As you respond to the following prompts, support your argument with references to at least three of the sources in this Conversation on American Politics and the English Language. For help using sources, see Chapter 4.
The political power of words lies not primarily in their form—that is, in speech—or even in the meanings they are directly linked to, but in the totality of brain circuitry that activation can spread to: the frames, metaphors, prototypes, metonymies, and the entire system of concepts. Words matter. They shape our politics—and our lives.
Write an essay that supports, challenges, or qualifies Lakoff’s assertion. Develop your position with evidence from your own experience along with at least three sources from this Conversation.
After a recent visit to the National Museum of the American Indian on the Mall, I’m wondering how much longer our city will tolerate having a football team known as “Redskins.”
It’s a racist name, patently offensive and the incongruence is simply ridiculous: a world-class institution devoted to showcasing Native American heritage in a city whose leading sports franchise makes a mockery of that heritage.
Write an essay agreeing or disagreeing with Milloy’s assertion that the name “Washington Redskins” should be changed. Argue specifically about this team in the nation’s capital, or broaden your argument to the use of Native American names in sports in general.