In a diagram similar to Figure 5-2, determine the impact of the decrease in the workforce on the output of each industry and the equilibrium wage.
What happens to the rentals on capital and land?
How would your answer to Problem 1 change if instead we use the long-run model, with shoes and computers produced using labor and capital?
Consider an increase in the supply of labor due to immigration, and use the long-run model. Figure 5-8 shows the box diagram and the left-ward shift of the origin for the shoe industry. Redraw this diagram but instead shift to the right the origin for computers. That is, expand the labor axis by the amount ΔL but shift it to the right rather than to the left. With the new diagram, show how the amount of labor and capital in shoes and computers is determined, without any change in factor prices. Carefully explain what has happened to the amount of labor and capital used in each industry and to the output of each industry.
Redraw panel (a) of Figure 5-11 starting from the initial equilibrium at point A.
What is the effect of this change in land on the quantity of labor in each industry and on the equilibrium wage?
What is the effect on the rental on land and the rental on capital?
Now suppose that the international community wants to help the country struck by the natural disaster and decides to do so by increasing its level of FDI. So the rest of the world increases its investment in physical capital in the stricken country. Illustrate the effect of this policy on the equilibrium wage and rentals.
According to part A of Table 5-1, what education level loses most (i.e., has the greatest decrease in wage) from immigration to the United States? Does this result depend on keeping the rental on capital constant? Explain why or why not.
Solve for the amount of labor and capital used in each industry.
Hint: The box diagram shown in Figure 5-7 means that the amount of labor and capital used in each industry must add up to the total for the economy, so that
KC + KS = 100 and LC + LS = 100
Use the facts that KC = 2 · LC and KS = 0.5 · LS to rewrite these equations as
2 · LC + 0.5 · LS = 100 and LC + LS = 100
Use these two equations to solve for LC and LS, and then calculate the amount of capital used in each industry using KC = 2 · LC and KS = 0.5 · LS.
Suppose that the number of workers increases to 125 due to immigration, keeping total capital fixed at 100. Again, solve for the amount of labor and capital used in each industry. Hint: Redo the calculations from part (a), but using LC + LS = 125.
Suppose instead that the amount of capital increases to 125 due to FDI, keeping the total number of workers fixed at 100. Again solve for the amount of labor and capital used in each industry. Hint: Redo the calculations from part (a), using KC + KS = 125.
Explain how your results in parts (b) and (c) are related to the Rybczynski theorem.
Questions 7 and 8 explore the implications of the Rybczynski theorem and the factor price insensitivity result for the Heckscher-Ohlin model from Chapter 4.
Start at the no-trade equilibrium point A on the Home PPF in Figure 4-2, panel (a). Suppose that through immigration, the amount of labor in Home grows. Draw the new PPF, and label the point B where production would occur with the same prices for goods. Hint: You can refer to Figure 5-9 to see the effect of immigration on the PPF.
Suppose that the only difference between Foreign and Home is that Foreign has more labor. Otherwise, the technologies used to produce each good are the same across countries. Then how does the Foreign PPF compare with the new Home PPF (including immigration) that you drew in part (a)? Is point B the no-trade equilibrium in Foreign? Explain why or why not.
Illustrate a new point A* that is the no-trade equilibrium in Foreign. How do the relative no-trade prices of computers compare in Home and Foreign? Therefore, what will be the pattern of trade between the countries, and why?
Illustrate the international trade equilibrium on the Home and Foreign production possibilities frontiers. Hint: You can refer to Figure 4-3 to see the international trade equilibrium.
Suppose that the only difference between Foreign and Home is that Foreign has more labor. Otherwise, the technologies used to produce each good are the same across countries. Then, according to the factor price insensitivity result, how will the wage and rental compare in the two countries?
Call the result in part (b) “factor price equalization.” Is this a realistic result? Hint: You can refer to Figure 4-9 to see wages across countries.
Based on our extension of the Heckscher-Ohlin model at the end of Chapter 4, what is one reason why the factor price equalization result does not hold in reality?
Recall the formula from the application “The Effect of FDI on Rentals and Wages in Singapore.” Give an intuitive explanation for this formula for the rental rate. Hint: Describe one side of the equation as a marginal benefit and the other as a marginal cost.
For a capital-rich country like Singapore, the share of capital in GDP is about one-half and the share of labor is also one-half. Using these shares, calculate the average of the growth in the real rental and real wage shown in each row of Table 5-2. How do your answers compare with the productivity growth shown in the last column of Table 5-2?
For an industrialized country like the United States, the share of capital in GDP is about one-third and the share of labor in GDP is about two-thirds. Using these shares, calculate the average of the growth in the real rental and real wage shown in each row of Table 5-2. How do your answers now compare with the productivity growth shown in the last column?
Are there gains that accrue to the Home country? If so, redraw the graph and identify the magnitude of the gains for each country. If not, say why not.
Are there gains that accrue to the Foreign country? If so, again show the magnitude of these gains in the diagram and also show the world gains.
What can we say about the productivity of housekeepers in Singapore versus the Philippines? Explain.
What is the total gain to the housekeeper from migrating?
Is there a corresponding gain for the employer in Singapore? Explain.