The factor that is observed and measured for change in an experiment, thought to be influenced by the independent variable; also called the outcome variable.
double-blind
An experimental control in which neither the participants nor the researchers interacting with the participants are aware of the group or condition to which the participants have been assigned.
independent variable
The purposely manipulated factor thought to produce change in an experiment; also called the treatment variable.
operational definition
A precise description of how the variables in a study will be manipulated or measured.
placebo
A fake substance, treatment, or procedure that has no known direct effects.
placebo effect
Any change attributed to a person’s beliefs and expectations rather than an
actual drug, treatment, or procedure.
random assignment
The process of assigning participants to experimental conditions so that all participants have an equal chance of being assigned to any of the conditions or groups in the study.
Think Like a Scientist
Ketamine
By:
Susan A. Nolan, Seton Hall University
Sandra E. Hockenbury
REFERENCES
aan het Rot, Marije; Collins, Katherine A.; Murrough, James W.; Perez, Andrew M.; Reich, David L.; Charney, Dennis S.; & Mathew, Sanjay J. (2010). Safety and efficacy of repeated-dose intravenous ketamine for treatment-resistant depression. Biological Psychiatry, 67, 139–145.
Larkin, Gregory L., & Beautrais, Annette L. (2011). A preliminary naturalistic study of low-dose ketamine for depression and suicide ideation in the emergency department. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 14, 1127–1131.
Hamilton, Jon. (2012, January 31). 'I wanted to live': New depression drugs offer hope for toughest cases. Morning Edition, National Public Radio. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/01/31/146096540/i-wanted-to-live-new-depression-drugs-offer-hope-for-toughest-cases
Pollack, Andrew. (2014, December 9). Special K, a hallucinogen, raises hopes and concerns as a treatment for depression. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/10/business/special-k-a-hallucinogen-raises-hopes-and-concerns-as-a-treatment-for-depression.html
Stix, Gary. (2013, September 12). Is ketamine right for you? Off-label prescriptions for depression pick up in small clinics, part 2. Retrieved from http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/talking-back/2013/09/12/is-ketamine-right-for-you-off-label-ketamine-prescriptions-for-depression-pick-up-in-small-clinics-part-2/
Zarate, Carlos A.; Singh, Jaskaran B.; Carlson, Paul J.; Brutsche, Nancy E.; Ameli, Rezvan; Luckenbaugh, David A.; ... & Manji, Husseini K. (2006). A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 856–864.
FAQ
What is Think Like a Scientist? Think Like a Scientist is a digital activity designed to help you develop your scientific thinking skills. Each activity places you in a different, real-world scenario, asking you to think critically about a specific claim.
Can instructors track your progress inThink Like a Scientist? Scores from the five-question assessments at the end of each activity can be reported to your instructor. To ensure your privacy while participating in non-assessment features, which can include pseudoscientific quizzes or games, no other student response is saved or reported.
How is Think Like a Scientist aligned with the APA Guidelines 2.0? The American Psychological Association’s “Guidelines for the Undergraduate Psychology Major” provides a set of learning goals for students. Think Like a Scientist addresses several of these goals, although it is specifically designed to develop skills from APA Goal 2: Scientific Inquiry and Critical Thinking. “Ketamine” covers many outcomes, including:
Interpret, design, and conduct basic psychological research: Define and explain the purpose of key research concepts that characterize psychological research [identify independent and dependent variables in a study]
Use scientific reasoning to interpret psychological phenomena: Ask relevant questions to gather more information about behavioral claims [consider how to conduct a better double-blind experiment]
15.2Introduction
This activity invites you to test the claim that ketamine, sometimes sold illegally as the street drug "Special K," is a promising treatment for depression. First, you’ll hear three audio clips from a radio show that interviewed a patient who benefited from ketamine and a scientist who studies ketamine. You will then examine the current evidence about the effectiveness of ketamine as a treatment for depression, and consider alternative explanations for these findings. Finally, you will evaluate sources for information about how well ketamine works as an antidepressant.
