Introduction

Chapter 1. The Runner's Experiment

Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry
false
true
true

Case Study: The Runner's Experiment

By Justin Hines, Lafayette College and Marcy Osgood, University of New Mexico

Popup content goes in this box

New box content

Instructor's Notes

Topic Pre-requisites: Students should have exposure to the topics of Chapters 14–18 and ideally Sections 23.2 and 23.3 of Lehninger, 6th ed.

Overview

This capstone-type case is designed to help students understand the importance of gluconeogenic substrates in human metabolism and the interconnections between carbohydrate, fat, and protein metabolism in humans. Because the focus of this case is the integration of metabolic pathways, we recommend that students be exposed to the topics of Chapters 14–18 and ideally Sections 23.2 and 23.3 of the textbook (Lehninger POB,6th ed.) before beginning this case. These latter two sections could be assigned as preliminary reading before initiating the case if they have not been explicitly covered in the class; in that case, we recommend allowing students additional time to complete this case study.

Students may work individually or in groups to complete this case study. Students are constantly encouraged to refer to their textbook throughout the case, and internet access is permitted, although it is not necessary for the completion of the case. Students are required to iteratively acquire, analyze, and integrate data as they progress through the case and answer assessment questions found throughout the case. All assessment questions are automatically scored.

For this case, students will need to explore all investigative options to complete the case, and so, unlike some other cases in this collection, the number of investigations that students make use of will not be reported.

Learning Objectives

This case is intended for remediating or extending student capabilities in these difficult topics:

  1. Real-world applications of the study of human metabolism. Students will:
    • utilize real biochemical tests to evaluate and “solve” a metabolic disorder case.
    • consider the importance of factors like personal and family history, diet, medications taken, and symptoms in solving a biochemical case.
  2. Critical and interrelated pathways in human central metabolism. Students will:
    • review carbohydrate, lipid, and amino acid metabolic pathways.
    • review fatty acid metabolism and recognize the distinctions between the oxidation of even- and odd-chain fatty acids.
  3. Connections between carbohydrate, fat, and protein metabolism in humans. Students should be able to:
    • outline and explain the importance of gluconeogenic substrates in human metabolism.
      • understand why the inability to convert acetyl-CoA to gluconeogenic substrates in humans leads to protein wasting.
      • explain the importance of ketone body formation and ammonia transport/disposal in human metabolism.
    • explain the important differences between the metabolic intermediates produced by the oxidation of even vs. odd-chain fatty acids.
  4. Practice critical thinking skills involving data. Students will:
    • evaluate data provided by metabolite and enzyme tests.
    • integrate multiple pieces of biochemical data.

Some questions are designed to address areas of difficulty for students

  • Students are often confused about the necessity to maintain glucose homeostasis, even in the presence of circulating ketone bodies… that is, the concept that glucose must always be exported from the liver under all circumstances in the fasted state is not clear to most students.
  • The significance of a fundamental disconnect in human metabolism--the absence of a metabolic pathway to convert acetyl-CoA ultimately to glucose--is often underappreciated or missed entirely by some students.
  • The role of protein wasting as a necessary, but unfortunate consequence of the need for gluconeogenic precursors in the absence of dietary carbohydrates or stored glycogen. It is both a critical aspect of human metabolism and a relevant real-world connection given the rise of protein-heavy diets in Western society (Atkins, etc.).
  • Author note: A common error is to jump immediately into testing a “pet” hypothesis by conducting laboratory tests (metabolite assays or enzyme assays) before exploring “data gathering” options like visual inspections or interviews with the person. This is an excellent and intentionally designed opportunity to point out a common mistake about the scientific method-- that is, it begins with making careful observations, rather than by immediately testing quickly formed hypotheses.

Suggested implementation

Below we describe two options for course implementation. The hybrid Online/In-class approach is recommended. Time required for students to complete the online case will vary by group depending on their level of discussion between each investigation. The case study can be started and stopped, and so it is recommended to give students a window of 3 to 5 days in which to complete the assignment.

Hybrid: Online/In-class: (recommended approach; ~30 minutes of class-time expected)

  1. Share the case study link with your students to work online outside of class, preferably in pairs or groups of three. Assign the case study to be due before your next class meeting. Students should be instructed to bring copies of notes and answers to assessment questions to the following class period.
  2. Review the online answers before the following class for difficult areas for students (see expected areas of difficulty above).
  3. Lead students in a discussion in pairs, groups, or as a class (depending upon class size and instructor preference) to address unresolved difficulties (~30 minutes in-class time).
  4. After using the case, we recommend that you select questions from the supplied assessment questions to use on exams or as homework assignments to reinforce the difficult concepts covered. Please see the document “Exam Questions for Case 4: Integration of Metabolism.”

