Body Development

Biologically, the years from ages 18 to 25 are prime time for hard physical work and safe reproduction. However, the fact that young adults can carry rocks, plow fields, or produce babies is no longer admired.

If a contemporary young couple dropped out of high school to marry and then had a new baby year after year, their neighbors would be appalled, not approving. Societies, families, and young adults themselves expect more education, later marriage, and fewer offspring than the norm a few decades ago.

By this point in your study, the previous paragraph probably raises questions in your mind, because you are well aware of cultural differences in what societies expect. Might some neighbors in some regions of the world approve of a young, fertile couple? As the following Opposing Perspectives suggests, developmentalists also ask this question.

OPPOSING PERSPECTIVES

A Welcome Stage, or Just WEIRD?

This chapter is about emerging adulthood as a stage of human development, a time for questions, exploration, and experimentation. Careful questioning allows people to choose mates and jobs carefully. But some scholars consider emerging adulthood neither beneficial nor universal. Instead, this new stage may be a cultural phenomenon for privileged youth who can afford to postpone work and family commitments.

The term emerging adulthood was coined by Jeffrey Arnett, a college professor in Missouri who listened to his own students and realized they were neither adolescents nor adults. As a good researcher, he also queried young adults of many backgrounds in other regions of the United States, he read published research about “youth” or “late adolescence,” and he thought about his own life. He decided that a new stage, requiring a new label, had appeared.

Arnett and others have now studied young adults in many Western European nations, and youth there also meet the criteria for emerging adults. For example, when Danish 20- to 30-year-olds were asked what signified adulthood, they chose marriage, parenthood, financial self-sufficiency, and independence from parents. Relatively few of those under age 25 thought that they themselves were adults (-Arnett & Padilla-Walker, 2015).

But some scientists hold an opposing perspective. They are particularly critical of any faculty member at a U.S. university who studies his or her own students and then draws conclusions about all humankind.

Conclusions based on American college students may apply only to those who are WEIRD—from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democracies (Henrich et al., 2010). Most of the world’s people are poor (even low-SES North Americans are rich by global measures), never reach college, and live in nations without regular elections. WEIRD people are unusual.

From that perspective, skewed perceptions are apparent. Indeed, referring to “the West” (North America and Western Europe) exposes a bias. Since the earth is round, people in “East Asia” (Japan, Korea, China) should call the United States “the East,” and call the Middle East (Israel, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and so on) “the Midwest.”? Arnett himself contended that too much of developmental science focuses on only 5 percent of humanity (Arnett, 2008).

391

The Canadian professor who developed the acronym WEIRD wrote, “many psychologists . . . tend to think of cross-cultural research as a nuisance, necessary only to confirm the universality of their findings (which are usually based on WEIRD undergraduates)” (Henrich, 2015, p. 86). Another critic reports that his academic colleague felt misguided to study memory among non-literate people; he thought he should have focused exclusively on college students (Cole & Vossoughi, 2015).

If WEIRD people differ in notable ways from others, that calls into question the stage of emerging adulthood that depicts young adults as autonomous and independent, forging a future untethered by parents, partners, children, or work commitments. A contrasting worldview may be especially apparent in Asia, where social interdependence—not dependence—is the ideal (Yeung & Alipio, 2013).

For example, in Thailand youth involvement with parents and community is a bulwark against drug abuse (Wongtongkam et al., 2014). Looking at the data, researchers suggest that Thai youth should be encouraged to stay home until they marry, avoiding the allure of Western independence. Perhaps emerging adulthood is a luxury stage, attained only by U.S. college students.

Some scientists have directly examined the assumption that emerging adulthood is universal. One study of personality development among youth in 62 nations found that this transition time was evident everywhere but also that the age when adulthood began was strongly affected by having a steady job. When work began early (as in Pakistan, Malaysia, and Zimbabwe), personality maturation was rapid; when work began late (as in the Netherlands, Canada, and the United States), emerging adulthood lasted many years (Bleidorn et al., 2013).

