EXAMPLE 5 Hypothesis test for the slope using the -value method and technology
shortmemory
Time | Score |
---|---|
1 | 9 |
1 | 10 |
2 | 11 |
3 | 12 |
3 | 13 |
4 | 14 |
5 | 19 |
6 | 17 |
7 | 21 |
8 | 24 |
In Section 4.3, we considered a study on short-term memory. Ten subjects were given a set of nonsense words to memorize within a certain amount of time and were later scored on the number of words they could remember. The results are repeated here in Table 4. Use the -value method and technology to test, using level of significance , whether a linear relationship exists between time and score.
Solution
We begin by verifying the regression assumptions. The scatterplot of the residuals versus the fitted values in Figure 8 shows no strong evidence that the independence assumption, the constant variance assumption, or the zero-mean assumption is violated. Also, the normal probability plot of the residuals in Figure 9 offers evidence of the normality of the results. Therefore, we conclude that the regression assumptions are verified, and proceed with the hypothesis test.
Step 1 State the hypotheses and the rejection rule.
724
The rejection rule is: reject if the .
Step 2 Calculate .
From page 226 in Section 4.3, we have . From Example 13 in Chapter 4 on page 228, we have
From the TI-83/84 summary statistics, we have the standard deviation of the (time) data to be . Thus, using the relationship we learned in Example 3:
Therefore,
Step 3 Find the -value. For instructions, see the Step-by-Step Technology Guide on page 730. The regression results (including the -value) for the TI-83/84, Excel, Minitab, and CrunchIt! are shown in Figures 10, 11, 12, and 13. (Differing results are due to rounding.)
725
Step 4 The -value of about , so we reject . Evidence exists, at level of significance , for a linear relationship between time and score.
NOW YOU CAN DO
Exercises 19–22.