Online only approach: (minimal in-class time required)

  1. Share the case study link with your students to work online, preferably in pairs or groups of three. Assign the case study to be due before your next class meeting.
  2. Review the online answers for difficult areas for students (see expected areas of difficulty above).
  3. Mention or remediate tough points during a portion of lecture.
  4. After using the case, we recommend that you select questions from the supplied assessment questions to use on exams or as homework assignments to reinforce the difficult concepts covered. Please see the document “Exam Questions for Case 4: Integration of Metabolism.”

Suggestions for in-class discussions (these questions may also be used in summative assessments-- i.e., exams, scored quizzes, etc.):

  • What were some of the most important facts in the initial presentation of Dave and Michael’s case and why were they important?
    • Students could be directed to brainstorm in groups or as a whole class.
  • What were some of the most important facts of Dave and Michael’s case that were revealed as a result of your investigations and why were they important?
    • Students could be directed to brainstorm in groups or as a whole class.
  • What are some issues associated with someone trying to do a diet that is completely based on one type of macronutrient, like fat in this case, or for example a diet entirely of protein?
    • Could be easily used as a think-pair-share exercise.
    • Alternatively, students could first answer this question in writing individually, and then those responses could be collected or discussed in groups and revised.
  • What was the relevance of the brothers being identical twins with respect to this case and to biochemistry in general--i.e., what might we have been concerned about if the brothers were not twins?
  • What is the significance of the two oils the brothers were eating?
  • What was the significance of Michael’s neurological issues?
  • Why did Michael have lower levels of immunoglobins and higher levels of ketone bodies than Dave?
  • Why are high levels of ketone bodies dangerous?

You are missing vital information

You may be missing vital information needed to sufficiently explain this incident. You must complete all investigations before proceeding to the final assessment questions.

You are missing vital information

You may be missing vital information needed to sufficiently explain this incident. You must complete all investigations before proceeding to the final assessment questions.

Race day had come. “Finally,” thought Michael. He was a marathon veteran, but this race was different. He felt terrible. “Probably a cold” he had told his girlfriend, but nothing was going to stop him today. Today was the day he would finally prove his brother Dave wrong and he had 26.2 miles to do it.

The two young men shook hands shortly before the race started. Dave was thin, like Michael, but not “gaunt”. Michael’s girlfriend Jan had actually used that word to describe Michael a few days before. His cheeks had receded recently. “Seriously, you should stop this… you look terrible!” Jan said. “It’s just pre-race training… and of course, the experiment,” he thought. “I’ll be fine!” he assured her with a wink before leaving their apartment.

“Today is the day we settle this!” he now called to Dave as they took off down the race route, but Dave only smiled and accelerated to leave Michael behind. As Dave disappeared into the crowd, Michael called out, “It’s not about speed! It’s about endurance dummy!”, but Dave was too far ahead to hear.

For weeks they had been talking about their plan, the experiment, and how much money they were going to make. Michael smiled to himself and then put his head down to focus on the run. Dave was long gone but Michael was certain that he would see him again soon enough… that is, until he started to feel dizzy…

Juan had worked at several marathon medical tents before. It was always the same: people try to run the race without training properly, and they end up at the tents. Most are dehydrated and exhausted, others just “hit the wall,” when their bodies run out of glycogen, and some even have heart attacks, mainly due to poor training. This particular day wasn’t very hot, but it didn’t take much to overwhelm people during a marathon. Working the races was a nice excuse for an ER doctor to get out in the sun for a few hours on the weekend and a chance to help some people… for Juan that was as addicting as running.

Two hours in and Juan was bored. The chatter on the radio was the same as always: dehydrated runners at both tents, and one elderly person from the crowd had to be treated for heat exhaustion, though it was really just from standing too long… so far it was a slow day.

Suddenly the radio chatter picked up. The ambulance from the medical tent at the 10-mile mark was headed in to his location at the finish line with a young man who was non-responsive. The incoming call was interrupted by a second voice: the ambulance from the medical tent at the 20-mile mark ALSO had a non-responsive man. ‘What are the odds?’ Juan thought. The two ambulances arrived simultaneously. Runner ID tags identified both subjects immediately: Michael and Dave Gard, two brothers! Dave was unconscious, but otherwise looked OK. When Juan saw Michael, however, he was startled into action; he would not have guessed that the two men were brothers!

