Access the text here.
Regarding “My Kinsman, Major Molineux”: Can we suppose that a man like Hawthorne, a man notable for his gentleness, is saying that the dark and evil impulses of the savage mob have some beneficent part in the young man’s development? Can he be telling us that the experience of evil is necessary to the understanding and practice of good, or that what is thought bad by gentle and pious people is not really, or not wholly, bad? The questions that press upon us cannot be answered with any assurance that we are responding with precise understanding to what the author means.
Do you agree that these questions cannot be answered? As a symbol, what might the kinsman, Major Molineux, represent? What might be the significance of the grotesque leader of the procession and the kindly stranger? How might Robin’s quest serve as an allegory for the development of the American character?
The ambiguity in Hawthorne’s stories is at once his triumph and, for some literalist critics, his failure. The tension it creates is a dramatic asset. Many of the tales, or romances as he thought of them, are multi-leveled ironic explorations of the human psyche—capable of endless extensions of meaning and of stimulating repeated analysis and interpretation.
Do you regard the ambiguity of Hawthorne’s work as a triumph or a failure? Explain.