Questions: - The American lawyer Clarence Darrow said of Jonathan Edwards, “Nothing but a distorted or diseased mind could have produced his ‘Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God.’ Nothing but the puritanical, cruel generation in which he lived could have tolerated it.” And yet, we continue to read it today and consider it a classic of early American literature. What does it have to offer a modern reader? What does it tell us about the important transitions in American history? How does it connect old and new ideas, such as individual freedom versus political or clerical authority, even science versus scripture?