Recent research suggests that emerging adulthood is coming to every nation, not just the WEIRD ones. For example, an analysis of Chinese culture over the past 40 years finds that communal values decreased while individual competitiveness increased (Zeng & Greenfield, 2015). Evidence such as this leads most scholars to believe that, although it was first recognized in Missouri, emerging adulthood is now evident worldwide.

Consider statistics on age of first marriage. A century ago, most women married in their teens. Now in sub-Saharan Africa the average marriage age is 21 (women) and 25 (men); in East Asia, 26 and 28; in Western Europe, 31 and 33. The U.S. age of marriage has been rising every decade since 1960 and averaged 27 and 29 in 2014 (American Community Survey, 2015).

Data on childbearing, college attendance, and career commitment show similar worldwide trends. Perhaps those who do not acknowledge a time between adolescence and adulthood are stuck in the past, when economic pressure meant everyone had to become an adult by age 18.

However, consider a new risk. By bestowing a label on this period, does that imply that it is acceptable or even laudable for young people to experiment and explore in their 20s? Should they refuse to settle down, or is that WEIRD? Is a new opposing perspective needed?

Strong and Active Bodies

image

Health from ages 18 to 25 is one aspect of development that has not changed, except maybe to improve. As has been true for thousands of years, every body system—including the digestive, respiratory, circulatory, and sexual-reproductive systems—-functions optimally at the end of adolescence (see Table 11.1).

Serious diseases rarely appear, and some childhood ailments are outgrown. As young people with chronic problems such as diabetes develop their identity, their sense of who they are and what they want in life leads some to incorporate good health habits that sustain them lifelong (Schwartz et al., 2013).

image
Peak Performance Because this is a soccer match, of course we see skilled feet and strong legs—but also notice the arms, torsos, and feats of balance. Deniz Naki and Luis Gustavo, here in their early 20s, are German soccer team members in better shape than most emerging adults, but imagine these two a decade earlier or later and you will realize why, physiologically, the early 20s are considered the prime of life.

392

EXTRA CAPACITY, EXTRA BURDEN To appreciate emerging adult health, it helps to understand three aspects of body functioning: organ reserve, homeostasis, and allostatic load.

organ reserve

The extra capacity built into each organ, such as the heart and lungs, that allows a person to cope with extraordinary demands and to withstand organ strain.

Organ reserve refers to the extra power that each organ can employ when needed. Organ reserve shrinks each year of adulthood, so by old age, a strain—-shoveling snow, catching the flu, minor surgery—can overwhelm the body.

In the beginning of adulthood, however, organ reserve allows speedy recovery from physical demands. Emerging adults sometimes exercise too long, stay awake all night, or drink too much alcohol. Usually they recover quickly, unlike older adults who might be affected for days.

homeostasis

The adjustment of all the body’s systems to keep physiological functions in a state of equilibrium, moment by moment. As the body ages, it takes longer for these homeostatic adjustments to occur, so it becomes harder for older bodies to adapt to stress.

Closely related to organ reserve is homeostasis—a balance between various body reactions that keeps every physical function in sync with every other. For example, if the air temperature rises, people sweat, move slowly, and thirst for cold drinks—three aspects of body functioning that cool them. Homeostasis is quickest in early adulthood, partly because all the organs have power in reserve for sudden demands.

The next time you read about a rash of heat-wave deaths (Australia in 2014 and India and Pakistan in 2015), note the age of the victims. Because homeostasis takes longer, the body dissipates heat less efficiently with age. Sometimes the demands temporarily overwhelm the heart, kidneys, or other organs. Even middle-aged adults are less protected from temperature changes—or any other stress on the body—than emerging adults (Larose et al., 2013).

allostasis

A dynamic body adjustment, related to homeostasis, that over time affects overall physiology. The main difference is that while homeostasis requires an immediate response, allostasis requires longer-term adjustment.

