Check Your Understanding
Describe the important difference between the average propensity to consume (APC) and the marginal propensity to consume (MPC).
List the factors that influence an individual’s marginal propensity to consume.
Explain why we wouldn’t expect investment to grow sufficiently to pull the economy out of a depression.
Define the simple Keynesian multiplier. Describe why a multiplier exists.
Explain why a $100 reduction in taxes does not have the same impact on output and employment as a $100 increase in government spending.
How do injections and withdrawals into an economy affect its income and output?
Apply the Concepts
What is the MPC equal to? The MPS?
How much would government spending have to rise to move the economy to full employment?
Assume that the government plans to finance any spending by raising taxes to cover the increase in spending (it intends to run a balanced budget). How much will government spending and taxes have to rise to move the economy to full employment?
From the initial equilibrium, if investment grows by $100, what will be the new equilibrium level of income and savings?
Other than reductions in interest rates that increase the level of investment by businesses, what factors would result in higher investment at existing interest rates?
The simple aggregate expenditures model discussed in this chapter concluded that one form of spending was just as good as any other; increases in all types of spending lead to equal increases in income. Is there any reason to suspect that private investment might be better for the economy than government spending?
Assume that the economy is in equilibrium at $5,700, and full employment is $4,800. If the MPC is 0.67, how big is the inflationary gap?
How does the economy today differ from that of the Great Depression, the economy Keynes used as the basis for the macroeconomic model discussed in this chapter?
In modern politics, the word Keynesian often is synonymous with “big government” spending. Does this characterization accurately reflect the role of government in spurring economic activity? How would a tax cut be characterized today versus in Keynes’s time?
In the News
In recent years banks have encouraged their customers to save by giving incentives to join programs that automatically transfer money from checking accounts to savings accounts. For example, a bank might offer to round debit transactions to the nearest dollar, transferring the change to one’s savings account, and then boost this amount with a match up to a certain amount (“Just Save Already: Bank Gimmicks for Saving Only Sound Good,” Daily Finance, September 11, 2009). Although these programs were intended to encourage customers to save, some economists are not very enthusiastic about these programs. What reasons, both practical and theoretical, might cause some to be concerned?
The $787 billion stimulus package passed in 2009 was designed to jumpstart the economy reeling from the worst economic recession since the Great Depression by injecting the economy with large amounts of government spending (“Much Ado About Multipliers,” The Economist, September 24, 2009). Explain how this spending, as designed, was meant to create a much greater economic effect than the $787 billion spent. What factors might explain why the full economic effect of the stimulus may have fallen short of expectations?
Solving Problems
Compute the APC when income equals $2,300 and the APS when income equals $2,800.
Compute the MPC and MPS.
What does the simple Keynesian multiplier equal?
If investment spending is equal to $120, what will be equilibrium income?
Using the following graph, show saving, investment, and equilibrium income.
What are the MPC, the MPS, and the multiplier?
If the economy is currently in equilibrium at point a, and full employment income is $4,000, how much in additional expenditures is needed to move this economy to full employment? What is this level of spending called?
Assume that the economy is currently in equilibrium at point a and full employment income is $4,000. How much of a tax decrease would be required to move the economy to full employment?
According to By the Numbers, in what year (since 1973) did the U.S. government spend the most as a percentage of GDP? In what year did it spend the least? How do your answers correspond to the business cycle?
According to By the Numbers, the U.S. government spends less per person than any other developed country on the list. Does this mean that the overall size of the U.S. government is smaller than that of the other developed countries? Why or why not?