EXAMPLE 14 The -value method using technology: Two-tailed test
brisbane
The birth weights, in grams (1000 grams = 1 kilogram ≈ 2.2 pounds), of a random sample of 44 babies from Brisbane, Australia, have a sample mean weight . Formerly, the mean birth weight of babies in Brisbane was 3200 grams. Assume that the population standard deviation grams. Is there evidence that the population mean birth weight of Brisbane babies now differs from 3200 grams? Use technology to perform the appropriate hypothesis test, with level of significance .
What Results Might We Expect?
Note from Figure 8 that the sample mean birth weight grams is close to the hypothesized mean birth weight of grams. This value of is not extreme and thus does not seem to offer strong evidence that the hypothesized mean birth weight is wrong. Therefore, we might expect to not reject the hypothesis that grams.
Solution
The sample size is large and is known, so we may proceed with the test for .
Step 1 State the hypotheses and the rejection rule.
The key words “differs from” mean that we have a two-tailed test:
where refers to the population mean birth weight of Brisbane babies. We will reject if the .
Step 2 Calculate .
We will use the instructions provided in the Step-by-Step Technology Guide at the end of this section (page 519). Figure 9 shows the TI-83/84 results from the test for :
513
Figure 10 shows the Minitab results, where
refers to our test statistic:
Different software rounds the results to different numbers of decimal places.
Figure 11 shows the JMP results, where
Step 3 Find the -value.
We have a two-tailed test from Step 1, so that from Table 5 our -value is (Figure 12)
514
Step 4 State the conclusion and interpretation.
Because 0.3396 is not ≤ 0.10, we do not reject . There is insufficient evidence that the population mean birth weight differs from 3200 grams. This conclusion is just as we expected.
NOW YOU CAN DO
Exercises 27–30.