Related to homeostasis is allostasis, a dynamic body adjustment that gradually changes overall physiology. The main difference between homeostasis and allostasis is time: Homeostasis requires an immediate response from body systems, whereas allostasis refers to long-term adjustment.

allostatic load

The stresses of basic body systems that combine to limit overall functioning. Higher allostatic load makes a person more vulnerable to illness.

Allostasis depends on the biological circumstances of every earlier time of life, beginning at conception. The process continues, with early adulthood conditions affecting later life, as evident in a measure called allostatic load. Although organ reserve usually protects emerging adults, the effects accumulate because some of that reserve is spent to maintain health, gradually adding to the burden on overall health.

393

Because of the protective effects of homeostasis and allostasis, few emerging adults reach the threshold that results in serious illness. However, already by early adulthood, childhood health affects metabolism, weight, lung capacity, and cholesterol. As allostatic load builds, the risk of chronic disease later in life increases.

image
A Moment or a Lifetime These three in New Delhi enjoy free pizza at the opening of the 600th Domino’s in India, just one of more than 5,000 outside the United States. Cheese and pepperoni may satisfy homeostatic drive, but they increase the allostatic load in every nation.

EXAMPLES OF LOAD AND BALANCING Consider sleep. One night’s poor sleep makes a person tired the next day—that is homeostasis, the body’s way to maintain equilibrium. But if poor sleep quality is typical every day in youth, then appetite, mood, and activity adjust (more, down, less) to achieve homeostasis, while allostatic load rises. By mid- and late adulthood, years of inadequate sleep load down overall health (McEwen & Karatsoreos, 2015; Carroll et al., 2015).

Another obvious example is nutrition. If severe malnutrition characterizes fetal or infant development, later on the person might eat too much, becoming obese. Childhood obesity increases the risk of adult obesity—not always, as Chapter 1 explains, but often.

Of course, appetite is affected by much more than fetal development. How much a person eats on a given day is affected by many factors, as the peripheral nervous system sends messages to the brain. An empty stomach triggers hormones, stomach pains, low blood sugar, and so on, all signaling that it is time to eat. If that is occasional, the cascade of homeostatic reactions makes you suddenly realize at 6 P.M. that you haven’t eaten since breakfast. Dinner becomes a priority; your body tells you that food is needed.

image
Don’t Set the Alarm? Every emerging adult sometimes sleeps too little and is tired the next day—that is homeostasis. But years of poor sleep habits reduce years of life—a bad bargain. That is allostatic load.

But if a person begins a serious diet, ignoring hunger messages for days and weeks, rapid weight loss soon triggers new homeostatic reactions, allowing the person to function with reduced calorie intake. That makes it harder to lose more weight (Tremblay & Chaput, 2012).

Over the years, allostasis is evident. If a person overeats or starves day after day, the body adjusts: Appetite increases or decreases accordingly. But that ongoing homeostasis increases allostatic load. Obesity is one cause of diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, and so on—all the result of physiological adjustment (allostasis) to daily overeating (Sterling, 2012). At the opposite extreme, allostasis allows people with anorexia to feel energetic, not hungry, but the burden on their body eventually kills them.

A third example comes from exercise. After a few minutes of exercise, the heart beats faster and breathing becomes heavier—these are homeostatic responses. Because of organ reserve, such temporary stresses on the body in early adulthood are no problem. Over time, homeostasis adjusts and allows the person to exercise longer and harder. That decreases allostatic load by reducing the health risks evident in one’s blood and weight.

The opposite is also true, as found in an impressive longitudinal study, CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Adulthood), which began with thousands of healthy 18- to 30-year-olds, many (3,154) reexamined 7 and 20 years later. Those who were the least fit at the first assessment (more than 400 of them) were four times more likely to have diabetes and high blood pressure in middle age.

