section 10.1
1. Assume that a sample of differences for the matched pairs in the table follows a normal distribution, and perform Steps (a) and (b).
Subject | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample 1 | 100.7 | 110.2 | 105.3 | 107.1 | 95.6 | 109.9 | 112.3 | 94.7 |
Sample 2 | 104.4 | 112.5 | 105.9 | 111.4 | 99.8 | 109.9 | 115.7 | 97.7 |
10.99.1
(a) ˉxd=−2.6875, sd=1.6146 (b) (–4.0376, –1.3374)
2. For the data in Exercise 1, test whether μd<0, using the critical-value method and level of significance α=0.05.
3. For the data in Exercise 1, test whether μd,0, using the p-value method and level of significance α=0.05.
10.99.3
H0:μd=0 vs. Ha:μd<0. Reject H0 if p-value<0.05.tdata=−4.708. p–value=0.0010939869. Since the p–value≤0.05, we reject H0. There is evidence that the population mean of the differences is less than 0.
section 10.2
Refer to the following summary statistics for two independent samples for Exercises 4–7.
Sample 1 | n1=36 | ˉx1=14.4 | s1=0.01 |
Sample 2 | n2=81 | ˉx2=14.3 | s2=0.02 |
4. We are interested in constructing a 95% confidence interval for μ1−μ2. Explain why it is appropriate to do so.
5. Provide the point estimate of the difference in population means μ1−μ2.
10.99.5
0.1
6. Calculate the margin of error for a confidence level of 95%.
7. Construct and interpret a 95% confidence interval for μ1−μ2.
10.99.7
(0.094, 0.106). We are 95% confident that the interval captures the difference in population means.
8. A random sample of 49 young persons with college degrees had a mean salary of $30,000 with a standard deviation of $5000. An independent random sample of 36 young persons without college degrees had a mean salary of $25,000 and a standard deviation of $4000.
section 10.3
9. The Centers for Disease Control, in their Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, reported that 641 of 823 new mothers living in Florida and 658 of 824 new mothers living in North Carolina took their babies in for a checkup within one week of delivery.22
10.99.9
(a) (–0.0715, 0.0322) (b) Since the p–value = 0.3320 is not ≤ 0.01, we do not reject H0. There is insufficient evidence that the population proportion of new mothers in Florida who took their babies in for a checkup within one week of delivery is different from the proportion of new mothers in North Carolina who took their babies in for a checkup within one week of delivery.
section 10.4
For Exercises 10 and 11, assume that the populations are normally distributed. Perform the indicated hypothesis tests using the critical-value method.
10. H0:σ1=σ2 vs. Ha:σ1>σ2,α=0.01,n1=55,n2=107,s1=20.2,s2=5.6
11. H0:σ1=σ2 vs. Ha:σ1<σ2,α=0.05,n1=125,n2=27,s1=5.7,s2=10.2
10.99.11
H0:σ1=σ2 vs. Ha:σ1<σ2.Fcrit=F1−α,n1−1,n2−1=F0.95,124,26=0.6173. Reject H0 if Fdata≤0.6173. Fdata=0.3123. Since Fdata=0.3123 is ≤ 0.6173, we reject H0. There is evidence at the α=0.05 level of significance that the population standard deviation of Population 1 is less than the population standard deviation of Population 2.
For Exercises 12 and 13, assume that the populations are normally distributed. Perform the indicated hypothesis tests using the p-value method for each exercise.
12. H0:σ1=σ2 vs. Ha:σ1>σ2,α=0.05,n1=1050,n2=250,s1=10.4,s2=4.6
13. H0:σ1=σ2 vs. Ha:σ1<σ2,α=0.01,n1=150,n2=80,s1=25.1,s2=35.8
10.99.13
H0:σ1=σ2 vs. Ha:σ1<σ2. Reject H0 if the p–value≤0.01. Fdata=0.4916. p–value=0.0001. Since the p–value=0.0001 is ≤ 0.01, we reject H0. There is evidence at the α=0.01 level of significance that the population standard deviation of Population 1 is less than the population standard deviation of Population 2.