PROBLEMS

Question 20.1

A researcher engineers a lac operon on a plasmid, but inactivates all parts of the Lac operator (lacO) and the Lac promoter, replacing them with the binding site for the LexA repressor (which acts in the SOS response) and a promoter regulated by LexA. The plasmid is introduced into E. coli cells that have a lac operon with an inactive lacZ gene. Under what conditions will these transformed cells produce β-galactosidase?

Question 20.2

Describe the probable effects on the expression of lac genes of mutations that (a) relocate the Lac operator so that it is on the other side of the operon, (b) inactivate the binding site for CRP, and (c) alter the promoter sequence around position −10.

Question 20.3

In the ara operon, the AraC protein can act as either an activator or a repressor. If AraC remains bound to the DNA in the absence of arabinose, why does the protein not always function as an activator?

Question 20.4

E. coli cells are growing in a medium with glucose as the sole carbon source. Tryptophan is suddenly added. The cells continue to grow, and they divide every 30 minutes. Describe (qualitatively) how the levels of tryptophan synthase (an enzyme produced by the trp operon) change with time under the following conditions:

  1. The trp mRNA is stable (degraded slowly over many hours).

  2. The trp mRNA is degraded rapidly, but tryptophan synthase is stable.

  3. Both the trp mRNA and tryptophan synthase are degraded rapidly.

Question 20.5

How would the SOS response in E. coli be affected by mutations in the lexA gene that (a) prevented autocatalytic cleavage of the LexA protein or (b) weakened the interaction of LexA with its normal binding site?

Question 20.6

A typical bacterial repressor protein discriminates between its specific DNA binding site (operator) and nonspecific DNA by a factor of 104 to 106. About 10 molecules of repressor per cell are sufficient to ensure a high level of repression. Assume that a very similar repressor existed in a human cell, with a similar specificity for its binding site. How many copies of the repressor would be required to elicit a level of repression similar to that in the bacterial cell? (Hint: The E. coli genome contains about 4.6 × 106 bp; the human haploid genome has about 3.2 × 109 bp.)

Question 20.7

The dissociation constant for a particular repressor-operator complex is very low, about 10−13 m. An E. coli cell (volume 2 × 10−12 mL) contains 10 copies of the repressor. Calculate the cellular concentration of the repressor protein. How does this value compare with the dissociation constant of the repressor-operator complex? What is the significance of this answer?

Question 20.8

E. coli cells are growing in a medium containing lactose but no glucose. Indicate whether each of the following changes or conditions would increase, decrease, or not change expression of the lac operon. It may be helpful to draw a model depicting what is happening in each situation.

  1. Addition of a high concentration of glucose

  2. A mutation that prevents Lac repressor binding to the operator

  3. A mutation that completely inactivates β-galactosidase

  4. A mutation that completely inactivates galactoside permease

  5. A mutation that prevents binding of CRP to its binding site near the Lac promoter

Question 20.9

How would transcription of the E. coli trp operon be affected by the following manipulations of the leader region of the trp mRNA?

  1. Increasing the distance (number of bases) between the leader peptide gene and sequence 2

  2. Increasing the distance between sequences 2 and 3

  3. Removing sequence 4

  4. Changing the two Trp codons in the leader peptide gene to His codons

  5. Eliminating the ribosome-binding site for the gene that encodes the leader peptide

  6. Changing several nucleotides in sequence 3 so that it can base-pair with sequence 4 but not with sequence 2

Question 20.10

Many riboswitches have been characterized in bacteria, including one that binds to thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP) and another that binds to glucosamine 6-phosphate. Compare and contrast the mechanisms by which these two riboswitches inhibit translation of their RNAs.

Question 20.11

A mutation is found in the gene encoding the translational repressor of an r-protein operon. The mutation increases the affinity of the repressor protein for mRNA and decreases its affinity for rRNA. What is the likely effect of such a mutation?

725

Question 20.12

A λ phage lysogen (an E. coli cell with a λ prophage integrated into its genome) is largely immune to lysis by λ phages introduced into the cell later. Explain.

Question 20.13

Mutant versions of CRP have been isolated that bind DNA normally but do not activate transcription. What does the existence of these mutants indicate about the mechanism of CRP-mediated transcription activation, and what phenotype would you expect to observe for cells expressing one of these mutant CRP alleles?

Question 20.14

How does the organization of related genes into operons enable the coordinated production of proteins? Suggest a way that would allow different genes in an operon to be expressed at different levels.

Question 20.15

Name one advantage and one disadvantage to using RNA structures such as riboswitches to regulate gene expression in response to small-molecule effectors.

Question 20.16

What general principle of gene regulation is illustrated by transcription attenuation?

Question 20.17

Would you expect the mechanism of transcription attenuation described for the trp operon to function similarly in eukaryotic cells? Why or why not?

Question 20.18

Name three properties of riboswitch-regulated mRNAs.

Question 20.19

How would a large increase in the intracellular concentration of ppGpp affect the growth of bacterial cells in a nutrient-rich medium?