In CARDIA, problems for the least fit began but were unnoticed (except in blood work) when participants were in their 20s. Organ reserve allowed them to function quite well. Nonetheless, each year their allostatic load increased, unless their daily habits changed (Camhi et al., 2013). By age 65, a disproportionate number had died.

These ideas help us understand the long-term effects of poverty, neglect, and abuse in childhood. Those problems affect all the functions of the body, impairing health in middle age even if the childhood problems stopped decades ago (Widom et al., 2015).

394

FERTILITY, THEN AND NOW As already mentioned, the sexual-reproductive system is at its strongest during emerging adulthood: Orgasms are frequent, the sex drive is powerful, erotic responses are joyful, fertility is optimal, miscarriage less common, serious birth complications unusual. Historically, most people married before age 20, had their first child within two years, and often a second and third before age 25.

That has changed dramatically. The bodies of emerging adults still crave sex, but their minds know they are not ready for parenthood. Society deems teenage pregnancy a problem, not a blessing. For emerging adults, modern contraception has provided a solution: sex without pregnancy. The world’s 2010 birth rate for 15- to 25-year-olds is half of what it was in 1960 (United Nations, 2013).

Question 11.1

OBSERVATION QUIZ

One detail in the young man’s hands suggests that the setting is Asia, not North America. What is it?

The cigarette, not the camera. Most young men in Canada and the United States do not smoke, especially publicly and casually, as this man does.

image
Anywhere In some ways, life in China is radically different from life elsewhere, but universals are also apparent. This emerging-adult couple poses in front of the Beijing stadium.

Challenges to Health

Modern medicine has prevented most young-adult deaths and many teenage pregnancies. The typical emerging adult is healthier than was true in former times. However, problems are prevalent that were rare earlier.

SEX, NOT MARRIAGE Premarital sex was once forbidden, a taboo enforced with diligent chaperoning, single-sex schools, and even the threat of death. The reason made sense: Premarital sex meant premarital pregnancy, and that was bad for society because children thrive best if both parents are committed to each other as well as to the children. In many cultures, if an unmarried woman became pregnant, the father of her child was obligated to marry her (sometimes called a shotgun wedding because her father threatened to kill the man).

However, effective contraception now allows gratification of sexual impulses without the risk of parenthood. The shotgun wedding “is rapidly becoming a relic” of another era (Jayson, 2014), evidence of a cohort change. When unmarried women today become pregnant, if they continue the pregnancy, less than 10 percent of those in the United States marry before the birth.

Society has adjusted to this new reality in many ways. One example is the demise of the single-sex college: A century ago, most private colleges were all male or all female (Miller-Bernal, 2000). In the United States as of 2015, except for religious colleges, only 3 all-male and about 30 all-female colleges continue to exist. The thousands of new colleges opening in other nations are virtually all co-ed.

Some feminists contend that, academically, women’s colleges are better, but in terms of protecting women from pregnancy, contraception has replaced segregation. Worldwide, more than 99 percent of college students enroll in co-educational institutions.

395

NEW DISEASES Fatal diseases are rare during emerging adulthood, and premarital sex without pregnancy seems a good solution to the conflict between physical and psychological maturation. However, that solution creates a new problem.

The rate of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is rising. Organ reserve and medical treatment almost always prevent death in emerging adulthood, but STIs cause infertility and later adult deaths that seem unrelated, such as from cancer and tuberculosis.

Transportation advances have unanticipated consequences. During the same years that contraception improved, travel became far easier and cheaper. In earlier times, prostitution was local, which kept STIs local as well. Now, with globalization, an STI caught in one place quickly spreads. Sex trafficking adds to the problem: Women and girls from one nation who are sent to another sometimes bring infections and sometimes catch diseases they never would have contracted at home.

This proliferation is particularly tragic with HIV/AIDS, which may have existed occasionally and locally for a hundred years. However, within 30 years, primarily because of travel and the sexual activities of young adults, HIV has become a worldwide epidemic, with more female than male victims (Fan et al., 2014).

