Table : TABLE 9.2
Comparing Theories of Intelligence
TheorySummaryStrengthsOther Considerations
Spearman’s general intelligence (g)A basic intelligence predicts our abilities in varied academic areas.Different abilities, such as verbal and spatial, do have some tendency to correlate.Human abilities are too diverse to be encapsulated by a single general intelligence factor.
Gardner’s multiple intelligencesOur abilities are best classified into eight or nine independent intelligences, which include a broad range of skills beyond traditional school smarts.Intelligence is more than just verbal and mathematical skills. Other abilities are equally important to our human adaptability.Should all of our abilities be considered intelligences? Shouldn’t some be called less vital talents?
Sternberg’s triarchic theoryOur intelligence is best classified into three areas that predict real-world success: analytical, creative, and practical.These three domains can be reliably measured.

1. These three domains may be less independent than Sternberg thought and may actually share an underlying g factor.

2. Additional testing is needed to determine whether these domains can reliably predict success.

Emotional intelligenceSocial intelligence is an important indicator of life success. Emotional intelligence is a key aspect, consisting of perceiving, understanding, managing, and using emotions.The four components that predict social success.Does this stretch the concept of intelligence too far?