15.3Identify the Claim
1
Identify the Claim
15.3.1Can a Street Drug Treat Depression?
Can a street drug treat depression? In the chapter on therapies, you learned about a promising new treatment for depression, an experimental drug called ketamine (Larkin & Beautrais, 2011). Ketamine is used legally as an anesthetic, but it is better known as the illegal party drug Special K. More recently, people suffering from depression have been treated with lower doses of the drug with surprisingly successful results. For many people, ketamine reduces symptoms of depression very quickly, but its use is controversial (Zarate & others, 2006).
Scott Houston/Sygma/Corbis
15.3.2The Controversy Surrounding Ketamine
Let’s explore the controversy surrounding ketamine. We’ll start by playing you audio clips from a news show on National Public Radio. First, you’ll hear from Christopher Stephens (pictured below), a 28-year-old special-education assistant and martial arts instructor who lives in northern California. Stephens tells reporter Jon Hamilton that he had tried about ten different antidepressants or anti-anxiety drugs; many had negative side effects and none reduced his depression. In fact, his depression became so deep, Stephens started considering suicide. Let’s listen.
hockenbury_tls_ch15_audio_control
Lianne Milton/Panos Pictures
15.3.3The Claim About Ketamine
As you learned in the chapter on therapies, many antidepressants affect serotonin and some affect both serotonin and norepinephrine. But Dr. Zarate, the brain scientist to whom Stephens was referred, has a different idea. Let’s hear again from reporter John Hamilton talking about Dr. Zarate.
Correct! 12 out of 17 participants improved within hours after a single dose of ketamine.
Actually, the answer is D. 12 out of 17 participants improved within hours after a single dose of ketamine.
15.4.2The Side Effects of Ketamine
In these early studies, ketamine relieved depression within hours for many people suffering from depression. Unfortunately, ketamine can have serious side effects. For example, the table below lists side effects reported in one study of ketamine as an antidepressant (aan het Rot & others, 2010). We pick up the audio clip with Dr. Zarate again.
hockenbury_tls_ch15_audio_control_4
15.4.3Ketamine: An Experiment
Let’s look at one of the ketamine experiments. Dr. Zarate led a study of 18 patients who were diagnosed with major depression and had been treated unsuccessfully with antidepressants at least twice (Zarate & others, 2006). Through random assignment, Dr. Zarate placed these 18 patients in one of two groups—9 received ketamine and 9 received a placebo. The study was double-blind; neither the patients nor their doctors knew which they had received.
Following treatment, the researchers measured patients’ levels of depression. The researchers’ operational definition of depression was the patients’ scores on a standardized test of depression symptoms.
Correct! In this experiment, the dependent variable was the score on the standardized test of depression symptoms.
Actually, the answer is D. In this experiment, the dependent variable was the score on the standardized test of depression symptoms.
15.4.4Ketamine Versus Placebo
Dr. Zarate’s study found “dramatic” results (Zarate & others, 2006). Less than two hours after treatment, patients who received ketamine were significantly less depressed, on average, than those who received placebo. More than a third of the ketamine patients maintained this improvement, compared with the placebo group, for a week or longer. You can see Zarate’s results in the graph here. The shaded portion indicates where the two groups were significantly different. Remember, this is based on just one dose of ketamine. This study does indeed support the effectiveness of ketamine as an antidepressant, at least in the short term. And a short-term success might give patients a chance to get a longer-term treatment started with antidepressants that can take weeks to begin working.
Correct! Ketamine outperformed after 110 minutes, after 1 day, and after 7 days.
Actually, the answer is D. Ketamine outperformed after 110 minutes, after 1 day, and after 7 days.
15.5Consider Alternative Explanations
3
Consider Alternative Explanations
15.5.1Ketamine Effect or Placebo Effect?