Young adults are the prime STI vectors (those who spread disease) as well as the most common new victims. Genetic research finds that the subtypes and recombinations of HIV—once quite localized—are now present in many regions (Tatem et al., 2012).

Indeed, tracing HIV shows that it originally was confined to one city, Kinshasa, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Then it spread following the route of the railroads built as part of colonial modernization: Carriers took the disease to other nations of Africa, and later to other continents, where it had not been (Faria et al., 2014).

THINK CRITICALLY: What are the benefits and risks of other innovations, such as the cell phone, bypass surgery, frozen food, or air conditioning?

Now jets and bullet trains allow almost every young adult to wander far from home. Travel expands the mind and develops cultural understanding, but it also spreads diseases.

Taking Risks

Remember that each age group has its own gains and losses, characteristics that can be an asset or a liability. This is apparent with risk taking. Some emerging adults bravely, or foolishly, take risks—a behavior that is gender- and age-related, as well as genetic and hormonal. Those who are genetically impulsive and male and emerging adults are most likely to be brave and foolish.

In one study, 10- to 30-year-olds judged “how good or bad an idea is it to . . .” do various risky items (from riding a bicycle down the stairs to taking pills at a party) (Shulman & Cauffman, 2014). The participants had only two seconds to make a snap judgment on a sliding scale from 0 to 100. For instance, the bicycle riding could be rated at 70 (somewhat bad idea) and the pills at 99 (very bad idea). There also were eight items that were not risky at all, such as eating a sandwich.

Risky items were rated more favorably (closer to a good idea) every year from age 10 to 20 and then less favorably (closer to a bad idea) every year from age 20 to 30. Experience increased (the average 15- to 17-year-old had done four of the items; the average 20- to 25-year-old had done seven), but that did not affect how good or bad each item was thought to be. Maturation, not experience, affected the assessment of risk.

The emerging adult’s willingness to take chances sometimes is beneficial. Enrolling in college, moving to a new state or nation, getting married, having a baby—all risky. So is starting a business, filming a documentary, entering an athletic contest, enlisting in the military, or joining the Peace Corps. Emerging adults do all these more than older adults, and societies benefit.

396

DANGEROUS RISKS However, risk taking is often destructive. Although their bodies are strong and their reactions quick, emerging adults nonetheless have more serious accidents than do people of any other age (see Figure 11.1). The low rate of disease between ages 18 and 25 is counterbalanced by a high rate of violent death.

image
Figure 11.1: FIGURE 11.1 Send Them Home Accidents, homicides, and suicides occur more frequently during emerging adulthood than later. Note that the age range of more patients falls within the six years of emerging adulthood than within the 20 years of adulthood. If all the data were reported by six-year groups, the chart would be much starker. Fewer young adults stay in the hospital, however. They are usually stitched, bandaged, injected, and sent home.

Risks that are more common in emerging adulthood than any other time include unprotected sex with a new partner, driving without a seat belt, carrying a loaded gun, abusing drugs, and addictive gambling—all done partly for a rush of adrenaline (Cosgrave, 2010). In the United States, the peak age for serious crime is 19, for unintended pregnancy, 18–19, for automobile driver death, 21 (Shulman & Cauffman, 2014).

Fatal accidents, homicide, and suicide result in more deaths in emerging adulthood than all other causes combined, even in nations with high rates of infectious diseases and malnutrition. The contrast between sudden, violent deaths and slower, disease-related deaths is most stark in nations with good medical systems.

In the United States, of the 15- to 24-year-olds who died in 2013, about 71 percent came to a sudden, violent end. The leading cause of disease-related deaths was cancer, at about 6 percent. Homicide alone caused 4,481 deaths of 10- to 24-year olds—with rates highest in the early 20s—more than double the rate of cancer mortality (MMWR, February 27, 2015).

