Section 14.6 Exercises

CLARIFYING THE CONCEPTS

Question 14.117

1. What is the rank correlation test used for? (p. 14-44)

Question 14.118

2. Describe three advantages and one disadvantage to using the rank correlation test. (p. 14-45)

Question 14.119

3. Is the rank correlation test used for dependent or independent samples? Explain. (p. 14-46)

Question 14.120

4. The test statistic is based on the calculation of the sum of the squared differences of the ranks, . Explain the steps involved in calculating . (p. 14-45)

Question 14.121

5. What is the general form for the hypotheses for the rank correlation test? (p. 14-46)

Question 14.122

6. In Chapter 13, we found that linear regression was not appropriate when the relationship between the variables was not linear. Does this condition also hold true for the rank correlation test? (p. 14-48)

Question 14.123

7. Suppose that two Olympic judges each rank five figure skaters from 1 through 5, and their rankings are exactly the same. What is the value of the sum of the squared differences ? What is the value of the test statistic ? (p. 14-45, 14-46)

Question 14.124

8. Based on your answer to Exercise 7, what is the conclusion of the rank correlation test for association between the two judges? Explain. (p. 14-47)

PRACTICING THE TECHNIQUES

image CHECK IT OUT!

To do Check out Topic
Exercises 9–12 Example 19 Calculating the test
statistic for the rank
correlation test
Exercises 13–20 Example 20 Performing the rank
correlation test

For Exercises 9–12, you are given random samples of paired data. Do the following:

  1. Rank the data within each sample, using our convention for handling ties.
  2. Calculate the sum of the squared differences of the ranks, .
  3. Compute the value of the test statistic

Question 14.125

9.

Sample 1 7 1 1 0 4 3
Sample 2 6 1 6 9 9 10

Question 14.126

10.

Sample 1 8 10 2 9 9 7
Sample 2 6 3 7 2 9 4

Question 14.127

11.

Sample 1 25 21 28 28 19 25 27 20
Sample 2 60 62 65 70 64 69 58 69

Question 14.128

12.

Sample 1 31 29 24 24 27 20 37 32
Sample 2 38 59 54 70 54 60 54 52

For Exercises 13–16, find the critical value .

Question 14.129

13. Use the data from Exercise 9 and level of significance .

Question 14.130

14. Use the data from Exercise 10 and level of significance .

Question 14.131

15. Use the data from Exercise 11 and level of significance .

Question 14.132

16. Use the data from Exercise 12 and level of significance .

For Exercises 17–20, perform the rank correlation test for the indicated data sets.

  1. State the hypotheses.
  2. Find the critical value and state the rejection rule.

    14-53

  3. Calculate the test statistic .
  4. State the conclusion and the interpretation.

Question 14.133

17. Use the data and test statistic from Exercise 9, level of significance , and from Exercise 13.

Question 14.134

18. Use the data and test statistic from Exercise 10, level of significance , and from Exercise 14.

Question 14.135

19. Use the data and test statistic from Exercise 11, level of significance , and from Exercise 15.

Question 14.136

20. Use the data and test statistic from Exercise 12, level of significance , and from Exercise 16.

APPLYING THE CONCEPTS

Question 14.137

presidents

21. Ranking the Presidents. A study asked a randomly selected group of liberal historians and a randomly selected group of conservative historians to rank the presidents of the United States since George Washington.12 Interestingly, both groups agreed on the top five presidents, but the rankings were not exactly the same. The rankings for the top five are shown here. Test whether a rank correlation exists between the liberal ranks and the conservative ranks, using level of significance . Note that you need not calculate the ranks, as the ranks are given.

President Liberal rank Conservative
rank
Abraham Lincoln 1 1
George Washington 3 2
Franklin Roosevelt 2 3
Thomas Jefferson 4 4
Theodore Roosevelt 5 5

Question 14.138

bestbusiness

22. Best Countries for Business. The Web site www.doingbusiness.org publishes rankings on the best countries for doing business. The following data set represents a random sample of nations and their rankings in two categories: ease of doing business and ease of starting up a new business. Test whether a rank correlation exists between the two categories, using level of significance . Note that you need not calculate the ranks, as the ranks are given.

Nation Ease of doing
business
Ease of starting
a new business
Ireland 2 2
Japan 4 6
Canada 3 1
South Africa 5 4
United States 1 3
Mongolia 7 5
Mexico 6 7

Question 14.139

collegefootball

23. College Football. Different polls do not all show the same rankings for the best teams in college football. The table contains the points (calculated by votes received) for the top 24 teams for the 2013 season in the Associated Press (AP) poll and the USA Today poll. Test whether a rank correlation exists between the two polls, using level of significance .

College AP Poll USA Today Poll
Florida State 1500 1475
Auburn 1428 1388
Michigan State 1385 1375
South Carolina 1247 1219
Missouri 1236 1200
Oklahoma 1205 1189
Alabama 1114 1086
Clemson 1078 1091
Oregon 974 975
UCF 959 865
Stanford 936 872
Ohio State 816 872
Baylor 778 796
LSU 717 719
Louisville 693 703
UCLA 632 597
Oklahoma State 598 587
Texas A&M 459 443
USC 299 313
Notre Dame 256 125
Arizona State 255 302
Wisconsin 245 266
Duke 190 202
Vanderbilt 117 180

Question 14.140

populationarea

24. Population and Area. Does an association exist between the size (in square miles) of a nation and the number of people who live in that nation (the population)? The following data set represents a random sample of 12 countries and their areas and populations. Test whether a rank correlation exists between area and population, using level of significance .

