Example 21

EXAMPLE 21 Test using the -value method: Two-tailed test

The Golden Ratio

Figure 9.30: FIGURE 25a The golden ratio.

Figure 9.31: FIGURE 25b The Parthenon follows the golden ratio.

Euclid's Elements, the Parthenon, the Mona Lisa, and the beadwork of the Shoshone tribe all have in common an appreciation for the golden ratio.

Suppose we have two quantities and , with . Then is called the golden ratio if

that is, if the ratio of the sum of the quantities to the larger quantity equals the ratio of the larger to the smaller (see Figure 25a).

Euclid wrote about the golden ratio in his Elements, calling it the “extreme and mean ratio.” The ratio of the width and height of the Parthenon, one of the most famous temples in ancient Greece, equals the golden ratio (Figure 25b). If you enclose the face of Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa in a rectangle, the resulting ratio of the long side to the short side follows the golden ratio (Figure 26). The golden ratio has a value of approximately 1.618.

Now, we will test whether evidence exists for the use of the golden ratio in the artistic traditions of the Shoshone, a Native American tribe from the American West. Figure 27 shows a detail of a nineteenth-century Shoshone beaded dress that belonged to Nahtoma, the daughter of Chief Washakie of the Eastern Shoshone.⁷ It is intriguing to consider whether the Shoshone beaded rectangles, such as those on this dress, follow the golden ratio. Table 10 contains the ratios of lengths to widths of 18 beaded rectangles made by Shoshone artisans.⁸ We will perform a hypothesis test to determine whether the population mean ratio of Shoshone beaded rectangles equals the golden ratio of 1.618.

532

Figure 9.32: FIGURE 26 Mona Lisa's face follows the golden ratio.

Figure 9.33: FIGURE 27 Beaded dress of Nahtoma, daughter of Chief Washakie of the Eastern Shoshone, showing rectangles that may follow the golden ratio.

shoshone

Table 9.24: Table 10 Ratio of length to width of a sample of Shoshone beaded rectangles

1.44	1.75	1.64	1.66	1.64
1.51	1.34	1.53	1.74	1.81
1.45	1.49	1.63	1.49
1.65	1.59	1.50	1.65

Solution

The population standard deviation for such rectangles is unknown, so we must use a test instead of a test. Our sample size is not large, so we must assess whether the data are normally distributed. Figure 28 shows the normal probability plot, indicating acceptable support for the normality assumption. We proceed with the test, using level of significance .

Figure 9.34: FIGURE 28 Normal probability plot.

We use the TI-83/84 and CrunchIt! to perform this hypothesis test, using the Step-by-Step Technology Guide at the end of this section.

Step 1 State the hypotheses and the rejection rule.

We are interested in whether the population mean length-to-width ratio of Shoshone beaded rectangles equals the golden ratio of 1.618, so we perform a two-tailed test:

where represents the population mean length-to-width ratio of Shoshone beaded rectangles. We will reject if the .

533
Step 2 Find .

Using the statistics from Figure 29a, we have the test statistic
Step 3 Find the -value.

From Figures 29a, 29b, and 30, we have
Step 4 State the conclusion and interpretation.

Because is , we do not reject . Thus, there is insufficient evidence, at level of significance , that the population mean ratio differs from 1.618. In other words, the data do not reject the claim that Shoshone beaded rectangles follow the same golden ratio exhibited by the Parthenon and the Mona Lisa.

Figure 9.35: FIGURE 29a TI-83/84 results.

Figure 9.36: FIGURE 29b CrunchIt! results.

Figure 9.37: FIGURE 30 -Value for two-tailed test is sum of two tail areas.

NOW YOU CAN DO

Exercises 21–26.