Question 14.72

image 42. In a 1991 federal lawsuit, Massachusetts v. Mosbacher, Massachusetts claimed that the Hill-Huntington method of apportionment is unconstitutional because it does not reflect the “one person, one vote” principle as well as the Webster method does. Would Massachusetts have gained a seat from Oklahoma if the Webster method had been used to apportion the House of Representatives in 1991? In your calculation, use the following populations and Hill-Huntington apportionments: Massachusetts was apportioned 10 seats for a population of 6,029,051, and Oklahoma was apportioned 6 seats for a population of 3,157,604.