6. Imperialism and Opium

6.
Imperialism and Opium

Commissioner Lin, Letter to Queen Victoria (1839)

The Industrial Revolution was not the only factor reshaping the European economy in the first half of the nineteenth century. With the abolition of slavery by Great Britain and many other nations, European governments shifted focus away from their Caribbean plantation colonies toward new colonies in Asia and Africa. British merchants took the lead in opening up China to trade with the West, armed with an extremely addictive commodity—opium. For them, the importation of the drug into China was a legitimate commercial enterprise. The Chinese government held a different view, however, as the letter below reveals. The Chinese emperor had appointed Lin Tse-hsü (1785–1850) to address the opium problem, which he proposed to do with a two-pronged strategy: cutting off the supply of opium and punishing all users and sellers, including foreign traders. Lin wrote to British Queen Victoria (r. 1837–1901) seeking support for this policy. There is no evidence that she ever received his letter, excerpted here, but it was published later in the London Times. Ultimately, Britain waged the first of two Opium Wars (1839–1842) to secure the continuation of the opium trade and gain a territorial foothold in the region.

From William H. McNeill and Mitsuko Iriye, eds., Modern Asia and Africa (New York: Oxford University Press, 1971), 113–18.

We find that your country is distant from us, . . . that your foreign ships come hither striving the one with the other for our trade, and for the simple reason of their strong desire to reap a profit. Now, out of the wealth of our Inner Land, if we take a part to bestow upon foreigners from afar, it follows, that the immense wealth which the said foreigners amass, ought properly speaking to be portion of our own native Chinese people. By what principle of reason then, should these foreigners send in return a poisonous drug, which involves in destruction those very natives of China? Without meaning to say that the foreigners harbor such destructive intentions in their hearts, we yet positively assert that from their inordinate thirst after gain, they are perfectly careless about the injuries they inflict upon us! And such being the case, we should like to ask what has become of that conscience which heaven has implanted in the breasts of all men?

We have heard that in your own country opium is prohibited with the utmost strictness and severity:—this is a strong proof that you know full well how hurtful it is to mankind. Since then you do not permit it to injure your own country, you ought not to have the injurious drug transferred to another country, and above all others, how much less to the Inner Land! Of the products which China exports to your foreign countries, there is not one which is not beneficial to mankind in some shape or other. There are those which serve for food, those which are useful, and those which are calculated for re-sale;—but all are beneficial. . . .

On the other hand, the things that come from your foreign countries are only calculated to make presents of, or serve for mere amusement. It is quite the same to us if we have them, or if we have them not. If then these are of no material consequence to us of the Inner Land, what difficulty would there be in prohibiting and shutting our market against them? It is only that our heavenly dynasty most freely permits you to take off her tea, silk, and other commodities, and convey them for consumption everywhere, without the slightest stint or grudge, for no other reason, but that where a profit exists, we wish that it be diffused abroad for the benefit of all the earth!

Your honorable nation takes away the products of our central land, and not only do you thereby obtain food and support for yourselves, but moreover, by re-selling these products to other countries you reap a threefold profit. Now if you would only not sell opium, this threefold profit would be secured to you: how can you possibly consent to forego it for a drug that is hurtful to men, and an unbridled craving after gain that seems to know no bounds! Let us suppose that foreigners came from another country, and brought opium into England, and seduced the people of your country to smoke it, would not you, the sovereign of the said country, look upon such a procedure with anger, and in your just indignation endeavor to get rid of it? Now we have always heard that your highness possesses a most kind and benevolent heart, surely then you are incapable of doing or causing to be done unto another, that which you should not wish another to do unto you! . . .

Suppose the subject of another country were to come to England to trade, he would certainly be required to comply with the laws of England, then how much more does this apply to us of the celestial empire! Now it is a fixed statute of this empire, that any native Chinese who sells opium is punishable with death, and even he who merely smokes it, must not less die. Pause and reflect for a moment: if you foreigners did not bring the opium hither, where should our Chinese people get it to re-sell? It is your foreigners who involve our simple natives in the pit of death, and are they alone to be permitted to escape alive? If so much as one of those deprive one of our people of his life, he must forfeit his life in requital for that which he has taken:—how much more does this apply to him who by means of opium destroys his fellow-men? Does the havoc which he commits stop with a single life? Therefore it is that those foreigners who now import opium into the Central Land are condemned to be beheaded and strangled by the new statute. . . .

