3. New Influences to the North

3.
New Influences to the North

Tacitus, Germania (c. 98 C.E.)

The historian Tacitus (c. 56–120) was a shrewd observer and scathing critic of imperial rule, often contrasting the reportedly superior lives and morals of foreign peoples with those of Romans. Alongside his major historical writings, his works include a short treatise describing the Germanic peoples in the Rhineland. Drawing on earlier descriptions, he paints a compelling picture of the public and private life of the Germanic tribes, who at the time lived outside of Roman rule. Although Tacitus’s account was perhaps idealized because of his dissatisfaction with contemporary Roman society—in his view, the Roman emperor was too high-handed and Roman citizens too decadent—his description offers information about the early Germans found in no other contemporary literary source.

From The Agricola and Germany of Tacitus, trans. Alfred John Church and William Jackson Brodribb (London: Macmillan, 1885), 87–90, 92–101.

Germany and Its Tribes

The Inhabitants. Origin of the Name “Germany”

The Germans themselves I should regard as aboriginal, and not mixed at all with other races through immigration or intercourse. For, in former times, it was not by land but on shipboard that those who sought to emigrate would arrive; and the boundless and, so to speak, hostile ocean beyond us, is seldom entered by a sail from our world. And, beside the perils of rough and unknown seas, who would leave Asia, or Africa, or Italy for Germany, with its wild country, its inclement skies, its sullen manners and aspect, unless indeed it were his home? . . .

Physical Characteristics

For my own part, I agree with those who think that the tribes of Germany are free from all taint of intermarriages with foreign nations, and that they appear as a distinct, unmixed race, like none but themselves. Hence, too, the same physical peculiarities throughout so vast a population. All have fierce blue eyes, red hair, huge frames, fit only for a sudden exertion. They are less able to bear laborious work. Heat and thirst they cannot in the least endure; to cold and hunger their climate and their soil inure them. . . .

Government. Influence of Women

They choose their kings by birth, their generals for merit. These kings have not unlimited or arbitrary power, and the generals do more by example than by authority. If they are energetic, if they are conspicuous, if they fight in the front, they lead because they are admired. But to reprimand, to imprison, even to flog, is permitted to the priests alone, and that not as a punishment, or at the general’s bidding, but, as it were, by the mandate of the god whom they believe to inspire the warrior. They also carry with them into battle certain figures and images taken from their sacred groves. And what most stimulates their courage is, that their squadrons or battalions, instead of being formed by chance or by a fortuitous gathering, are composed of families and clans. Close by them, too, are those dearest to them, so that they hear the shrieks of women, the cries of infants. They are to every man the most sacred witnesses of his bravery—they are his most generous applauders. The soldier brings his wounds to mother and wife, who shrink not from counting or even demanding them and who administer both food and encouragement to the combatants. . . .

Councils

About minor matters the chiefs deliberate, about the more important the whole tribe. Yet even when the final decision rests with the people, the affair is always thoroughly discussed by the chiefs. They assemble, except in the case of a sudden emergency, on certain fixed days, either at new or at full moon; for this they consider the most auspicious season for the transaction of business. . . . When the multitude think proper, they sit down armed. Silence is proclaimed by the priests, who have on these occasions the right of keeping order. Then the king or the chief, according to age, birth, distinction in war, or eloquence, is heard, more because he has influence to persuade than because he has power to command. If his sentiments displease them, they reject them with murmurs; if they are satisfied, they brandish their spears. . . .

Training of the Youth

They transact no public or private business without being armed. It is not, however, usual for anyone to wear arms till the state has recognized his power to use them. Then in the presence of the council one of the chiefs, or the young man’s father, or some kinsman, equips him with a shield and a spear. These arms are what the “toga” is with us, the first honor with which youth is invested. Up to this time he is regarded as a member of a household, afterwards as a member of the commonwealth. Very noble birth or great services rendered by the father secure for lads the rank of a chief; such lads attach themselves to men of mature strength and of long approved valor. It is no shame to be seen among a chief’s followers. Even in his escort there are gradations of rank, dependent on the choice of the man to whom they are attached. These followers vie keenly with each other as to who shall rank first with his chief, the chiefs as to who shall have the most numerous and the bravest followers. It is an honor as well as a source of strength to be thus always surrounded by a large body of picked youths; it is an ornament in peace and a defense in war. And not only in his own tribe but also in the neighboring states it is the renown and glory of a chief to be distinguished for the number and valor of his followers, for such a man is courted by embassies, is honored with presents, and the very prestige of his name often settles a war. . . .

Habits in Time of Peace

Whenever they are not fighting, they pass much of their time in the chase, and still more in idleness, giving themselves up to sleep and to feasting, the bravest and the most warlike doing nothing, and surrendering the management of the household, of the home, and of the land, to the women, the old men, and all the weakest members of the family. They themselves lie buried in sloth, a strange combination in their nature that the same men should be so fond of idleness, so averse to peace. . . .