RISKY SPORTS Many young adults enjoy challenging recreation: They climb mountains, swim in oceans, run in pain, play past exhaustion, and so on. This has always been true. Marriage and parenthood slow down risk taking, so when adult responsibilities began earlier, risks were less common. But the impulse to seek danger has always been apparent in young men (think of the soldiers of the previous centuries).

Now recreational risks are more popular, including new ones advertised for hundreds of millions of emerging adults. Among such activities are skydiving, bungee jumping, pond swooping, parkour, potholing (in caves), waterfall kayaking, and ziplining. Serious injury is not the goal, but the possibility adds to the thrill.

extreme sports

Forms of recreation that include apparent risk of injury or death and are attractive and thrilling as a result.

Competitive extreme sports (such as freestyle motocross—motorcycle jumping off a ramp into “big air,” doing tricks during the fall, and hoping to land upright) are new sports for some emerging adults, who find golf, bowling, and so on too tame (Breivik, 2010).

397

A CASE TO STUDY

An Adrenaline Junkie

The fact that extreme sports are age-related is evident in Travis Pastrana, “an extreme sports renaissance man—a pro adrenaline junkie/daredevil/speed demon—whatever you want to call him” (Giblin, 2014). After several accidents that almost killed him, Pastrana won the 2006 X Games freestyle motocross competition at age 22 with a double backflip because, he explained, “The two main things are that I’ve been healthy and able to train at my fullest, and a lot of guys have had major crashes this year” (quoted in Higgins, 2006, p. D-7).

Four years later, Pastrana set a new record for leaping through big air in an automobile, as he drove over the ocean from a ramp on the California shoreline to a barge more than 250 feet out. He crashed into a barrier on the boat but emerged, seemingly ecstatic and unhurt, to the thunderous cheers of thousands of other young adults on the shore (Roberts, 2010).

In 2011, a broken foot and ankle made him temporarily halt extreme sports—but soon he returned to the acclaim of his cohort, winning races rife with flips and other hazards. In 2013, after some more serious injuries, he said he was “still a couple of surgeries away” from racing on a motorcycle, so he turned to NASCAR auto racing. In 2014, age 30, after becoming a husband and a father (twice), he quit NASCAR. He says his most hazardous race days are over. He is an icon for the next generation of daredevil young men.

image
Dangerous Pleasure Here Travis Pastrana prepares to defy death once again as a NASCAR driver. Two days later, his first child was born, and two months later, he declared his race record disappointing. At age 30 he quit, declaring on Facebook that he would devote himself to his wife and family. Is that maturation, fatherhood, or failure?

DRUG ABUSE The same impulses that are admired by the young in extreme sports also lead to actions that are clearly destructive, not only for individuals but for the community. The most studied of these are sexual risks and drug abuse.

Both promiscuity and drug use increase in emerging adulthood, which suggests that one might lead to the other. Many colleges now restrict alcohol on campus, believing this will prevent or reduce sexual assault, which tends to occur only when both parties have been drinking or drugging (Zinzow & Thompson, 2015). However, although they often co-occur, instead of alcohol leading to assault, the origin may be the impulsive and foolish risk taking that are common personality traits in these years. In Chapter 1’s terms: They correlate because of a third variable.

drug abuse

The ingestion of a drug to the extent that it impairs the user’s biological or psychological well-being.

By definition, drug abuse occurs whenever a drug (legal or illegal, prescribed or not) is used in a harmful way, damaging a person’s physical, cognitive, or psychosocial well-being. The interaction between age and drug abuse helps illustrate the nature of the emerging adult, who may be attracted rather than repulsed by the potential for harm and arrest in buying, carrying, and using an illegal drug.

Illegal drug use peaks at about age 20 and declines sharply with age (see Figure 11.2). Addiction to legal drugs (no arrest imminent) may continue in adulthood, but after age 25, most who drink and smoke to excess want to quit.

image
Figure 11.2: FIGURE 11.2 Too Old for That As you can see, emerging adults are the biggest substance abusers, but illegal drug use drops faster and sooner than does cigarette use or binge drinking.

