Exploring the Text: - Another way to look at this poem is through a historical lens. Writing to refute a more symbolic interpretation of the poem, British poet Herbert Lomas reminds readers that the poem was written two years after the start of the Civil War, near the time of the Battle of Gettysburg (1863). He argues that the gun is literal, which, he claims, explains the final stanza: “The personified gun says it may well outlive its Master (in a gun-room and in the poem). Its Master, however, can and may well die in battle—but ‘must longer’ live than the gun: for the Owner/Master is an immortal soul, and killer of other immortal souls.” Explain why you agree or disagree with this interpretation. What other parts of the poem support or challenge this interpretation?