Is ketamine really a fast-acting antidepressant? Or is there another explanation? Maybe it’s a placebo effect—and we don’t mean the actual placebo. We’ll explain. People who take ketamine almost certainly feel its effects. And the researchers used a saline solution as the placebo, which would not have a noticeable effect. So, Dr. Zarate’s study may not have been truly “double-blind”: both the participants and the clinicians probably realized exactly who received ketamine or a placebo, which may have affected each participant’s response.
Other researchers suggest using “an active control,” a substance with noticeable effects. They could use, for example, a substance similar to ketamine, such as another anesthetic, that doesn’t affect the glutamate system (aan het Rot & others, 2010). This would make it more difficult for the participants and researchers to know who was in the ketamine condition or in the control condition.
Correct! Using another substance with noticeable effects would make for a better double-blind experiment than using a saline solution, which has very little effect.
Actually, the answer is D. Using another substance with noticeable effects would make for a better double-blind experiment than using a saline solution, which has very little effect.
15.6Consider the Source of the Research or Claim
4
Consider the Source of the Research or Claim
15.6.1Should Ketamine Be Used as an Antidepressant?
Ketamine has received a lot of press for its potential as a fast-acting antidepressant. And research does seem to support its effectiveness, at least as a short-term solution. The problem is that ketamine is not approved for use as an antidepressant by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and is still considered experimental as a treatment for depression. In fact, in discussing the current lack of sufficient evidence for FDA approval, one reporter points out that most of the evidence for ketamine as a treatment for depression is based largely on “testimonial and anecdote” (Stix, 2013).
Ketamine is legitimately prescribed as an anesthetic, though, so physicians may legally prescribe it “off label” to people suffering from depression. This allows pop-up clinics to offer off-label ketamine prescriptions at hundreds of dollars a dose, which are usually not covered by insurance (Pollack, 2014).
Catherine Yeulet/Getty Images
15.6.2Misleading Information about Ketamine as an Antidepressant
Pop-up clinics offering off-label ketamine to treat depression have become a lucrative business, and advertising encourages the use of ketamine for this purpose. Just look at the mock ad below, which is based on real ads for ketamine clinics. Ads like this often provide vague or misleading information about ketamine. Read each of the four statements in the bullet list of the mock ad below, and then read the text in the accompanying bubbles to learn how each of these statements is potentially problematic.
15.6.3Consider the Conflicts of Interest, Plus a Warning
In the mock ad you just saw, you read about several ways in which important information was not provided to the patient. The bottom line is that the people who run the clinic may have conflicts of interest. Those who run the clinics may be motivated by the desire to help patients, or they may be motivated by the desire to make money. In the meantime, research continues, and one day ketamine or a new drug aimed at the glutamate system may be scientifically vetted and widely available as a treatment for depression. In the meantime, if you or a loved one is diagnosed with depression, think like a scientist as you consider possible treatments.
Here’s one final word about using ketamine for treating depression: We do not endorse the off-label use of ketamine for treating depression. And the street drug version of ketamine can be downright dangerous. If you are suffering from depression, seek reputable mental and physical healthcare providers.
The correct answer is A. The FDA has approved ketamine only as an anesthetic. It has not been approved as an antidepressant or suicide-prevention treatment, and the FDA does not approve any substances for use as party drugs.
The correct answer is B. An experiment uses random assignment to place patients into treatment conditions, in this case either ketamine or placebo. Without random assignment, we cannot conclude that the independent variable—treatment—caused changes in the dependent variable—symptoms of depression.
The correct answer is C. Because ketamine often has obvious side effects, whereas placebo does not, both the patients and the clinicians may have realized who was taking ketamine. Any response might have been a placebo effect. That is, patients may have responded because they knew they were taking the active substance, ketamine.
The correct answer is B. The FDA has not yet approved ketamine for use as an antidepressant. There is not yet sufficient evidence that it is safe and effective as an antidepressant. In addition, few physicians working in these clinics have training in both anesthesiology and psychiatry. Finally, testimonials are typically hand-picked for their positive outcomes. Success stories are not evidence.