Quitting an addictive drug is difficult at any age, but as the years go on, adults no longer enjoy the taste, the thrill, or the sensation as they once did. They use drugs to relieve anxiety, or out of habit, not primarily for pleasure. For that reason, abstinence becomes more common, a source of pride not embarrassment, after emerging adulthood (Heyman, 2013).

Drug abuse is more frequent among college students than among emerging adults who are not in college, partly because groups of emerging adults urge each other on. For instance, some hazing rituals for college fraternities involve excessive consumption of alcohol. Such forced drinking is a symptom of a general problem: One study found that 25 percent of young college men consumed 10 or more drinks in a row at least once in the previous two weeks (Johnston et al., 2009).

398

In the United States, the problem is not confined to men. A nationwide study found that 24 percent of women aged 18–25 had binged on alcohol in the past month (for women a binge is defined as four or more drinks on one occasion). That emerging adult rate was higher than the rate for either younger or older women (MMWR, January 11, 2013). Moreover, those 24 percent averaged four binge episodes per month and six drinks per occasion, both more than older female bingers. Rates rose with income.

THINK CRITICALLY: Why are wealthier emerging adults more likely to drink too much alcohol than their less wealthy contemporaries?

Many colleges try to reduce alcohol consumption and enforce age restrictions—now 21 in the United States—without success. As one review states, “more students now drink to get drunk, choose hard liquor over beer, and front-load, or drink in advance of social events. For many, the goal is to black out” (McMurtrie, 2014, p. A23). The impulse to abuse alcohol arises from the same drive as extreme sports or other risks—with the same possible consequence: death.

Video: College Binge Drinking shows college students engaging in (and rationalizing) this risky behavior.

WHAT HAVE YOU LEARNED?

Question 11.2

1. Why is maximum physical strength usually attained in emerging adulthood?

Every human body system is at optimal physical functioning during emerging adulthood. Many serious diseases have not yet developed, and some childhood ailments are outgrown. Physiologically, the early 20s are considered the prime of life.

Question 11.3

2. What has changed, and what has not changed, in the past decades regarding sexual and reproductive development?

Whereas in previous generations, when couples married around age 20 and had their first child within a few years of marriage, they are now more likely to wait to get married. This is in part due to modern contraception, which has enabled sex without marriage.

Question 11.4

3. Why are STIs more common today than they were 50 years ago?

There is a consequence of sexual freedom: the rise of STIs. The single best way to prevent STIs is lifelong monogamy, but most emerging adults practice serial monogamy, beginning a new relationship soon after one ends. At times a new sexual liaison overlaps an existing one, and sometimes a steady relationship is interspersed with a fling with someone else.

Question 11.5

4. What are the social benefits of risk taking?

Many occupations are filled with risk takers—police officers, military recruits, financial traders, etc. Facing fear is exhilarating and transformative, improving the individual’s self-esteem without harming anyone. We would all suffer if young adults were always timid, traditional, and afraid of innovation.

Question 11.6

5. Why are some sports more attractive to emerging adults than to other adults?

Emerging adults may take part in risky sports such as motocross or snowboarding because they seek an adrenaline rush. The desire to experience a thrill may also overwhelm their ability to evaluate the potential risks associated with the activity, making emerging adults less concerned with the possibility of injury or death.

Question 11.7

6. Why are serious accidents more common in emerging adulthood than later?

Many emerging adults bravely, or foolishly, risk their lives. The reasons for such risk-taking are social (showing off and vying for status) and biological (hormones, energy, and brain development).

Question 11.8

7. Why are college students more likely to abuse drugs than those who are not in college?

Drug abuse—particularly of alcohol and marijuana—is more common among college students than among their peers who are not in college. Being with peers, especially for college men, seems to encourage many kinds of drug abuse.