The most basic cause of imperial collapse was the rising demand of non-
European empires had been based on an enormous power differential between the rulers and the ruled, a difference that had greatly declined by 1945. Western Europe was economically devastated and militarily weak immediately after the war. Moreover, the Japanese had driven imperial rulers from large parts of East Asia during the war in the Pacific, shattering the myth of European superiority and invincibility. In Southeast Asia, European imperialists confronted strong anticolonial nationalist movements that re-
964
To some degree, the Great Powers regarded their empires very differently after 1945 than before 1914, or even before 1939. Empire had rested on self-
Furthermore, the imperial powers faced dedicated anticolonial resistance. Popular politicians, including China’s Mao Zedong, India’s Mohandas Gandhi, Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser, and many others, provided determined leadership in the struggle against European imperialism. A new generation of intellectuals, such as Jomo Kenyatta of Kenya and Aimé Césaire and Frantz Fanon, both from Martinique, wrote trenchant critiques of imperial power, often rooted in Marxist ideas. (See “Evaluating the Evidence 28.3: Frantz Fanon on Violence, Decolonization, and Human Dignity.”) Anticolonial politicians and intellectuals alike helped inspire colonized peoples to resist and overturn imperial rule.
Around the globe, the Cold War had an inescapable impact on decolonization. Liberation from colonial rule had long been a central goal for proponents of Communist world revolution. The Soviets and, after 1949, the Communist Chinese advocated rebellion in the developing world and promised to help end colonial exploitation and bring freedom and equality in a socialist state. They supported Communist independence movements with economic and military aid, and the guerrilla insurgent armed with a Soviet-
Western Europe and particularly the United States offered a competing vision of independence, based on free-
After they had won independence, the leaders of the new nations often found themselves trapped between the superpowers, compelled to voice support for one bloc or the other. Many new leaders followed a third way, adopting a policy of nonalignment, remaining neutral in the Cold War and playing both sides for what they could get.