COMMON THREADS
One of the Common Threads discussed in Chapter 1 is about the role that media play in a democracy. Today, one of the major concerns is the proliferation of news sources. How well is our society being served by this trend—especially on cable and the Internet—compared with the time when just a few major news media sources dominated journalism?
Historians, media critics, citizens, and even many politicians argue that a strong democracy is only possible with a strong, healthy, skeptical press. In the “old days,” a few legacy or traditional media—key national newspapers, three major networks, and three newsmagazines—provided most of the journalistic common ground for discussing major issues confronting U.S. society.
In today’s online and 24/7 cable world, though, the legacy or mainstream media have ceded some of their power and many of their fact-checking duties to new media forms, especially in the blogosphere. As discussed in this chapter and in Chapter 8, this loss is partly economic, driven by severe cutbacks in newsroom staffs due to substantial losses in advertising (which has gone to the Internet), and partly because bloggers, 24/7 cable news media, and news satire shows like The Daily Show and The Colbert Report are fact-checking the media as well as reporting stories that used to be the domain of professional news organizations.
The case before us then goes something like this: In the “old days,” the major news media provided us with reports and narratives to share, discuss, and argue about. But in today’s explosion of news and information, that common ground has eroded or is shifting. Instead, today we often rely only on those media sources that match our comfort level, cultural values, or political affiliations; increasingly these are blog sites, radio talk shows, or cable channels. Sometimes these opinion channels and sites are not supported with the careful fact-gathering and verification that has long been a pillar of the best kinds of journalism.
So in today’s media environment, how severely have technological and cultural transformations undermined the “common ground” function of mainstream media? And, are these changes ultimately good or bad for democracy?
KEY TERMS
The definitions for the terms listed below can be found in the glossary at the end of the book. The page numbers listed with the terms indicate where the term is highlighted in the chapter.
news, 488
newsworthiness, 488
ethnocentrism, 490
responsible capitalism, 490
small-town pastoralism, 491
individualism, 491
conflict of interest, 494
herd journalism, 500
sound bite, 505
public journalism, 508
For review quizzes, chapter summaries, links to media-related Web sites, and more, go to bedfordstmartins.com/mediaculture.
REVIEW QUESTIONS
Modern Journalism in the Information Age
Ethics and the News Media
Reporting Rituals and the Legacy of Print Journalism
Journalism in the Age of TV and the Internet
Alternative Models: Public Journalism and “Fake” News
Democracy and Reimagining Journalism’s Role
QUESTIONING THE MEDIA
ADDITIONAL VIDEOS
Visit the VideoCentral: Mass Communication section at bedfordstmartins.com/mediaculture for additional exclusive videos related to Chapter 14, including:
Journalism and legal scholars discuss the ethical considerations inherent to the news industry.
Pulitzer Prize - winning journalist Clarence Page and the Onion editor Joe Randazzo explore how objectivity began in journalism and how reporter biases may nonetheless influence news stories.
Reporters and media critics explain what shield laws are and how they apply to both professional and citizen journalists.