Nation Area
(square miles)
Population
Bangladesh 55,598 147,365,352
United States 3,718,691 298,444,215
China 3,705,386 1,313,973,713
India 1,269,338 1,095,351,995
Greece 50,942 10,688,058
Canada 3,855,081 33,098,932
Japan 145,882 127,463,611
Kazakhstan 1,049,150 15,233,244
Mexico 761,602 107,449,525
Saudi Arabia 756,981 27,019,731
Singapore 267 4,492,150
Australia 2,967,893 20,264,082

14-54

Question 14.141

gameranking

25. Video Game Ranking. GameRankings.com publishes summary statistics for reviews of video games. The following data set represents a random sample of video games and their average reviewer score for the PlayStation 3 platform and the Xbox 360 platform, as of January 23, 2009. Test whether a rank correlation exists between the two game platforms, using level of significance .

Game PlayStation 3
mean reviewer
score
Xbox 360
mean reviewer
score
Grand Theft Auto IV 0.9373 0.9656
BioShock 0.9403 0.9525
Call of Duty 4:
Modern Warfare
0.9378 0.9416
Rock Band 0.9119 0.9225
The Orange Box 0.8838 0.9624
Guitar Hero III:
Legends of Rock
0.8390 0.8622

Question 14.142

environmentalco

26. Environmental Scores. Greenpeace International publishes its rankings of the major manufacturers of electronics, according to their policies on toxic chemicals, recycling, and climate change. The following data set represents the scores received for a random sample of companies in Greenpeace's September 2008 report and their November 2008 report. Higher scores mean that the company is more environmentally responsible in these areas. Test whether a rank correlation exists between the two reports, using level of significance .

Electronics
company
September
2008 score
November
2008 score
Nokia 7.0 6.9
Toshiba 4.7 5.9
Samsung 5.7 5.9
Microsoft 2.2 2.9
Motorola 3.7 5.3
Sharp 3.1 4.9
Dell 4.7 4.7
Philips 4.3 4.1

Question 14.143

communitycollege

27. Community Colleges. The following data set represents the results of the Washington Monthly's ranking of the top 30 community colleges in the nation. Two rankings are provided: the first for overall quality and the second for tuition and fees. Test whether a rank correlation exists between the two variables, using level of significance . You need to calculate the ranks for the “tuition and fees” variable, but not for the “overall quality” variable.

Community college Rank of
overall
quality
Tuition
and fees
Atlanta Technical College, GA 1 $1362
Cascadia Community College, WA 2 $2642
Southern Univ. at Shreveport, LA 3 $2252
Southwestern CC, NC 4 $1171
Hazard CC, KY 5 $2616
North Florida Community College,
FL
6 $1910
Indianhead College, WI 7 $2912
Southeast Kentucky CC, KY 8 $2760
Zane State College, OH 9 $3849
Baldwin College, GA 10 $2098
Texas State Technical College,
Marshall, TX
11 $3930
Lake City CC, FL 12 $2979
Itasca CC, MN 13 $4590
South Piedmont CC, NC 14 $1319
Vermilion CC, MN 15 $4366
Hawaii CC, HI 16 $1478
Ellsworth CC, IA 17 $3108
Chipola College, FL 18 $2137
Martin CC, NC 19 $1302
Texas State Technical College, TX 20 $3105
South Texas College, TX 21 $1996
Skagit Valley College, WA 22 $2712
Valencia CC, FL 23 $2091
MiraCosta College, CA 24 $590
Florida CC at Jacksonville, FL 25 $1714
New Hampshire CC, NH 26 $5464
Frank Phillips College, TX 27 $2766
Mesabi Range CC, MN 28 $4174
Northwest Vista College, TX 29 $2292
New Mexico University Grants, NM 30 $1320

Question 14.144

ageweight

28. Age and Weight. The relationship between age and weight is nonlinear, so that linear regression should not be used to test for the relationship. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published a case study regarding a particular child, recording the age and weight of this child at various intervals. Assume that the data set represents a random sample. Use the rank correlation test to test for a relationship between age and weight, using level of significance .

14-55

Age of child
in months
Weight
in ounces
0 103
1 152
3 194
4 229
6 276
8 276
10 288
12 304
15 319
18 334
24 359
30 394
Table 14.92: Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Question 14.145

cigarettecancer

29. Cigarettes and Bladder Cancer. A study examined the relationship between the number of cigarettes smoked and various types of cancer.13 The relationship between bladder cancer and the number of cigarettes may involve a nonlinear component. The following data set is a random sample of U.S. states, along with the number of deaths from bladder cancer per 100,000 people and the number of cigarettes smoked in hundreds per capita. Use the rank correlation test to test for a relationship between the number of deaths from bladder cancer and the per capita number of cigarettes smoked, using level of significance .

State Cigarettes per
capita (100s)
Deaths from
bladder cancer per
100,000 people
Kansas 21.84 2.91
Washington 21.17 4.04
Oklahoma 23.44 2.93
Maryland 25.91 5.21
Texas 20.08 2.94
Louisiana 21.58 4.65
Massachusetts 26.92 4.69
Rhode Island 29.18 4.99
Florida 28.27 4.46
Alaska 30.34 3.46