Lesson 1: In the long run, a country’s capacity to produce goods and services determines the standard of living of its citizens.
Of all the measures of economic performance introduced in Chapter 2 and used throughout this book, the one that best measures economic well–being is GDP. Real GDP measures the economy’s total output of goods and services and, therefore, a country’s ability to satisfy the needs and desires of its citizens. Nations with higher GDP per person have more of almost everything—bigger homes, more cars, higher literacy, better health care, longer life expectancy, and more Internet connections. Perhaps the most important question in macroeconomics is what determines the level and the growth of GDP.
The models in Chapter 3, Chapter 8, and Chapter 9 identify the long–run determinants of GDP. In the long run, GDP depends on the factors of production—capital and labor—and on the technology used to turn capital and labor into output. GDP grows when the factors of production increase or when the economy becomes better at turning these inputs into an output of goods and services.
This lesson has an obvious but important corollary: public policy can raise GDP in the long run only by improving the productive capability of the economy. There are many ways in which policymakers can attempt to do this. Policies that raise national saving—either through higher public saving or higher private saving—eventually lead to a larger capital stock. Policies that raise the efficiency of labor—such as those that improve education or promote technological progress—lead to a more productive use of capital and labor. Policies that improve a nation’s institutions—such as crackdowns on official corruption—lead to both greater capital accumulation and a more efficient use of the economy’s resources. All these policies increase the economy’s output of goods and services and, thereby, improve the standard of living. It is less clear, however, which of these policies is the best way to raise an economy’s productive capability.
Lesson 2: In the short run, aggregate demand influences the amount of goods and services that a country produces.
Although the economy’s ability to supply goods and services is the sole determinant of GDP in the long run, in the short run GDP depends also on the aggregate demand for goods and services. Aggregate demand is of key importance because prices are sticky in the short run. The IS–LM model developed in Chapter 11 and Chapter 12 shows what causes changes in aggregate demand and, therefore, short–run fluctuations in GDP.
Because aggregate demand influences output in the short run, all the variables that affect aggregate demand can influence economic fluctuations. Monetary policy, fiscal policy, and shocks to the money and goods markets are often responsible for year–to–year changes in output and employment. Because changes in aggregate demand are crucial to short–run fluctuations, policymakers monitor the economy closely. Before making any change in monetary or fiscal policy, they want to know whether the economy is booming or heading into a recession.
Lesson 3: In the long run, the rate of money growth determines the rate of inflation, but it does not affect the rate of unemployment.
In addition to GDP, inflation and unemployment are among the most closely watched measures of economic performance. Chapter 2 discussed how these two variables are measured, and subsequent chapters developed models to explain how they are determined.
The long–run analysis of Chapter 5 stresses that growth in the money supply is the ultimate determinant of inflation. That is, in the long run, a currency loses real value over time if and only if the central bank prints more and more of it. This lesson can explain the decade–to–decade variation in the inflation rate that we have observed in the United States, as well as the far more dramatic hyperinflations that various countries have experienced from time to time.
“And please let Janet Yellen accept the things she cannot change, give her the courage to change the things she can, and the wisdom to know the difference. ”
We have also seen many of the long–run effects of high money growth and high inflation. In Chapter 5 we saw that, according to the Fisher effect, high inflation raises the nominal interest rate (so that the real interest rate remains unaffected). In Chapter 6 we saw that high inflation leads to a depreciation of the currency in the market for foreign exchange.
The long–run determinants of unemployment are very different. According to the classical dichotomy—the irrelevance of nominal variables in the determination of real variables—growth in the money supply does not affect unemployment in the long run. As we saw in Chapter 7, the natural rate of unemployment is determined by the rates of job separation and job finding, which in turn are determined by the process of job search and by the rigidity of the real wage.
Thus, we concluded that persistent inflation and persistent unemployment are unrelated problems. To combat inflation in the long run, policymakers must reduce the growth in the money supply. To combat unemployment, they must alter the structure of labor markets. In the long run, there is no tradeoff between inflation and unemployment.
Lesson 4: In the short run, policymakers who control monetary and fiscal policy face a tradeoff between inflation and unemployment.
Although inflation and unemployment are not related in the long run, in the short run there is a tradeoff between these two variables, which is illustrated by the short–run Phillips curve. As we discussed in Chapter 14, policymakers can use monetary and fiscal policies to expand aggregate demand, which lowers unemployment and raises inflation. Or they can use these policies to contract aggregate demand, which raises unemployment and lowers inflation.
Policymakers face a fixed tradeoff between inflation and unemployment only in the short run. Over time, the short–run Phillips curve shifts for two reasons. First, supply shocks, such as changes in the price of oil, change the short–run tradeoff; an adverse supply shock offers policymakers the difficult choice of higher inflation or higher unemployment. Second, when people change their expectations of inflation, the short–run tradeoff between inflation and unemployment changes. The adjustment of expectations ensures that the tradeoff exists only in the short run. That is, only in the short run does unemployment deviate from its natural rate, and only in the short run does monetary policy have real effects. In the long run, the classical model of Chapters 3 through 9 describes the world.