When you finish this section, you should be able to:
In this section, we present a method for finding the area enclosed by the graph of a function that is nonnegative on a closed interval , the -axis, and the lines and . The presentation uses summation notation (), which is reviewed in Appendix A.5.
The area of a rectangle with width and height is given by the geometry formula
See Figure 2. The graph of a constant function for some positive constant is a horizontal line that lies above the -axis. The area enclosed by this line, the -axis, and the lines and is the rectangle whose area is the product of the width and the height .
If the graph of consists of three horizontal lines, each of positive height as shown in Figure 3, the area enclosed by the graph of , the -axis, and the lines and is the sum of the rectangular areas , , and .
Approximate the area enclosed by the graph of the -axis, and the lines and .
Solution Figure 4 illustrates the area to be approximated.
We begin by drawing a rectangle of width and height The area of the rectangle, approximates the area but it underestimates as seen in Figure 5(a).
Alternatively, can be approximated by a rectangle of width and height See Figure 5(b). This approximation of the area equals , but it overestimates We conclude that
345
The approximation of the area can be improved by dividing the closed interval into two subintervals, and Now we draw two rectangles: one rectangle with width and height ; the other rectangle with width and height As Figure 6(a) illustrates, the sum of the areas of the two rectangles underestimates the area.
Now we repeat this process by drawing two rectangles,one of width and height the other of width and height . As Figure 6(b) illustrates, the sum of the areas of these two rectangles,
overestimates the area. We conclude that
obtaining a better approximation to the area.
The actual area in Figure 4 is 9 square units, obtained by using the formula for the area of a trapezoid with base and parallel heights and :
Observe that as the number of subintervals of the interval increases, the approximation of the area improves. For , the error in approximating is square unit, but for , the error is only square unit.
Problem 5.
In general, the procedure for approximating the area is based on the idea of summing the areas of rectangles. We shall refer to the area enclosed by the graph of a function , the -axis, and the lines and as the area under the graph of from to .
We make two assumptions about the function :
We divide, or partition, the interval into nonoverlapping subintervals:
346
each of the same length. See Figure 7. Since there are subintervals and the length of the interval is the common length of each subinterval is
The Extreme Value Theorem is discussed in Section 4.2, pp. xx-xx.
Since is continuous on the closed interval , it is continuous on every subinterval of . By the Extreme Value Theorem, there is a number in each subinterval where attains its absolute minimum. Label these numbers , so that is the absolute minimum value of in the subinterval Now construct rectangles, each having as its base and as its height, as illustrated in Figure 8. This produces narrow rectangles of uniform width and heights respectively. The areas of the rectangles are
The sum of the areas of the rectangles approximates the area That is,
Summation notation is discussed in Appendix A.5, pp. A-38 to A-43.
Since the rectangles used to approximate the area lie under the graph of the sum called a lower sum, underestimates . That is,
Approximate the area under the graph of from to by using lower sums (rectangles that lie under the graph) for:
(a) subintervals
(b) subintervals
(c) subintervals
Solution (a) For , we partition the closed interval into two subintervals and , each of length . See Figure 9(a). To compute , we need to know where attains its minimum value in each subinterval. Since is an increasing function, the absolute minimum is attained at the left endpoint of each subinterval. So, for the minimum of on occurs at and the minimum of on occurs at 5. The lower sum is
347
(b) For , partition the interval into five subintervals , each of length . See Figure 9(b). The lower sum is
(c) For , partition into subintervals, each of length . See Figure 9(c). The lower sum is
Problem 13(a).
In general, as Figure 10(a) illustrates, the error due to using lower sums (rectangles that lie below the graph of ) occurs because a portion of the area lies outside the rectangles. To improve the approximation of the area, we increase the number of subintervals. For example, in Figure 10(b), there are four subintervals and the error is reduced; in Figure 10(c), there are eight subintervals and the error is further reduced. So, by taking a finer and finer partition of the interval , that is, by increasing the number of subintervals, without bound, we can make the sum of the areas of the rectangles as close as we please to the actual area. (A proof of this statement is usually found in books on advanced calculus.)
In Section 5.2, we see that, for functions that are continuous on a closed interval, always exists. With this discussion in mind, we now define the area under the graph of a function from to .
348
Suppose a function is nonnegative and continuous on a closed interval . Partition into subintervals each of length
In each subinterval let equal the absolute minimum value of on this subinterval. Form the lower sums
The area under the graph of from to is the number
The area is defined using lower sums (rectangles that lie below the graph of ). By a parallel argument, we can choose values so that the height of the th rectangle is the absolute maximum value of on the th subinterval, as shown in Figure 11. The corresponding upper sums (rectangles that lie above the graph of ) overestimates the area . So, . It can be shown that as increases without bound, the limit of the upper sums equals the limit of the lower sums That is,
In the next example, instead of using a specific number of rectangles to approximate area, we partition the interval into subintervals, obtaining rectangles. By letting we find the actual area under the graph of from to
Find the area under the graph of from to using upper sums (rectangles that lie above the graph of . Then .
Solution Figure 12 illustrates the area . We partition the closed interval into subintervals
where
and each subinterval is of length
The coordinates of the endpoints of each subinterval, written in terms of are
as illustrated in Figure 13.
349
To find using upper sums (rectangles that lie above the graph of , we need the absolute maximum value of in each subinterval. Since is an increasing function, the absolute maximum occurs at the right endpoint of each subinterval. So,
Summation properties are discussed in Appendix A.5, pp. A-38 to A-43.
Using summation properties, we get
Then
The area under the graph of from to is square units.
NOTE The area found in Example 3 is that of a triangle. So, we can verify that by using the formula for the area of a triangle with base and height :
Find the area under the graph of from to by using lower sums (rectangles that lie below the graph of ). Then .
Solution Figure 14 shows the area under the graph of and a typical rectangle that lies below the graph. We partition the closed interval into subintervals
where
and each interval is of length
As Figure 15 on page 350 illustrates, the endpoints of each subinterval, written in terms of , are
350
To find using lower sums (rectangles that lie below the graph of ), we must find the absolute minimum value of on each subinterval. Since the function is a decreasing function, the absolute minimum occurs at the right endpoint of each subinterval. So,
Since and , we have
Then
The area under the graph of from to is square units.
Problem 29.
The previous two examples illustrate just how complex it can be to find areas using lower sums and/or upper sums. In the next section, we define an integral and show how it can be used to find area. Then in Section 5.3, we present the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, which provides a relatively simple way to find area.