Some American companies have found it advantageous to take activities they had previously shifted overseas and move them back home, in what is called “onshoring.”
Caterpillar, Inc. is considering relocating some heavy-
After a decade of rapid globalization, economists say companies are seeing disadvantages of offshore production, including shipping costs, complicated logistics, and quality issues. Political unrest and theft of intellectual property pose additional risks. “If you want to keep your supply chain tight, it’s hard to do that with a 16-
General Electric Co. said last June it would move production of some water heaters from China to its facility in Louisville, Kentucky, starting in 2011. A GE spokeswoman said a 2005 labor agreement under which new employees would be paid $13 an hour, [instead of the] nearly $20 an hour [they once made], “enabled us to be more competitive.”
Source: Kris Maher and Bob Tita, “Caterpillar Joins ‘Onshoring’ Trend,” The Wall Street Journal, March 11, 2010, p. A17. Reprinted with permission of The Wall Street Journal, Copyright © (2010) Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide
Questions to Consider
After reading Caterpillar Joins "Onshoring" Trend, consider the question(s) below. Then “submit” your response.
1. Given shipping costs are cited as a reason for Caterpillar’s “onshoring”, what other companies or industries would you expect to also be considering “onshoring”?
2. What will be the likely impact of “onshoring” on the countries with which Caterpillar previously sourced their manufacturing (e.g., China)?