Arrangement of Their Towns. Subterranean Dwellings

It is well known that the nations of Germany have no cities, and that they do not even tolerate closely contiguous dwellings. They live scattered and apart, just as a spring, a meadow, or a wood has attracted them. Their villages they do not arrange in our fashion, with the buildings connected and joined together, but every person surrounds his dwelling with an open space, either as a precaution against the disasters of fire, or because they do not know how to build. No use is made by them of stone or tile; they employ timber for all purposes, rude masses without ornament or attractiveness. Some parts of their buildings they stain more carefully with a clay so clear and bright that it resembles painting, or a colored design. . . .

Dress

They all wrap themselves in a cloak which is fastened with a clasp, or, if this is not forthcoming, with a thorn, leaving the rest of their persons bare. They pass whole days on the hearth by the fire. The wealthiest are distinguished by a dress which is not flowing, like that of the Sarmatæ and Parthi, but is tight, and exhibits each limb. They also wear the skins of wild beasts; the tribes on the Rhine and Danube in a careless fashion, those of the interior with more elegance, as not obtaining other clothing by commerce. These select certain animals, the hides of which they strip off and vary them with the spotted skins of beasts, the produce of the outer ocean, and of seas unknown to us. The women have the same dress as the men, except that they generally wrap themselves in linen garments, which they embroider with purple, and do not lengthen out the upper part of their clothing into sleeves. The upper and lower arm is thus bare, and the nearest part of the bosom is also exposed.

Marriage Laws

Their marriage code, however, is strict, and indeed no part of their manners is more praiseworthy. Almost alone among barbarians they are content with one wife, except a very few among them, and these not from sensuality, but because their noble birth procures for them many offers of alliance. The wife does not bring a dower to the husband, but the husband to the wife. The parents and relatives are present, and pass judgment on the marriage-gifts, gifts not meant to suit a woman’s taste, nor such as a bride would deck herself with, but oxen, a caparisoned steed, a shield, a lance, and a sword. With these presents the wife is espoused, and she herself in her turn brings her husband a gift of arms. This they count their strongest bond of union, these their sacred mysteries, these their gods of marriage. Lest the woman should think herself to stand apart from aspirations after noble deeds and from the perils of war, she is reminded by the ceremony which inaugurates marriage that she is her husband’s partner in toil and danger, destined to suffer and to dare with him alike both in peace and in war. The yoked oxen, the harnessed steed, the gift of arms, proclaim this fact. She must live and die with the feeling that she is receiving what she must hand down to her children neither tarnished nor depreciated, what future daughters-in-law may receive, and may be so passed on to her grandchildren.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

  1. How does Tacitus portray the German tribes’ way of life? What aspects does he admire? What aspects does he criticize?

    Question

    rmW12co5EKjrjCe7rkU42lD4OuqPVruxod/5TXHqZxQNKMiYyKhYyLT33n6QUCK6c69t860OMjn9qYbyxXPYwkolIIcX0UEtgXHkjpgrcCRx+PTOgWqOTNmaUrWNqMwNAqZ+2mpr3BtOJ1ZrWrri5mdTOGytxqOy8Z+zjKC/v7cMR6a+W47fmFQ++w6yJbe13wwoQiH+VlG528ibuKZdf06JPFs=
    How does Tacitus portray the German tribes’ way of life? What aspects does he admire? What aspects does he criticize?
  2. What message do you think Tacitus was trying to convey to his audience in his assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of Germanic society?

    Question

    5qoiPwY6QD3fG+TBMd4oICGefz/8JeL/EoqcDRRjKM18kV2l7DzhICN+4QYKHdtvKYLkRMMjs4P/xP5e4ME/pRd8gb/A6vQNZYIKSKhmPLadMf7yl7fP6o/y0+PUtvFYlSQBybR0QXCVWtP27vDDZA3cufQ9YG7Hf3et/yG7MI7MNtHqhFarin0yuQZq6wMx6yJFdVbBfmwKdGfq2jMImE7ApYdj3qXdrOXLshaQ5F3OERmKMiz4lw==
    What message do you think Tacitus was trying to convey to his audience in his assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of Germanic society?
  3. What role did women play in Germanic society? What was their relationship with men? Why do you think that Tacitus singled out this topic in particular for elaboration?

    Question

    dlTPkJgjP58oqalI1p0gJ44Lh8mZqssDCWOWUkUDHgidjdHopPwPrHspEV1/TYwxuHadYgbkfBVH5ePEYz5sTCMOoCPRL/ESuUwecv2bLc3tigy/ZhN6YZ7jHGKrhUD07dO8fFUiHHutsZ8V9O/mgfDNzlMrPaT7XJdNYSKEWrQ0wvzenwgrD/6XPpnwazGCBYWe9BOZ+za+XDni+Z9XaZR9x568g+xnGcxcog+JI2AybICAX82Ex1oL2HXiOaWz7BZ8oVVxfhlOkyBiivjUZgkGh10=
    What role did women play in Germanic society? What was their relationship with men? Why do you think that Tacitus singled out this topic in particular for elaboration?