Looking Back Looking Ahead

When chief of the German general staff Count Helmuth von Moltke imagined the war of the future in a letter to his wife in 1905, his comments were surprisingly accurate. “It will become a war between peoples which will not be concluded with a single battle,” the general wrote, “but which will be a long, weary struggle with a country that will not acknowledge defeat until the whole strength of its people is broken.”10 As von Moltke predicted, World War I broke peoples and nations. The trials of total war increased the power of the centralized state and brought down the Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman, and Russian Empires. The brutal violence shocked and horrified observers across the world; ordinary citizens were left to mourn their losses.

Despite high hopes for Wilson’s Fourteen Points, the Treaty of Versailles hardly brought lasting peace. The war’s disruptions encouraged radical political conflict in the 1920s and 1930s and the rise of totalitarian regimes across Europe, which led to the even more extreme violence of the Second World War. Indeed, some historians believe that the years from 1914 to 1945 might most accurately be labeled a modern Thirty Years’ War, since the problems unleashed in August 1914 were only really resolved in the 1950s. This strong assertion contains a great deal of truth. For all of Europe, World War I was a revolutionary conflict of gigantic proportions with lasting traumatic effects.

Make Connections

Think about the larger developments and continuities within and across chapters.

  1. While the war was being fought, peoples on all sides of the fighting often referred to the First World War as “the Great War.” Why would they find this label appropriate?

  2. How did the First World War draw on long-standing political rivalries and tensions among the European powers (Chapters 19, 23, and 24)?

  3. To what extent was the First World War actually a “world” war?