Chapter 21. Chapter 21: Agriculture: Raising Livestock

What agricultural policies have been pursued in the United States...?

Interactive Study Guide
false
true
Chapter 21 thumbnail

Guiding Question 21.4

What agricultural policies have been pursued in the United States, and what practices do they promote? What policy recommendations does the FAO make regarding livestock rearing choices?

Why You Should Care

Laws passed during the Great Depression, especially the U.S. Farm Bill, were originally intended to protect the interests of small-scale farmers by paying them to produce less. This may not make a lot of sense at first, but in times of surplus, producing less will keep demand and profits higher than producing all that one's farm will allow. That means that farmers make more money and can stay in business. However, somewhere along the way, the system began to break down. Loopholes and changes in the Farm Bill and other policies began to subsidize farmers producing too much or producing at greater cost than their crops were worth. Eventually, industries began to take advantage of the surplus of artificially inexpensive corn, soybeans, and other “commodity crops.” They found ways to turn corn into convenience and snack foods, and feeding cattle grain rather than grass became standard practice. The origin of the CAFO method, then, became a viable option because companies could purchase corn at less than cost and use it to grow more beef in less space. Helping this effort were gaps in drug and environmental policies that allowed CAFO owners to use antibiotics almost indiscriminately and to avoid treating animal waste with the stringent standards set for municipal wastewater. Some of these policies have recently been changed, so it will be interesting to see if CAFO methods will become more environmentally responsible. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization recommends just that. It is the FAO's recommendation that wealthy nations such as the United States, where the nutritional needs of citizens have largely been met, should focus policies on reducing the environmental impact of meat production. This would mean a shift to more grass-fed meat and perhaps an education campaign about the advantages of non-industrial methods.

Infographic 21.6

Question 21.1

What are the two pairs of opposing concerns one must consider when drawing up agricultural policy presented in this graph? (Choose two)

a. Food security vs. environmental concerns wg8JNehuALfILP6S

b. Food security vs. food Safety 3hMJDRP6OS+3EJIb

c. Food safety vs. livelihood wg8JNehuALfILP6S

d. Food safety vs. environmental concerns 3hMJDRP6OS+3EJIb

1
Correct.
Incorrect.

Question 21.2

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
999
Try again.
Correct.
Incorrect.

Question 21.3

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
999
Try again.
Correct.
Incorrect.

Question 21.4

Aoe6o60xYJDEMpCEXr2DZGa35I6Z+5JasEsT5AvGT6q9dUSjfowzZo+THA/k75av+aJ04Zukdltsz2JEkOV1tvEd4jed4xjfulTkgxynOLFx4M6+jv2iJkNbtinQI1hzvZFm9Lp0LiRvnyQ+m3ZY/z+YKLFAtueOQM2JVUhgcY6C3wlxQ/1vioYSeVQFUSMe0qwZWdXvhvJ1ljn17ms7WXzXwNuFOj3VFZ/TB6Bw5w73NcNBvP4tJGTHGuw8pew7eCUkWntn/Nb65qgVlXdqluqbwR7Uc2PKIJzhxcnShsDTchccz7BKPErutRtIPcU7pt1PWz8hy91XIFRC5bjPBA==
999
Try again.
Correct.
Incorrect.

Question 21.5

zdxBcyshF3EzgvAGE4Ewj7sAqcMA4gl01X2UwX7lWzlLfuym6H79gdQ9K9T64mwikIxFx7lDX0PRf4o0MftexWw9iv3sYlQnKy87jemWuXAiG1y2AOXoQLa7JulWopFysbTnqpGqWKC4gAYn8chVqBaDuniD4rVwM49SGhInskAxjBaNC61EZ2HtKJB6tPYsuRWsKjkFpoXNL8LWmtMgHZpyq6MndH+cCcyd4GeQDIWJ1BIcuHbW8fq1ZAZRSZgHFXub+Prg26bR5vG/cS/KMeFW0K/8OhJ32yx+N8TsGLDEFVcyYmZPLI3LjBxrprw9knjfN9IIguOkJcv0LYruCrkWzbd7nder
In post-industrial countries, food security—having a reliable and adequate source of food—is not a concern for most citizens: It has long been taken care of by past policies and practices. Many of those practices, however, may not always produce food that is safe for consumption—as evidenced by E. coli outbreaks in the United States. It is therefore logical to shift focus to maintaining food-production practices that are safe. In the least-developed countries, having a secure source of enough food for one’s family is common and takes priority over whether or not the production of that food is 100% safe. It is here that one finds the hidden ethical issue: Is it ethical to expect the less affluent to put themselves more at risk for consuming unsafe food simply because they are less able to afford or find enough food?