Printed Page 12

Even as far back as ancient times, human beings have always discussed and debated the media’s merits and dangers. The earliest recorded debates in Western society about the impact of the written word on daily life date back to the ancient Greeks—in particular, to Socrates, Euripides, and Plato. These men argued over whether theatrical plays would corrupt young people by exposing them to messages that conflicted with those promulgated by their teachers.

Today, we still debate these sorts of questions. At the turn of the twentieth century, for example, newly arrived immigrants to the United States who spoke little English gravitated toward vaudeville shows and silent films, which they could enjoy without having to understand English. These popular events occasionally became a flash point for some groups. For example, the Daughters of the American Revolution, local politicians, religious leaders, and police vice squads feared that these “low” cultural forms would undermine what they saw as traditional American values.

Since then, print, electronic, and digital communications have extended their reach, and people have begun spending more time consuming them (see Table 1.1). Mass media now play an even more controversial role in society. For instance, some people are frustrated by the overwhelming amount of information available. Others decry what they view as mass media’s overly commercial and sensationalistic quality. In their view, too many talk shows exploit personal problems for commercial gain, and too many TV shows and video games feature graphic violence.

People also keep grappling with the question, “To what extent do mass media shape our values and behaviors, and to what extent do our values and behaviors shape the media?” Researchers have continued searching for answers to this question. For example, some have designed studies to determine whether watching violent TV shows makes viewers more likely to commit violent acts. Other scholars argue that violent TV shows don’t cause violent behavior in viewers. Rather, people who already have violent tendencies are drawn to violent TV shows. Still others suggest that different variables—such as age, upbringing, or genetic predisposition—might be the root causes of violence. Research into such questions of media and violence hasn’t yielded conclusive answers. But it does encourage us to keep asking questions and to examine the approaches we use to analyze the media’s role in our lives.

Source: Veronis Suhler Stevenson Communications Industry Forecast.

Finally, people have expressed concern about the financial power of mass media industries. In the United States, these industries earn more than $200 billion annually, and reinvest those revenues to research how we choose our media content, what we do with that content, and how media companies can better serve our needs and influence our behaviors (from shopping to voting) so they can make more money.

Like the air we breathe, mass media surround us, and we often take its impact, like that of the air, for granted. If we don’t take it for granted, we frequently can’t agree on its quality. To monitor the media’s “air quality” more proactively and productively, we must become media literate. We can start by examining several models for understanding media’s nature and impact.