Chapter 1: HEADLINES: Sum of iPhone Parts: Trade Distortion

image
©STANCA SANDA/Alamy
Products like the Apple iPhone are often assembled in China from components made in many other countries.

See the full-size image.

Although the iPhone sold in the United States is assembled in China, most of its value comes from parts made in other countries. Counting its full value as a U.S. import from China therefore exaggerates the size of the U.S. trade deficit with China.

One widely touted solution for current U.S. economic woes is for America to come up with more of the high-tech gadgets that the rest of the world craves. Yet two academic researchers have found that Apple Inc.’s iPhone—one of the most iconic U.S. technology products—actually added $19 billion to the U.S. trade deficit with China last year. How is this possible?

… Though the iPhone is entirely designed and owned by a U.S. company, and is made largely of parts produced in other countries, it is physically assembled in China. Both countries’ trade statistics therefore consider the iPhone a Chinese export to the U.S. So a U.S. consumer who buys what is often considered an American product will add to the U.S. trade deficit with China. The result is that according to official statistics, “even high-tech products invented by U.S. companies will not increase U.S. exports,” …. This isn’t a problem with high-tech products, but with how exports and imports are measured …

The new research adds to a growing technical debate about traditional trade statistics that could have big real-world consequences. Conventional trade figures are the basis for political battles waging in Washington and Brussels over what to do about China’s currency policies and its allegedly unfair trading practices. But there is a growing belief that the practice of assuming every product shipped from one country is entirely produced by that country may need to be adjusted. “What we call ‘Made in China’ is indeed assembled in China, but what makes up the commercial value of the product comes from the numerous countries that preceded its assembly in China in the global value chain,” Pascal Lamy, the director-general of the World Trade Organization, said in a speech in October. “The concept of country of origin for manufactured goods has gradually become obsolete.” Mr. Lamy said that if trade statistics were adjusted to reflect the actual value contributed to a product by different countries, the size of the U.S. trade deficit with China—$226.88 billion, according to U.S. figures—would be cut in half. That means, he argued, that political tensions over trade deficits are probably larger than they should be.

Questions to Consider

After reading Sum of iPhone Parts: Trade Distortion, consider the question(s) below. Then “submit” your response.

Question

IiRkLm2nocQ1E0BTnsBcAfz8s1VM4flOOCd75wOx4bPEviwg0Od7cEzzC8e/aRT7SwS2xff0k6tTInFdZFxSx2cV+tH8XruP0qXNQy0v7AA9u2PfLLjugIESI8RxO89R19KSB9WhzeH647NBCZRYU6ZLhmvzR7LuWSFhxeGeXBZLmVgurfNsYjiuCFsGQbpqDOR9346Ce6emjJQQXNT5iPIDcXOEEl8bffEeD/cAqYNqmlPxEvK5XabT06l43Ea7awwXrZoJhmRNkIMPlYPjzSmMifyB3ZFKJejFNcT5gTWw5xTOuhayRtLwrh8bXV2vcfcNwPaK1qfQ/Wbe3uIoow==
From a trade accounting perspective, the current method substantially overestimates the size of the U.S. trade deficit with China. There are a variety of other reasons the current accounting system might raise concerns for Americans, so answers may vary.

Question

sFJRZ5z0nAA4x/oj4jM8QvaRbj6c9TfdOLGkC+gPDdgs2Uo0eHYXvRqScvvWcjxi+EiXFGjS+KU3h5E+7jJD66GWjZmHwkDyw5AaZFY7BDJOOLCURD2rFsZ9dsHeTTERkmu99OaCmZzXHisFMjCJGS6kO2oTUHTsWAmmJ6uDAytrJf1PndSOFho1YjG11P2xrumPgJqyHzlMYA0+oLopK7VKqdaBoBEFHWLst6yUWjGRS0ZA
Answers will vary, but the article states that political tensions between the U.S. and China over the trade deficit are probably overstated. By failing to account for China’s import of the iPod’s design, its net exports and therefore its GDP are inflated.

Question

9HJuDPYXb3fd9gzHPTtJb52i3jpNHz6hUeJFqhvlADOaeB6tP6uLuAQ/qQ4OsoAHfkUfqx+OXmhz3jB8n4UsrxmwKD0TrlmFAT/kmGWgziHlu7IG+hpd1Dk/hYs1x0pgCNsxenURsr5zdhlfqYal3v7bZnQvuu2WTqtuWixT5q+DFMZjuDjjQnHfN10+jkP+goTDJqQOFfGQfnv/
Yes, any country that produces the design/blueprint for an intermediate good or part would be affected.

Question

qsIzLo9lBrQGPJVMHzAndMFGqZppFG5vZS89zvFovp9PEtkHPxeshgLRi14D8NlDjq/Y20tw5sWkIxwtJI+dnVbMLSCm+IAQZO6fuSgq04/1vC/avKM3B/Ihun8A28oZAw+ErQ645jQIdaXt9b/59y7xtsbibSc1RuZ/SlmD++n+z2Nfmlog4t5c1IjiX6U2A+fBQZYm8MP/EYeBEWc4etusB8pWYOgFxbZqrpCID+spLYLpbJthIGasHl4C5wocuJ/tSEP8CYBE4dAHjb6xPVFa9fidcERf1EpWROCr7sfvZNHmVPTeCLQ77iqTe7DcFnOGuIPIKdnG0enFpVB+TnIz0vVJK1n6oN/s0lEDz+UzUkrvZiAO3drHTYeXVmd9Us2o/w8B7Mw5kOwChFCl7ZHJzVvgPYkvYnHVk4laoZGDCthuxmgIOg==
Answers will vary. An example answer may say: such an undertaking would be too expensive and cumbersome to implement. It would involve estimating the percentage of the value of the good that is exported that is accounted for by such things as research and development and design.