PROBLEMS

  1. Question 18.7

    Since the crash of its stock market in 1989, the Japanese economy has seen little economic growth and some deflation. The accompanying table from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shows some key macroeconomic data for Japan for 1991 (a “normal” year) and 1995–2003.

    Year

    Real GDP annual growth rate

    Short-term interest rate

    Government debt (percent of GDP)

    Government budget deficit (percent of GDP)

    1991

         3.4%

       7.38%

         64.8%

     −1.81%

    1995

      1.9

    1.23

      87.1

    4.71

    1996

      3.4

    0.59

      93.9

    5.07

    1997

      1.9

    0.60

    100.3

    3.79

    1998

    −1.1

    0.72

    112.2

    5.51

    1999

      0.1

    0.25

    125.7

    7.23

    2000

      2.8

    0.25

    134.1

    7.48

    2001

      0.4

    0.12

    142.3

    6.13

    2002

    −0.3

    0.06

    149.3

    7.88

    2003

      2.5

    0.04

    157.5

    7.67

    1. From the data, determine the type of policies Japan’s policy makers undertook at that time to promote growth.

    2. We can safely consider a short-term interest rate that is less than 0.1% to effectively be a 0% interest rate. What is this situation called? What does it imply about the effectiveness of monetary policy? Of fiscal policy?

  2. Question 18.8

    The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) maintains the official chronology of past U.S. business cycles. Go to its website at www.nber.org/cycles/cyclesmain.html to answer the following questions.

    1. How many business cycles have occurred since the end of World War II in 1945?

    2. What was the average duration of a business cycle when measured from the end of one expansion (its peak) to the end of the next? That is, what was the average duration of a business cycle in the period from 1945 to 2001?

    3. When was the last announcement by the NBER’s Business Cycle Dating Committee, and what was it?

  3. Question 18.9

    The fall of its military rival, the Soviet Union, in 1989 allowed the United States to significantly reduce its defense spending in subsequent years. Using the data in the following table from the Economic Report of the President, replicate Figure 33-3 for the 1990–2000 period. Given the strong economic growth in the United States during the late 1990s, why would a Keynesian see the reduction in defense spending during the 1990s as a good thing?

    Year

    Budget deficit (percent of GDP)

    Unemployment rate

    1990

         3.9%

       5.6%

    1991

      4.5

    6.8

    1992

      4.7

    7.5

    1993

      3.9

    6.9

    1994

      2.9

    6.1

    1995

      2.2

    5.6

    1996

      1.4

    5.4

    1997

      0.3

    4.9

    1998

    −0.8

    4.5

    1999

    −1.4

    4.2

    2000

    −2.4

    4.0

  4. Question 18.10

    In the modern world, central banks are free to increase or reduce the money supply as they see fit. However, some people harken back to the “good old days” of the gold standard. Under the gold standard, the money supply could expand only when the amount of available gold increased.

    1. Under the gold standard, if the velocity of money were stable when the economy was expanding, what would have had to happen to keep prices stable?

    2. Why would modern macroeconomists consider the gold standard a bad idea?

  5. Question 18.11

    The chapter explains that Kenneth Rogoff proclaimed Richard Nixon “the all-time hero of political business cycles.” Using the upcoming table of data from the Economic Report of the President, explain why Nixon may have earned that title. (Note: Nixon entered office in January 1969 and was reelected in November 1972. He resigned in August 1974.)

    Year

    Government receipts (billions of dollars)

    Government spending (billions of dollars)

    Government budget balance (billions of dollars)

    M1 growth

    M2 growth

    3-month Treasury bill rate

    1969

    $186.9

    $183.6

    $3.2

    3.3%

    3.7%

    6.68%

    1970

    192.8

    195.6

    −2.8

    5.1

    6.6

    6.46

    1971

    187.1

    210.2

    −23.0

    6.5

    13.4

    4.35

    1972

    207.3

    230.7

    −23.4

    9.2

    13.0

    4.07

    1973

    230.8

    245.7

    −14.9

    5.5

    6.6

    7.04

  6. Question 18.12

    The economy of Albernia is facing a recessionary gap, and the leader of that nation calls together five of its best economists representing the classical, Keynesian, monetarist, real business cycle, and Great Moderation consensus views of the macroeconomy. Explain what policies each economist would recommend and why.

  7. Question 18.13

    Which of the following policy recommendations are consistent with the classical, Keynesian, monetarist, and/or Great Moderation consensus views of the macroeconomy?

    1. Since the long-run growth of GDP is 2%, the money supply should grow at 2%.

    2. Decrease government spending in order to decrease inflationary pressure.

    3. Increase the money supply in order to alleviate a recessionary gap.

    4. Always maintain a balanced budget.

    5. Decrease the budget deficit as a percent of GDP when facing a recessionary gap.

  8. Question 18.14

    Using a graph like Figure 33-4, show how a monetarist can argue that a contractionary fiscal policy need not lead to a fall in real GDP given a fixed money supply. Explain.

WORK IT OUT

For interactive, step-by-step help solving the following problem, check out this Work It Out tutorial under student resources.

Question 18.15

9. Monetarists believed for a period of time that the velocity of money was stable within a country. However, with financial innovation, the velocity began shifting around erratically after 1980. As would be expected, the velocity of money is different across countries depending upon the sophistication of their financial systems—velocity of money tends to be higher in countries with developed financial systems. The accompanying table provides money supply and GDP information in 2013 for six countries.

Country

National currency

M1 (billions in national currency)

Nominal GDP (billions in national currency)

Egypt

Egyptian pounds

431

1,753

South Korea

Korean won

515,643

1,428,294

Thailand

Thai baht

1,608

11,898

United States

U.S. dollars

2,832

16,800

Kenya

Kenyan pounds

967

3,797

India

Indian rupees

19,118

113,550

Source: World Bank.

  1. Calculate the velocity of money for each of the countries. The accompanying table shows GDP per capita for each of these countries in 2013 in U.S. dollars.

    Country

    Nominal GDP per capita (U.S. dollars)

    Egypt

    $3,225

    South Korea

    24,328

    Thailand

      5,674

    United States

    53,101

    Kenya

      1,016

    India

      1,504

    Source: IMF.

  2. Rank the countries in descending order of per capita income and velocity of money. Do wealthy countries or poor countries tend to “turn over” their money more times per year? Would you expect wealthy countries to have more sophisticated financial systems?