Liam and Brynn are on a vacation in Las Vegas. Their approaches to gambling are quite different. Liam tends to engage in risk-aversion, whereas Brynn leans more toward risk-seeking. While playing slot machines, Liam hits a jackpot worth $1,100. He can either cash out or bet it all for a chance to win $2,200. The odds are 1 in 7 that he will win the bigger jackpot. According to Kahneman and Tversky’s prospect theory, how will Liam likely respond? How would Brynn respond if confronted with the same decision?
Liam and Brynn are on a vacation in Las Vegas. Their approaches to gambling are quite different. Liam tends to engage in risk-aversion, whereas Brynn leans more toward risk-seeking. While playing slot machines, Liam hits a jackpot worth $1,100. He can either cash out or bet it all for a chance to win $2,200. The odds are 1 in 7 that he will win the bigger jackpot. According to Kahneman and Tversky’s prospect theory, how will Liam likely respond? How would Brynn respond if confronted with the same decision?
Because Liam tends to engage in risk-aversion, he is likely to choose the certain $1,100 jackpot rather than risk losing everything (i.e., the uncertain $2,200 jackpot). Brynn, on the other hand, will most likely select the risky alternative. She will risk losing the $1,100 in order to possibly double her winnings.