Interpret the Evidence and Put It in Context

Document Links:

Document 12.1 ABRAHAM LINCOLN, On Slavery (1854)

Document 12.2 Republican Party Platform (1856)

Document 12.3 CHARLES SUMNER, The Crime against Kansas (1856)

Document 12.4 LYDIA MARIA CHILD, Letters to Mrs. S. B. Shaw and Miss Lucy Osgood (1856)

Document 12.5 The Lincoln-Douglas Debates (1858)

INTERPRET THE EVIDENCE

  1. According to Abraham Lincoln, what are the benefits of a free-labor system over a system of slavery (Document 12.1)? How does Lincoln use his own life story as evidence?

  2. How did the Republican Party platform of 1856 address the issue of Kansas statehood (Document 12.2)? Why do you think it also included resolutions regarding internal improvements?

  3. What are Charles Sumner’s criticisms of Andrew Butler and of the institution of slavery (Document 12.3)? How does he defend himself from claims that he is the fanatical head of a sectional party?

  4. How did “Bleeding Kansas” and the beating of Charles Sumner influence the politics of Lydia Maria Child (Document 12.4)? What kind of abolitionism did Child endorse? What roles did she believe women should play in politics?

  5. What are Lincoln’s arguments regarding the future of slavery and the fugitive slave law (Document 12.5)? Does he call for abolition? How does Stephen Douglas attempt to characterize Lincoln? Why does he seek to tie Lincoln to Frederick Douglass and issues of racial equality?

PUT IT IN CONTEXT

  1. According to the individuals featured in these documents, who is responsible for ending slavery? What role do they envision the Republican Party playing in ending the peculiar institution? How do these documents show how abolitionism had evolved over time?

  2. In what ways do these prominent Republicans call for an end to slavery without necessarily calling for black equality? How have they expanded the Free-Soil Party platform to appeal to a wider constituency?