Our celestial empire rules over ten thousand kingdoms! Most surely do we possess a measure of godlike majesty which you cannot fathom! Still we cannot bear to slay or exterminate without previous warning, and it is for this reason that we now clearly make known to you the fixed laws of our land. If the foreign merchants of your said honorable nation desire to continue their commercial intercourse, they then must tremblingly obey our recorded statutes, they must cut off for ever the source from which the opium flows, and on no account make an experiment of our laws in their own persons! Let then your highness punish those of your subjects who may be criminal, do not endeavor to screen or conceal them, and thus you will secure peace and quietness to your possessions, thus will you more than ever display a proper sense of respect and obedience, and thus may we unitedly enjoy the common blessing of peace and happiness.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

  1. How does Lin describe economic relations between Britain and China? Which country benefits the most according to his view? Why is this important to his argument against the import of opium?

    Question

    1QZc+sX3uv8WeZlG+YQTvG1ovRD9ijxhG1T9uEG4BK4I8lFfCA/QUKTCAK8pQgxGWEY2nhas4jFt0lworMIqDQzA456jDJDpT6tavuN/ugZBbeSxwnM0pkasmovFSC3Vg+ds4h8RpHL9CukjYHWbK1LAD0h3a0nqooulNhuRRQFB5ZajqhiM/jsV9gMXJib1PlwOdikhEf21RvRL0brQrP0bkJoeL7abRf6gU431Fn2dgqWFmwP/ZdbG3GBpNdkxw2Rsa21+VgXOGjX/M0jDS2nBk+dEUZvAk+DdNdCdMkuci9YfbIq9uA==
    How does Lin describe economic relations between Britain and China? Which country benefits the most according to his view? Why is this important to his argument against the import of opium?
  2. Why does Lin set opium apart from the other goods imported by Britain into China? How does he describe the drug’s effects on the Chinese people?

    Question

    sK1tA4wM4d5OQ0eNX8olR7Q8AILy4sB1hDq6ReR3pqsA2YfjKEjhz73hoQ1xoaFlK1WGeRNkO5P0yeMhn808renFZ0BD73QT/UDyfiAlMVPQe2R0LXP4s1bnTfYZxOqkaTKlD7nq9krI5cYvCDH6DYfpTRP5H0FxFa74WnORfsTdIA84SIXl6BBX1M325hnuHNlCsOiNRZjjWMKml1dPEkw0Sz8nASK0mbKTFm1XVFMozyhTh6cKgD0a6Pc=
    Why does Lin set opium apart from the other goods imported by Britain into China? How does he describe the drug’s effects on the Chinese people?
  3. Why does Lin accuse the British government of hypocrisy in its attitudes toward opium?

    Question

    u0oXQ0GDoM7v+zvj50BOG4j60QB5Hm0fE3WYcoMh2NrcDUK3K1OsE4gn7uKFkRpB8VrCdUMzObQtudv0iFCL2iP3Lo6Q5IuTnd8UDw3TKtqF+DgokcmRHraI5/fv339iW/sjpBNcJylhUUppPTMatUDtELDp2R4QhvYYbRpxeSI=
    Why does Lin accuse the British government of hypocrisy in its attitudes toward opium?
  4. How would you describe Lin’s tone in this letter? What does it suggest about how he viewed Western culture in general?

    Question

    XssCQpxZYlZGIun+GXqE1Y7JOW6icep4u/yrqcGVFnY4w6T+mUx5R4rIkgYoLNo4pA1spJEjAk7jOtgAyrQ7iqLL6db8R7BDJ6+nwqJb99TSZWRREOpQuGPnG9DRBISHOzT8nxUrVVmhsKqRQlaV+JmXimeT8flnjEzbZX3WLHwCsVBvxrSMhlwR5l2o+i915pGxHXHVSa1i5bEYklXwtwUqpkE=
    How would you describe Lin’s tone in this letter? What does it suggest about how he viewed Western culture in general?