COMMON THREADS
One of the Common Threads discussed in Chapter 1 is about mass media, cultural expression, and storytelling. The movie industry is a particularly potent example of this, as Hollywood movies dominate international screens. But Hollywood dominates our domestic screens as well. Does this limit our exposure to other kinds of stories?
Since the 1920s, after the burgeoning film industries in Europe lay in ruins from World War I, Hollywood gained an international dominance it has never relinquished. Critics have long cited America’s cultural imperialism, flooding the world with our movies, music, television shows, fashion, and products. The strength of American cultural and economic power is evident when you witness a Thai man in a Tommy Hilfiger shirt watching Transformers at a Bangkok bar while eating a hamburger and drinking a Coke. Critics feel that American-produced culture overwhelms indigenous cultural industries, which will never be able to compete at the same level.
But other cultures are good at bending and blending our content. Hip-hop has been remade into regional music in places like Senegal, Portugal, Taiwan, and the Philippines. McDonald’s is global, but in India you can get a McAlooTikki sandwich—a spicy fried potato and pea vegetarian patty. In Turkey, you can get a McTurco, a kebab with lamb or chicken. Or in France you can order a beer with your meal.
While some may be proud of the success of America’s cultural exports, we might also ask ourselves this: What is the impact of our cultural dominance on our own media environment? Foreign films, for example, account for less than 2 percent of all releases in the United States. Is this because we find subtitles or other languages too challenging? At points in the twentieth century, American moviegoers were much more likely to see foreign films. Did our taste in movies change on our own accord, or did we simply forget how to appreciate different narratives and styles?
Of course, international content does make it to our shores. We exported rock and roll, and the British sent it back to us, with long hair. They also gave us The Office and House of Cards. Japan gave us anime, Pokémon, Iron Chef, and Hello Kitty.
But in a world where globalization is a key phenomenon, Hollywood rarely shows us the world through another’s eyes. The burden falls to us to search out and watch those movies until Hollywood finally gets the message.
KEY TERMS
The definitions for the terms listed below can be found in the glossary at the end of the book. The page numbers listed with the terms indicate where the term is highlighted in the chapter.
celluloid, 242
kinetograph, 242
kinetoscope, 242
vitascope, 243
narrative films, 243
nickelodeons, 244
vertical integration, 245
oligopoly, 245
studio system, 245
block booking, 246
movie palaces, 247
multiplexes, 247
Big Five, 247
Little Three, 247
blockbuster, 248
talkies, 248
newsreels, 249
genre, 249
documentary, 254
cinema verité, 254
indies, 256
Hollywood Ten, 257
Paramount decision, 258
megaplexes, 263
Big Six, 264
synergy, 264
digital video, 266
consensus narratives, 267
For review quizzes, chapter summaries, links to media-related Web sites, and more, go to bedfordstmartins.com/mediaculture.
REVIEW QUESTIONS
Early Technol ogy and the Evolution of Movies
The Rise of the Hollywood Studio System
The Studio System’s Golden Age
The Transformation of the Studio System
The Economics of the Movie Business
Popular Movies and Democracy
QUESTIONING THE MEDIA
ADDITIONAL VIDEOS
Visit the VideoCentral: Mass Communication section at bedfordstmartins.com/mediaculture for additional exclusive videos related to the issues discussed in Chapter 7.