4. In Pursuit of Happiness

4.
In Pursuit of Happiness

Epicurus, Letter to a Friend (Late Third Century B.C.E.)

Born on the island of Samos, Epicurus (c. 341–270 B.C.E.) earned a reputation as an accomplished teacher in Asia Minor that eventually led him to Athens in 306. In the tradition of the schools of philosophy of Plato and Aristotle, the “Garden” of Epicurus attracted a strong following. Although the adjective epicurean has often been taken to mean the enjoyment of life’s pleasures, Epicurus’s actual philosophy was based on the pursuit of true, spiritual happiness. In his Letter to a Friend, Epicurus explores the meaning of happiness, and concludes that it is based on simple needs and a serene spirit.

From “Letter to Menoecius,” in The Way of Philosophy, trans. Philip Wheelwright (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc., 1960), 423–25.

We must consider that of desires some are natural, others empty; that of the natural some are necessary, others not; and that of the necessary some are necessary for happiness, others for bodily comfort, and others for life itself. A right understanding of these facts enables us to direct all choice and avoidance toward securing the health of the body and tranquillity of the soul; this being the final aim of a blessed life. For the aim of all actions is to avoid pain and fear; and when this is once secured for us the tempest of the soul is entirely quelled, since the living animal no longer needs to wander as though in search of something he lacks, hunting for that by which he can fulfill some need of soul or body. We feel a need of pleasure only when we grieve over its absence; when we stop grieving we are in need of pleasure no longer. Pleasure, then, is the beginning and end of the blessed life. For we recognize it as a good which is both primary and kindred to us. From pleasure we begin every act of choice and avoidance; and to pleasure we return again, using the feeling as the standard by which to judge every good.

Now since pleasure is the good that is primary and most natural to us, for that very reason we do not seize all pleasures indiscriminately; on the contrary we often pass over many pleasures, when greater discomfort accrues to us as a result of them. Similarly we not infrequently judge pains better than pleasures, when the long endurance of a pain yields us a greater pleasure in the end. Thus every pleasure because of its natural kinship to us is good, yet not every pleasure is to be chosen; just as every pain also is an evil, yet that does not mean that all pains are necessarily to be shunned. It is by a scale of comparison and by the consideration of advantages and disadvantages that we must form our judgment on these matters. On particular occasions we may have reason to treat the good as bad, and the bad as good.

Independence of circumstance we regard as a great good: not because we wish to dispense altogether with external advantages, but in order that, if our possessions are few, we may be content with what we have, sincerely believing that those enjoy luxury most who depend on it least, and that natural wants are easily satisfied if we are willing to forego superfluities. Plain fare yields as much pleasure as a luxurious table, provided the pain of real want is removed; bread and water can give exquisite delight to hungry and thirsty lips. To form the habit of a simple and modest diet, therefore, is the way to health: it enables us to perform the needful employments of life without shrinking, it puts us in better condition to enjoy luxuries when they are offered, and it renders us fearless of fortune.

Accordingly, when we argue that pleasure is the end and aim of life, we do not mean the pleasure of prodigals and sensualists, as some of our ignorant or prejudiced critics persist in mistaking us. We mean the pleasure of being free from pain of body and anxiety of mind. It is not a continual round of drunken debauches and lecherous delights, nor the enjoyment of fish and other delicacies of a wealthy table, which produce a pleasant life; but sober reasoning, searching out the motives of choice and avoidance, and escaping the bondage of opinion, to which the greatest disturbances of spirit are due.

The first step and the greatest good is prudence—a more precious thing than philosophy even, for all the other virtues are sprung from it. By prudence we learn that we can live pleasurably only if we live prudently, honorably, and justly, while contrariwise to live prudently, honorably, and justly guarantees a life that is pleasurable as well. The virtues are by nature bound up with a pleasant life, and a pleasant life is inseparable from them in turn.

Is there any better and wiser man than he who holds reverent beliefs about the gods, is altogether free from the fear of death, and has serenely contemplated the basic tendencies (telê) of natural law? Such a man understands that the limit of good things is easy to attain, and that evils are slight either in duration or in intensity. He laughs at Destiny, which so many accept as all-powerful. Some things, he observes, occur of necessity, others by chance, and still others through our own agency. Necessity is irresponsible, chance is inconstant, but our own actions are free, and it is to them that praise and blame are properly attached. It would be better even to believe the myths about the gods than to submit to the Destiny which the natural philosophers teach. For the old superstitions at least offer some faint hope of placating the gods by worship, but the Necessity of the scientific philosophers is absolutely unyielding. As to chance, the wise man does not deify it as most men do; for if it were divine it would not be without order. Nor will he accept the view that it is a universal cause even though of a wavering kind; for he believes that what chance bestows is not the good and evil that determine a man’s blessedness in life, but the starting-points from which each person can arrive at great good or great evil. He esteems the misfortune of the wise above the prosperity of a fool; holding it better that well chosen courses of action should fail than that ill chosen ones should succeed by mere chance.

Meditate on these and like precepts day and night, both privately and with some companion who is of kindred disposition. Thereby shall you never suffer disturbance, waking or asleep, but shall live like a god among men. For a man who lives constantly among immortal blessings is surely more than mortal.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

  1. According to Epicurus, what is the relationship between pleasure and pain? What is pleasure? Why might someone choose pain over pleasure?

    Question

    N1bhcUghcWsEkT2Z9hS840V6yGVPja8mrLg/NZW9Ws3EZR+gD/YdtY4PJTK0+apVvaK4E40HCT1Emt57nkzihV3QgaIWwQvMqzvDgor2cToJBp7BSHhgaeCyOUaL1HBBsFxW2px9MmBANXsXKN5Vc2xTGlyctTqRCz236cHrQjsUCWEXKzF4xaix3yL5l2yxLf5GUiHUG+EEQBeEmX25g+g2VGHO7FPYM0br/h1cRThagPdk
    According to Epicurus, what is the relationship between pleasure and pain? What is pleasure? Why might someone choose pain over pleasure?
  2. What guidelines should a human being follow in making life choices?

    Question

    o0JpU0A7z7F4KYDVn0+FaDsCs93YHnZAqxOG9w3HdxjPcXTp/Wkq1XK/a9guDBiWodGQL5Z6m9XbInDhha8ZbZK7ylK7ncaCWGICUoCco1xsCtmicCoInaHtsi1iyCtBSPhMLHJ/Y4PoPP/2OUkECw==
    What guidelines should a human being follow in making life choices?
  3. How could someone best reconcile the fact that destiny, or chance, is beyond his or her control?

    Question

    sHzWAVkgMW23hCNZIKY7tqLzK1QhklAU72+WF9WZ7HRlfiDYc82EVc8My8UTLw18u5jwoHj1yRUZKoMy1ceurayKTyy+fNHTlS/Kc0xTzsvBy0oIO3a8nBKi4zY0rkEM0aBXLA3BE7O18YAFE+je8A/CzTifxV9SxIYMTnoh2/tjHlc8XU+Jvhsx0M8=
    How could someone best reconcile the fact that destiny, or chance, is beyond his or her control?