The different species concepts are not mutually exclusive

Many named variants of these three major classes of species concepts exist. These various concepts are not incompatible; they simply emphasize different aspects of species or speciation. The morphological species concept emphasizes the practical aspects of recognizing species, although it sometimes results in underestimation or overestimation of the actual number of species. Mayr’s biological species concept emphasizes that reproductive isolation is what allows sexual species to evolve independently of one another. The lineage species concept embraces the idea that sexual species are maintained by reproductive isolation, but extends the concept of a species as a lineage over evolutionary time. The species-as-lineage concept also accommodates species that reproduce asexually.

Virtually all species exhibit some degree of genetic recombination among individuals, even if recombination events are relatively rare. Significant reproductive isolation between species is therefore necessary for lineages to remain distinct over evolutionary time. Furthermore, reproductive isolation is responsible for the morphological distinctiveness of most species, because mutations that result in morphological changes cannot spread between reproductively isolated species. Therefore no matter which species concept we emphasize, the evolution of reproductive isolation is important for understanding the origin of species.

Although Charles Darwin titled his groundbreaking book On the Origin of Species, in fact it included very little about speciation as we understand it today. Darwin devoted most of his attention to demonstrating that individual species are altered over time by natural selection. The remaining sections of this chapter will discuss the many aspects of speciation that biologists have learned about since Darwin’s time.