EXAMPLE 2 Paradoxical Behavior Under the Democratic Delegate Selection Rules

Suppose that the Democratic Delegate Selection Rules are used to allocate five delegates in a district for vote totals given in Table 12.3. The application of the rules results in Jones, Umberto, and Viktor receiving 4, 1, and 0 delegates, respectively. If the election official forgets to drop Viktor for receiving less than 15% of the vote and instead uses Steps 3 to 5 on the original/non-adjusted data, then the outcome changes, as given in Table 12.4: Jones now receives 3 delegates and Umberto receives 2. Viktor still fails to receive a single delegate. But how the five delegates are split between Jones and Umberto changes depends on whether or not Viktor’s votes are discarded or not! By eliminating Viktor from consideration by the 15% rule, Umberto’s delegate count decreases from 2 to 1.

Table 12.3: TABLE 12.3 Implementing the Democratic Delegate Selection Rules for Example 2
Candidates Popular
Vote
Percentage
of Votes
Remaining
Votes
Adjusted
Percentage
Quota Initial
Delegates
Final
Delegates
Stephen Jones 6625 66.25 6625 70.479 3.524 3 4
Tracey Umberto 2775 27.75 2775 29.521 1.476 1 1
George Viktor 600 6
Totals 10,000 100 9400 100 5 4 5
Table 12.4: TABLE 12.4 Using Steps 3 to 5 to Award Delegates for Example 2
Candidates Popular
Vote
Percentage
of Votes
Quota Initial
Delegates
Final
Delegates
Stephen Jones 6625 66.25 3.313 3 3
Tracey Umberto 2775 27.75 1.387 1 2
George Viktor 600 6 0.300
Totals 10,000 100 5 4 5