Chapter 7 HEADLINE: Mexico: The New China
Some American companies have found it advantageous to establish production activities closer to the United States, such as in Mexico, in what is called quicksourcing.
In November I quit my job as the editor of Wired to run 3D Robotics, the San Diego–based drone company I started with a partner as a side project three years ago. We make autopilot technology and small aircraft—both planes and multirotor copters—that can fly by themselves. The drones, which sell for a few hundred bucks, are for civilians: they don’t shoot anything but photographs and videos. And they’re incredibly fun to build (which we do with the ample help of robots). It wasn’t a hard decision to give up publishing for this.
But my company, like many manufacturers, is faced with a familiar challenge: its main competitors are Chinese companies that have the dual advantages of cheap labor and top-notch engineering. So, naturally, when we were raising a round of investment financing last year, venture capitalists demanded a plausible explanation for how our little startup could beat its Chinese rivals. The answer was as much a surprise to the investors as it had been to me a few years earlier: Mexico. In particular, Tijuana.
The notion that Mexico offers only cheap labor is just plain off the mark. … That’s because [Tijuana] isn’t so much about outsourcing as it is quicksourcing. And that’s also the way to create thousands of good jobs in the United States. . . . First, a shorter supply chain means that a company can make things when it wants to, instead of solely when it has to. . . . Second, there’s less risk. If we make an error in a design, we’ve wasted at most a few days’ worth of production. If there’s something wrong in the production process itself, we can spot it fast. We control the component inventory, so we can see what’s going into our goods … Third, it’s simply faster. … Finally, a short supply chain is an incentive to innovate. . . . when you’re doing just-in-time manufacturing, you can change the product every day if you want—whether to take advantage of some better or cheaper component or to improve the design. . . .
Whether factors like these are enough to turn American businesses from outsourcers to quicksourcers remains an open question. But I’m betting my money that they will.
Source: Chris Anderson, “Mexico: The New China,” The New York Times, September 27, 2013, p. 7.
Question 1
What does “quicksourcing” suggest about the trends in outsourcing?
65FRbtvWhl4=Question 2
When might goods be quicksourced rather than outsourced?
65FRbtvWhl4=Question 3
Under what circumstances might outsourcing have an advantage over quicksourcing?
65FRbtvWhl4=Question 4
What could possibly cause a change towards outsourcing from quicksourcing?
65FRbtvWhl4=