You are a biochemistry student and you are shadowing an ER doctor who has just admitted two young males. One man, Dave, regained consciousness before arrival, whereas the other, Michael, regained consciousness only after arriving at the hospital and is still delirious. Neither man was particularly dehydrated, having drunk water during the race. Both have been stabilized, but blood and urine samples from before they were treated are available for you to test. It is up to you to discover what might be the problem with the two brothers.

Consider that there are two primary questions to answer:

  1. What caused both brothers to lose consciousness during the race? Here are some potential biochemical hypotheses for you to consider:
    • Ketoacidosis
    • Lactic acidosis
    • Ammonia toxicity
    • Mercury poisoning
    • Acute hyperglycemia due to type II diabetes
    • Hypoglycemia
    • Phenylketonuria
    • Maple-syrup urine disease
  2. What is the biochemical explanation for the differences in the conditions of the two brothers?

You may now conduct additional investigations to explore the details of this case and to test hypotheses so that you can eventually answer both questions. Note: for this case, you are encouraged to explore ALL possible investigations to gather as much information as possible to explain the case before finishing the case by continuing to the final case assessments.

You have now completed the investigations and can go on to answer the following questions, which will give you the opportunity to demonstrate your understanding of Dave’s and Michael’s conditions.

inv121
true

11.

The citric acid cycle begins with the condensation of acetyl-CoA with oxaloacetate. Possible sources for carbon that may be converted into acetyl-CoA in active muscle include: (Mark "yes" for ALL that apply!)

a. pyruvate
b. β-oxidation of fatty acids
c. amino acid catabolism
d. conversion of ketone bodies from the blood back to acetyl-CoA
e. stored glycogen in the muscle
4
You have not identified all correct answers. Please review pages 686–687 of Lehninger, 6th ed., for information about ketone bodies and Table 23-2 (page 942 of Lehninger, 6th ed,) to review other possible sources of acetyl-CoA and try again.
Correct.
Incorrect.
true
inv109
true
inv110
true
inv111
true
inv112
true
inv113
true
inv114
true
inv115
true
inv116
true
inv117
true
inv118
true
inv119
true
inv120
true

Activity results are being submitted...

Congratulations on completing this Case Study! The following Case Summary gives a full explanations of the two brothers’ conditions.

Case Summary

Because the human body cannot create glucose from the oxidation of even-chain fatty acids, both runners are starving their bodies of glucose due to their restrictive diets. Most of their energy is coming from fatty acid oxidation, so ketone bodies are being produced to free up CoA for more β-oxidation. Because their diet lacks carbohydrates and glucogenic amino acids, their glycogen levels will be very low before the race, regardless of their caloric intake. Their blood sugar is low and their bodies are compensating through protein wasting, resulting in their thin and emaciated appearances, and through ketone body production, resulting in acidified blood.

The differences between the two brothers’ conditions are not due to genetic polymorphisms (they are identical twins), but rather, arise from the composition of odd- vs. even-numbered fatty acids in their respective supplements. Even-chain fatty acids are NOT gluconeogenic precursors because the product of even-numbered fatty acid chain oxidation is multiple 2-carbon acetyl groups bound to CoA. Humans lack the enzymes necessary to use acetyl-CoA as a gluconeogenic precursor. In contrast, odd-numbered fatty acid catabolism produces one succinate (a 4-carbon citric acid cycle intermediate) for each fatty acid molecule oxidized. The result is that two glucose molecules (12 carbons total) can be produced from the oxidation of every three odd-numbered fatty acids.

Dave’s case is milder because the supplement he is taking contains a significant amount of odd-numbered fatty acids, and some of these may be used to produce glucose. Michael’s supplement has almost no odd-numbered fatty acids, so his body is undergoing more protein wasting (resulting in lower levels of non-essential body proteins like immunoglobins), and producing dangerous levels of ketones.

Ketone bodies are being formed BOTH from the products of β-oxidation of the fatty acids from the ingested fish oil and from ketogenic amino acids released from protein catabolism. Michael’s levels are higher than Dave’s because his body is undergoing protein wasting at a greater rate. Higher rates of protein wasting are the reason for Michael’s elevated levels of Asp aminotransferase (AST) and Ala aminotransferase (ALT). These enzymes (and additional aminotransfereases) are being produced in greater quantities to carry out the massive amount of amino acid deamination that must occur under these conditions. As a result of excessive protein degradation, Michael is also experiencing mild ammonia toxicity (in addition to all his other problems!). Ammonia passes readily through the blood-brain barrier and is highly toxic to the brain.

Total:
$0