How is a customs union different from a free-trade area? Provide examples of each.
Why do some economists prefer multilateral trade agreements over regional trade agreements?
Redraw the payoff matrix for a game between a large and small country.
What is/are the Nash equilibrium/equilibria, assuming that the large country applies an optimal tariff?
What does your answer to (b) tell you about the role of the WTO in a situation like this?
Fill in the values for W, X, Y, and Z.
Suppose that before NAFTA, the United States had a 20% tariff on imported semiconductors. Which country supplied the U.S. market? Is it the lowest-cost producer?
After NAFTA, who supplies the U.S. market? Has either trade creation or diversion occurred because of NAFTA? Explain.
Now suppose that before NAFTA, the United States had a 10% tariff on imported semiconductors. Then repeat parts (b) and (c).
In addition to the assumptions made in (d), consider the effect of an increase in high-technology investment in Canada due to NAFTA, allowing Canadian firms to develop better technology. As a result, three years after the initiation of NAFTA, Canadian firms can begin to sell their products to the United States for $46. What happens to the U.S. trade pattern three years after NAFTA? Has either trade creation or diversion occurred because of NAFTA? Explain.
Before the China–ASEAN free-trade area, how much does China import from each trading partner? What is the import price? Calculate the tariff revenue.
After the China–ASEAN free-trade area, how much does China import from each trade partner? What is the import price? What is the total tariff revenue of China?
Based on your answer to part (b), what is the impact of the China–ASEAN free-trade area on the welfare of China?
What is the effect of the China–ASEAN free-trade area on the welfare of Thailand and India?
As mentioned in the Headlines: China-ASEAN Treaty Threatens Indian Exporters, the China–ASEAN agreement may lead to a similar one between China and India. How would this affect China’s imports from each country? What would be the effect on welfare in China, Thailand, and India if such an agreement was signed?
When the United States and Mexico join NAFTA, who supplies auto parts to the United States? Does the United States import a larger quantity of auto parts after NAFTA; that is, does trade creation occur?
What is the change in government revenue compared with before NAFTA?
Is the United States better off for joining NAFTA?
Fill in the survey questions for yourself and at least five friends.
Average your results, and compare them with those in Table 11-2. Are there any consistent differences in the answers from your friends and those in Table 11-2?
Do the answers from your friends show the following two characteristics?
i. Many people are willing to pay at least a small amount to ensure good labor standards (or simply switch to an alternative with the same price), though relatively few are willing to pay a lot.
ii. Individuals had to receive a higher discount to purchase a T-shirt made under poor conditions than they were willing to pay for a T-shirt made under good conditions.
Explain whether these characteristics apply to your friends or not.
Using Table 11-3, explain why environmentalists have “lost the battle but won the war” in their dealings with the WTO. Refer to specific WTO cases in your answer.
Redraw Figure 11-4, panel (a), assuming that the production externality is positive so that the SMC curve lies below the supply curve. Label the area c that reflects the change in the cost of the externality when trade is opened. Is this area an additional social gain from free trade or an offsetting cost?
Can you think of a real-world example of this case?
Redraw Figure 11-4, panel (b), assuming that the consumption externality is positive so that the SMB curve lies above the demand curve. Label the area d that arises when trade is opened, and explain why this area is an additional social gain from free trade. (You can refer to the discussion of solar panels earlier in the chapter.)
First, consider the case of global pollution in which the government puts more weight on producer profits than consumer well-being when calculating welfare (this is so since a portion of consumer costs are borne by the other country). How can you tell that the government favors producers over consumers from the following payoff matrix? What is the Nash equilibrium for this environmental game? Is it a prisoner’s dilemma? Briefly explain.
Next, consider the case of local pollution in which the government puts more weight on consumer well-being than producer profits when calculating welfare. How can you tell that the government favors consumers over producers from the following payoff matrix? What is the Nash equilibrium for this environmental game? Is it a prisoner’s dilemma? Briefly explain.
In 2007, several members of Congress in the United States proposed that any further trade negotiations be accompanied by a “grand bargain” on labor standards. The problem with this action is that the current labor practices of the United States sometimes run afoul of the guidelines of the International Labour Organization (ILO), which would open up the United States to criticism and potentially sanctions from that agency. The article “Why a ‘Grand Deal’ on Labor Could End Trade Talks” describes these concerns and argues that such a “grand deal” would be a mistake for the United States. A full-text version of this article is available at http://www.iie.com/publications/opeds/oped.cfm?ResearchID=716.
Answer the following: Do you agree or disagree with the proposal for the United States to pursue a “grand deal” on labor standards, bringing its own laws into line with those of the International Labour Organization?
In March 2007 it was announced that several restaurants in the greater San Francisco area would no longer provide bottled water to their patrons to save on the environmental costs of transporting that water: do an Internet search for the phrase “bottled water backlash” to find articles about the San Francisco restaurants and other companies taking this action. Instead, these companies would install filtering equipment that would allow them to serve local water. Although these actions are intended to be more environmentally friendly, they will affect firms and countries that sell bottled water. One of these countries is Fiji, which obtains a major portion of its export earnings from bottled water.
Answer the following: Do you agree or disagree with the actions taken by the restaurants in San Francisco?