices) is a sign of complicated grief, continuing bonds such as thinking about memories and seeing the dead person as a role model are linked to greater personal growth (Field & Filanosky, 2009). Often survivors write letters to the deceased person, or talk to them, or consider events—
587
Making Meaning After a Death
Earlier studies overestimated the frequency of pathological grief. For obvious reasons, scientists usually began research on mourning with mourners—
Furthermore, psychiatrists often studied people who needed psychological help, again for obvious reasons. Some patients experienced absent grief; others felt disenfranchised grief; some were overcome by unremitting sadness many months after the loss; still others could not find meaning in a violent, sudden, unexpected death. All these people consulted therapists, who often helped them and described the problems and the solutions.
Such mourners are not typical. Almost everyone experiences several deaths over a lifetime—
The variety of grief reactions was evident in a qualitative study in New Brunswick of 28 older Canadian widows (van den Hoonaard, 2002). The study explored the social meaning of widowhood and attitudes regarding future relationships from the perspective of women between the ages of 53 to 87 who had been widowed in the previous five years.
The majority of these women did not want to remarry. Many felt that they had already had the best possible husband. As had been found in a similar study of 319 widows and widowers in Detroit (Boerner et al., 2004, 2005), 15 of the 28 widows in New Brunswick had idealized the image of their husbands. One even claimed that her husband had been the “perfect man” This idealization of a past marriage is a normal phenomenon that other research finds connected to psychological health, not pathology (O’Rourke et al., 2010b).
Other New Brunswick widows did not wish to remarry because they did not want to suffer through the loss of another husband. Also, since many of these women were more likely to have been involved in “traditional” marriages (e.g., where the wife was responsible for household chores) in which they compromised their own priorities or scheduled their lives according to the wishes of their spouses, they did not want to involve themselves in a similar relationship.
Although many of the widows did not want to remarry, this did not mean that they wished to avoid social relationships with men. On the contrary, some wanted male companionship that was physical but not intimate—
The author of the New Brunswick study also interviewed 21 older widowers. Interestingly, all the men who participated were remarried widowers, whereas none of the widows had remarried at the time of the study. Like women, men had been concerned about entering a new relationship; they had worried about getting “trapped” by a new spouse or losing control in the relationship. However, men appeared to assume that it was important to re-
Studies such as these emphasize the importance of better understanding how individuals make social meaning of their world after a significant other has passed away. Although the sample of widows and widowers was small in the New Brunswick study, the study’s findings stress the continued complexities of social relationships in older adulthood.
Bereavement theory once held that mourners should grieve, then move on and realize that the dead person is gone forever. It was thought that if this did not happen, pathological grief could result, with the person either not grieving enough (absent grief) or grieving too long (incomplete grief). Current research finds a much wider variety of reactions.
Practical ApplicationsThe research suggests that when someone is grieving, it is common to experience powerful, complicated, and unexpected emotions. To help the griever, a friend should listen and sympathize, never implying that the person is too grief-
A bereaved person might or might not want to visit the grave, light a candle, cherish a memento, pray, or sob. He or she may want to be alone or may want company. Those who have been taught to bear grief stoically may be doubly distressed if a friend advises them to cry but they cannot. Conversely, those whose cultures expect loud wailing may resent it if they are urged to hush.
588
Even absent grief—
It may help to express emotions through a variety of actions—
No matter what rituals are followed or what pattern is evident, the result may give the living a deeper appreciation of themselves and others. In fact, a theme frequently sounded by those who work with the dying and the bereaved is that death leads to a greater appreciation of life, especially of the value of intimate, caring relationships.
George Vaillant is a psychiatrist who studied a group of men from the time they were Harvard students through old age. He writes about funerals, “With tears of remembrance running down our cheeks.…Remembered love lives triumphantly today” (Vaillant, 2008).
It is fitting to end this Epilogue, and this book, with a reminder of the creative work of living. As first described in Chapter 1, the study of human development is a science, with topics to be researched, understood, and explained. But the process of living is an art as well as a science, with strands of love and sorrow woven into each person’s unique tapestry. Death, when it leads to hope; dying, when it is accepted; and grief, when it fosters affirmation—