Just as in any interpersonal relationship, conflict is an inevitable part of working in teams. Small groups experience two forms of conflict. Substantive conflict revolves around disagreements about the group’s tasks, procedures, or decision options (Rahim, 2002). Affective conflict stems from interpersonal or cultural differences between members, power struggles, or simply bad feelings (Rahim, 2002). A moderate amount of substantive conflict can help prevent groupthink, but when groups experience too much substantive conflict or get embroiled in affective conflict, it’s time for a group member to assume leadership and manage the situation.
As Chapter 8 covers, there are several possible approaches to dealing with conflict. Choosing the right approach depends on the nature and severity of the conflict. In situations involving unethical behaviors or clearly “right” courses of action, consider using a competitive approach, in which you pursue your own goals to the exclusion of others (Rahim, 2002). For ex-ample, your class group might want to ignore an assignment requirement they think is “unimportant.” Rather than avoiding a conflict and going along with the group, a leader using a competitive approach would openly listen to the group but ultimately insist that the assignment requirement be met.
In instances with too much substantive or affective conflict, a collaborative approach may be best. This approach gives everyone a say in the resolution, so they tend to view the outcome as fair. Taking a collaborative approach to managing a conflict involves applying the following practices:
In general, avoiding a conflict is not productive unless the issue is insignificant (“You’re sitting in my chair!”).