1 K. Parker, A. Lenhart, and K. Moore, The Digital Revolution and Higher Education: College Presidents, Public Differ on Value of Online Learning (Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, August 28, 2011), 1.

2 P. Moore, “Productivity by Camera,” NZ Business, July 2011, 43.

3 J. Eberbach, “Detroit City Council to Skype Public Meetings,” 21c3 (blog), Michigan Municipal League, March 10, 2011, http://www.mml.org/resources/21c3/post/2011/03/10/Detroit-City-Council-to-Skype-Public-Meetings.aspx.

4 J. M. Denstadli, T. E. Julsrud, and R. J. Hjorthol, “Videoconferencing as a Mode of Communication: A Comparative Study of the Use of Videoconferencing and Face-to-Face Meetings, Journal of Business and Technical Communication 26, no. 1 (2012): 71.

5 Ibid., 84–85.

6 R. van der Kleij, R. M. Paashuis, and J. M. Schraagen, “On the Passage of Time: Temporal Differences in Video-Mediated and Face-to-Face Interaction, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62, no. 4 (2005): 528.

7 Ibid., 539.

8 N. Kock, “Information Systems Theorizing Based on Evolutionary Psychology: An Interdisciplinary Review and Theory Integration Framework,” MIS Quarterly 33, no. 2 (2009): 406–7.

9 ———, “Media Richness or Media Naturalness? The Evolution of Our Biological Communication Apparatus and Its Influence on Our Behavior toward E-Communication Tools, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 48, no. 2 (2005): 121.

10 Kock, “Information Systems,” 407.

11 J. K. Burgoon and others, “Testing the Interactivity Principle: Effects of Mediation, Propinquity, and Verbal and Nonverbal Modalities in Interpersonal Interaction,” Journal of Communication 52, no. 3 (2002): 662.

12 A. Lyons, S. Reysen, and L. Pierce, “Video Lecture Format, Student Technological Efficacy, and Social Presence in Online Courses,” Computers in Human Behavior 28, no. 1 (2012): 182.

13 Burgoon and others, “Testing the Interactivity Principle,” 662.

14 W. Turmel, Ten Steps to Successful Virtual Presentations (Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press, 2011), 8.

15 Z. Guo and others, “Improving the Effectiveness of Virtual Teams: A Comparison of Video-Conferencing and Face-to-Face Communication in China,” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 52, no. 1 (2009): 1–16.

16 Kock, “Media Richness,” 121.

17 Denstadli, Julsrud, and Hjorthol, “Videoconferencing as a Mode,” 66.

18 Van der Kleij, Paashuis, and Schraagen, “On the Passage of Time,” 523.

19 J. Gendelman, Virtual Presentations That Work (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2010), 35–36.

20 R. F. Adler and R. Benbunan-Fich, “Juggling on a High Wire: Multitasking Effects on Performance,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70, no. 2 (2012): 156.

21 Turmel, Ten Steps, 8.

22 Ibid., 125–26.

23 R. McCammon, “Is There Proper Etiquette for Videoconferencing?” Entrepreneur, November 2011, 22.

24 T. J. Koegel, The Exceptional Presenter Goes Virtual (Austin: Greenleaf Book Group Press, 2010), 98.

25 Guo and others, “Improving the Effectiveness,” 3.

26 C. A. Noble, “From China’s Great Wall to Hollywood’s Great Spy: The Story of Military Smokes and Obscurants,” in Aerosol Science and Technology: History and Reviews, ed. D. S. Ensor, 377–88 (Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International, 2011), 377.

27 Turmel, Ten Steps, 8.

28 S. Stockman, How to Shoot Video That Doesn’t Suck (New York: Workman, 2011), 92.

29 Turmel, Ten Steps, 93.

30 Stockman, How to Shoot Video, 12–13, 120.

31 Gendelman, Virtual Presentations That Work, 66.

32 McCammon, “Is There Proper Etiquette for Videoconferencing?” 20.

33 Turmel, Ten Steps, 93.

34 Koegel, The Exceptional Presenter, 114.

35 Stockman, How to Shoot Video, 41.

36 Ibid., 150.