The experiment described below explored the same concepts as the one described in Figure 23.20 in the textbook. Read the description of the experiment and answer the questions below the description to practice interpreting data and understanding experimental design.
Mirror Experiment activities practice skills described in the brief Experiment and Data Analysis Primers, which can be found by clicking on the “Resources” button on the upper right of your LaunchPad homepage. Certain questions in this activity draw on concepts described in the Data and Data Presentation primer. Click on the “Key Terms” buttons to see definitions of terms used in the question, and click on the “Primer Section” button to pull up a relevant section from the primer.
Background
The text presented here is the introductory text. Replace with the following: “Most fish have symmetrical craniofacial features, where eyes are located on both sides of the body. However, flatfishes – a group of fish that lie on the seafloor and ambush prey - have distinctly asymmetrical features; in these fish, both eyes are located on one side of the body. Fossil evidence has demonstrated an intermediate between fish and tetrapods, called Tiktaalik. Does the fossil record also contain an intermediate between asymmetrical and symmetrical fish? Did asymmetrical fish actually evolve from symmetrical fish?”
Hypothesis
Much like Tiktaalik bridges the gap between fish and tetrapods (recall Fig. 23.20), researchers hypothesized that a fossil link exists between asymmetrical and symmetrical fish - one that records the migration of an eye orbital from one side of the head to the other.
Observation
Fish fossils from two groups – Heteronectes and Amphistium – demonstrate asymmetrical facial features; however, these features are not as pronounced as those observed in modern-day flatfishes, where both eye orbitals are located on one side of the head. In Heteronectes and Amphistium fossils, the orbital of one eye is typically located further up the side of the head (closer to the middle of the back of the fish). This orbital actually appears to be “migrating” from one side to the other (i.e. from right to left) in sequential fossil specimens. In other words, if fossils of asymmetrical fish and their ancestors were arranged from oldest to most recent (according to the time period from which they originated), the older fossils would have two orbitals – one on either side of the head – in roughly the same position (similar to the arrangement of Trachinotus depicted in Figure 1). More recent fossils would have a single orbital located in the “normal” position (i.e. in the middle of the right or left side of the head), and an intermediate position for the remaining orbital, one located further up the opposite side of the skull (as in Heteronectes and Amphistium in Figure 1).
Source
Friedman, M., 2008. The evolutionary origin of flatfish asymmetry. Nature. 454, 209-12.
Qualitative data | Descriptive data. |
Quantitative datal | Numerical data. |
Discrete dada | Data that are counted and can take only certain values. |
Continuous data | Data that are measured and can take any value. |
Data and Data Presentation
Kinds of Data
Data come in several fundamentally different forms:
Qualitative data are descriptive; quantitative data are expressed numerically. Discrete data are counted and can only take certain values; continuous data are measured and can take any value. In general in science, we are dealing with quantitative data because they lead to more and more powerful methods of analysis. In particular, quantitative data lend themselves to statistical analysis. With the quantitative data gathered on the height of our corn stems, for example, we can calculate the average height of all the stems in the field. Data that may appear superficially qualitative is accordingly often transformed into quantitative data. To take a familiar example, in surveys you may be given a statement and asked whether you “Strongly Agree, Agree, Disagree, or Strongly Disagree.” These are qualitative assessments, but they are converted into quantitative data by giving each category a numerical score: Strongly Agree = 4, Agree = 3, Disagree = 2, Strongly Disagree = 1. With these numerical scores, we can summarize the results of the survey statistically. For example, we can compare our survey’s average with the averages from similar surveys carried out over different years or in different countries to see if responses vary by time and place.
Given the morphological characteristics present in fish of the Trachinotus,
Amphistium and Heteronectes, and Citharus groups, which phylogenetic
tree best represents the relationship between these organisms?